Health Information System, Term Paper Example

My organization has implemented the electronic health record (EHR) system standardized by Kaiser Permenantes. This company projects nine standards namely quality; truthfulness; informed consent; professionalism; responsible partnering; web links; accountability and responsiveness; access to site information policies and privacy and confidentiality. This health information technology allows data could be shared among various health care systems within a specific geographic location or across country based on these standards. Data exchanges include sharing of demographics; medication and allergic reactions, medical history; immunization status, radiology images; laboratory test results, vital signs and personal information inclusive of weight, age and billing status (Traynor, 2008).

The technical features encompass digital formatting enabling data sharing security over networks; tracking care services such as prescriptions written by providers and outcomes of interventions; triggering warning and reminders alerts as well as sending receiving reports, orders and laboratory results. Precisely, the system is established along a computer networking device design. Health information exchange is an essential function of electronic health record technology. As such, there is a social and technical framework created to move electronically through efficient computerized programs among organizations. Simultaneously, reporting to public health agencies and ePrescribing is accomplished as well as sharing important confidential data among providers (Gunter & Terry, 2005).

Key end systems associated with electronic health records (EHR) include the clinical decision support system (CDSS) responsible for alerts, reminders, updating on clinical practice guidelines. Electronic health record information system is also related to the key end and intermediary systems of computerized physician order entry (CPOE). Other features include secure messaging through email. This links clinical units to physician offices; pharmacies and laboratories though a telephone triage since communication among these units is essential to efficiency (Hoyt & Alder, 2013).

More in-depth key end and intermediary systems include an interface with practice management soft- ware consisting of scheduling and patient portal, which reviews patient billing issues and benefits. Besides, there is a managed care module for physicians along with site profiling features for determining the best managed care facility for patient if that becomes a necessity. Embedded also within this unique electronic health system is the Health Plan Employer Data Information Set (HEDIS) to facilitate basic cost analysis (Habib, 2010).

Importantly, the system allows for generation of reports, graphical representation of data; performing evaluations; creating problem summaries; function as a knowledge resource; put in as well as access information via a smart phone and provide an electronic patient encounter. This special feature enables physicians within second to monitor patients’ changes in treatment, doctors’ visits all from the comfort of a computer without moving outside of the room. Essentially, there are various devices facilitating the process such as input through texting or typing, which ever saves time or more efficient (Hoyt & Alder, 2013).

In my opinion the system is optimally designed because it is modern and contains all relevant mechanism for providing a state of the art electronic record data. Licensing procedures have been undertaken and this seems to be the most intriguing aspect of installing an efficient electronic health record system. The standardization hierarchy networks of my organization is Kaiser Permenantes and its standards tells of its efficiency. Significantly, the advantage of electronic record implementation to any organization is that it does not limit one to sitting at a workstation, but according to the settings advanced system as the one in my organization allows the use of smartphones and other mobile devices to input and retrieve data. Conclusively, the electronic record system in my organization in my opinion is the best and most appropriate.

References

Gunter, T., & Terry, N. (2005). The Emergence of National Electronic Health Record Architectures in the United States and Australia: Models, Costs, and Questions. J Med Internet Res 7: 1.

Habib, J. (2010). HRs, meaningful use, and a model EMR. Drug Benefit Trends 22 (4): 99–101.

Hoyt, R., & Alder, K. (2013). Electronic health Records. New York. Free Press.

Traynor, K. (2008). National health information network passes live test. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 65 (22): 2086–2087.