Digital Crime and Digital Terrorism, Term Paper Example

Introduction

Humans have been accustomed to doing what they think is right in response to what they need in life. Relatively, there are instances when life itself presents several situations that make such decision of doing good such a hard turn for some. Because of the hardships that life itself presents, it could be realized that there are instances when humans decide against what is right and negate the law so as to simply refine their way of living through the doing what they think would do to support those who are theirs[1]. On the other hand, other individuals resort to crime for other reasons. With the different impending reasons for the existence of crime in the society, it could not be denied that this aspect of discussion has gained a lot of attention among psychologists and other experts involved in the field of bettering the situation of the society. Understandably the desire to regulate the current society’s situation is a global aim. Nonetheless, the consistent process of advancement that the society itself embraces makes it harder for such aim to be fulfilled.

In the discussion that follows, a referential discussion on crime, its definition and evolution as well as its advancements towards the digital age shall be given attention to. Giving a specific focus on how crime becomes a form of terrorism which attacks more than just one but a massive number of population, this discussion hopes to raise specific points that could be used in providing solution to the said matter. Making the best out of the researches that has been written about the same topic before and stating the facts in relation to such claims and explanations shall establish the reliability of this presentation for practical reference and application in the field of defeating criminal approaches utilized in the digital age especially in the aim of controlling these situations through advanced and well supported enforcement of the law.

Understanding the Psychology of Crime

Crime is basically described as the process by which one person or a group of individuals become involved in a situation that is completely against the law. Relatively, the instance by which crime is handled starts with the planning due to the existence of a certain motivation. Some crimes however occur without any plans as they are being considered abrupt or were insisted due to the turn of events that stirred up human aggression[2]. During these instances, the targets of the crime become random and the approach to the crime itself becomes relatively chaotic.

However, when it comes to planned crimes, the motivation is usually solid, the procedures are intact and the attacks are stationary and confirmed. Considerably, it could be observed that when it comes to the target victims of the crime the assumptions could be rather random or perceived depending on what the organizers decide upon[3]. What makes an act a crime is the fact that it negates the law, it involves victims and it manifests a sense of intent to trample the rights of another in an aim to push through for a particular aim the motivated the planning of the operation.

As of today, the most feared criminal operations are that of the organized crimes. Relatively, this form of crime targets almost “just anyone”. The effects are massive and the motivations are very solid that at some point, the executions of the plans are almost irreversible. It should be recognized that individuals and groups involved in such situations are trained and are specifically motivated to complete the plan whatever it takes, sometimes even when it involves losing their own lives, they push through with the execution. Adding up to the solidity of the beliefs of such perpetrators, is the complexity of their execution now even aided with the utilization of modern technology. This particular fact has lead to the indicative fact that organized crime and the attack of terrorists have become almost uncontrollable especially when it comes to pointing out the execution that they have planned. This is the reason why it is highly suggested that law enforcers be given the chance to establish their strength in dealing with such situations through deepening the process by which they unearth the plans of the crime organizers.[4] Further discussion on this part would however be presented in the preceding sections of this presentation.

The Evolution of Crime

Crime starts with a desire accompanied by aggression that stirs up the thinking of the perpetrator hence pushing him to the edge of engaging in the process of pursuing what he plans to do. Larger forms of crime that involve groups require more structured systems and more established source of motivation. As sensitive as the case may be, most large-scope crimes are specifically planned for and carefully organized by heads and their followers through certain series of connections. Organized as the crime is, the perpetrators are scattered in several different distant areas and are usually utilizing different forms of communication to continue with their plans. As careful as the perpetrators are, the organizers tend to choose remote areas for operation. They usually consider low-profile locations for their remote connections so as to keep themselves “in-the-low” before they actually execute the planned attack[5].

Surprisingly, as complicated as the procedures of incurring the crime are, the planning and operational preparations of such forms of crime, take months or at times even years before they are actually executed. If it takes that long, how come government authorities and law enforcers find a hard time immediately tracking them down or at some point getting to their headquarters and head perpetrators even before the crime occurs? There are different reasons to respond to that particular situation in the manner of redefining the process by which crime is fought against by know what they the law.

One reason is that the approaches to planning and keeping themselves in a secret protection are usually sophisticated. The perpetrators basically are doing and they know what to protect themselves from. Trained as some of the organizers are, they are able to direct their people effectively so as to assure the smooth transition of events that would lead to the actualization of the crime’s completion. On the other end, there are also assumptions [and at some point have been proven true] that big organizers of crime involving groups from international operators get protection from law enforcers who are either supporting the cause of the terrorists or are simply being paid their part to provide the protection that the group needs[6]. So far, the most sophisticated approach that the perpetrators embrace at present is that of the utilization of digital technology to hide their tracks and impose effective communication among members for the sake of the accurate completion of the planned attacks.

Terrorism in the Digital Age

Everything is high tech in this world of digital revolution. The conclusive state by which the digitalization of the society changed the modern human culture is an inevitable truth that must be accepted by everyone else at present. The said revolution in the application of technological approaches to modern ways of human living has greatly affected the ways by which perpetrators of crime work their way towards executing their plans. Undeniably, this form of operation has aided the crime organizers to fully work on their plans even when they are separated by distance and remote locations. Communication too has become easier to contend with between their members[7]. Having technologically trained members of the groups, such organizations are able to protect their connections and hide their visibility through putting specific encryptions that are harder to find unless the law enforcers utilize high-edged programs to breech the said encryptions[8].

On the other end, getting more supporters for their cause [especially if it is religious or socially compelling in approach] has become an easier task for the perpetrators of the operation. Relatively, their desire to attract more to make their desire more manifest to the society has become a lot more convenient at the entrance of the digital era. This is the reason why it is highly encouraged that government agencies engaging in crime fighting programs and other operations that aim to contend with the increasing rate of organized crimes happening in the society today be given the proper support to develop their systems, update their operations and heighten their excellence in the utilization of technology so as to meet with the caliber of the skills that the organizers of large crimes have[9]. If there is one thing to consider about technology and the digitalization of crimes, two can play at the game. If the law enforcement team are properly informed and have the rights skills to use to control the situation, the planned crimes, their organizers and the execution of such operations are sure to be caught early on.

Conclusion

Digitalization of terrorism has become a trend that most organized crime perpetrators embrace at present. It could be analyzed that in a way, the situational consideration by which such operations are opted to be controlled and if possible ceased could only be faced by imposing the skills on the digital system that the organizers have. This means that the law enforcers would be able to catch the perpetrators if they have the skills in par with that of their counterparts. This is an investment that the government officials and agencies involved in the process of fighting mass crimes imposed through organized criminal attacks[10]. Being keen in observing the suspected perpetrators is not enough, getting into the story and actually knowing what the plan for the crime is still noted to be the more effective approach to the situation. Crimes need not be a problem if the government and its crime-fighting agencies are equipped and trained enough to face the challenge. Having the right people, the right facilities and letting them people incur right training could strengthen how the current society faces organized crimes aided through the assumption of the digital age as part of the operation’s success.

References

Blythe, James M. (2000). Ideal Government and the Mixed Constitution in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Cohen, Stanley (2000). Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. Polity Press.

Hart, H.L.A. (1972). Law, Liberty and Morality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Dworkin, Ronald. (2005). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.

Foucault, Michel (1975). Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, New York: Random House.

[1] Blythe, James M. (2000). Ideal Government and the Mixed Constitution in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[2] Blythe, James M. (2000). Ideal Government and the Mixed Constitution in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[3] Blythe, James M. (2000). Ideal Government and the Mixed Constitution in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[4] Foucault, Michel (1975). Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, New York: Random House.

[5] Hart, H.L.A. (1972). Law, Liberty and Morality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

[6] Dworkin, Ronald. (2005). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.

[7] Cohen, Stanley (2000). Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. Polity Press.

[8] Cohen, Stanley (2000). Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. Polity Press.

[9] Cohen, Stanley (2000). Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. Polity Press.

[10] Cohen, Stanley (2000). Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. Polity Press.