Smart Port, Smart Index for Jebeli Ali Port, Dissertation – Results Example

Abstract

Ports and harbors face tough pressure for market dominance to have a more efficient and secure global distribution of products. High-performance ports implement smart technology to better manage operations that meet the new difficulties in ensuring safe , secure as well as energy-efficient facilities which reduce environmental impact. A new term has arisen in this sense which is named smart port. A common concept of a smart port was not well known however. In order to evaluate a smart port as well as a quantitative measure, smart port index (SPI), which ports should use to boost their resilience and sustainability, this paper aims to address 30 main performance indicators, dependent processes, resources, climate, safety and protection, `it and sustainability shipping benchmarks. Jebel Ali Port output is measured using the SPIs. The approach used offers a quantitative framework to help Jebel Ali Port authorities establish their smart port plans, evaluate their smartness, and recognize strengths and shortcomings for quality management of their ongoing business operations. The study findings indicate that the Jebel Ali Port SPI value is affected by government policies or the region-specific variables.

Introduction

Jebel Ali Port is a deep architecture which conducts business transactions under the regulations provide. With the world economy requiring maritime transport, ports have been experiencing growing pressure to maximize their efficiency in relation to political , social, energy conservation and realistic issues affecting their viability. Operations contain main components and related problems (Braveboy, 2015). Such problems can continue without prompt preparation and implementation of preventive and corrective measures. To meet these new challenges, Jebel Ali Port is the adoption of  technology-based solutions, alongside approaches to port operations management planning through embracing smart ports.  A port’s smartness is more about philosophy than regarding technology and the related infrastructures. This paper presents the use of smart ports the utilization of the new technology to boost port efficiency or provide alternatives to energy as well as environmental problems.

Hypothesis

Literature Review

Study of the literature shows that existing smart port projects across the world can be classified as multifunctional interventions and narrowed projects into two. Multipurpose Smart Port projects are long-term policies and approaches addressing different facets of port operations, while focused measures concentrate on minimizing particular obstacles inside the port. We should concentrate on multi-purpose smart port projects to study the SPIs and make suggestions for management of Jebel Ali Port. The relevance of this paper is that  aims to provide Jebeli Ali Airport with a structured description of smart port as well as its comparative analysis of the “smart port ranking.” With the recent advent of the smart port paradigm, literature has not presented well a coherent description of a smart port alongside its related core operation domains. Thus, this paper aims to examine Jebeli Ali Airport’s SPIs in order to align it with the smart port concept and its operation domains based on the literature given, and to encourage a road toward smarter ports by presenting port authorities with a systematic description of smart port as well as the associated quantitative indicator “smart port index.” Three research questions are tackled in this paper

1. What is a smart port as well as its areas of activity?
2. What are Jebeli Ali Airport’s recognizable SPI domains as well as subdomains?
3. Which can be achieved at Jebeli Ali Airport to attain smart ports status?

The rest of the current  research paper is structured according to the following. The next segment proposes a set of KPIs for smartness ports assessment, and a smart port index is created. It is worth noting that the  availability of data for the port has been restricted, and this could pose shortcomings in the measurement of all KPIs being evaluated in this article. For numerical experiments, this will necessitate the modification of the index measurement approach toward address the outlined limitation. That will not, however, impact the formation of the SPI index. The last segment concludes this report and offers potential directions as well as suggestions for future work at Jebeli Ali Port.

Methodology 

The fields under observation are Processes, Resources, Climate, Health and Protection, IT and Sustainability. It will form the SPIs, which will originate from 30 KPIs derived from PIs port’s data set.

SPI001 Environmental Performance

Environment Performance is defined an indicator of the port ‘s capacity to prevent pollution and mitigate pollutants generated by the ship activities that affect the atmosphere. For every single ship registered. SPI001 is measured in ‘%’ Formula to calculate value is as follows:

Dependencies

KPI028 Releases of substances: KPI001 Ballast water management violations: This KPI reflects the willingness of the Organization to conform to relevant ballast water treatment laws and regulations. It is defined as the number of occasions that predominant regulations concerning ballast water management have been breached and reported by an outside party.

KPI Value Formula

PI015 Violations of water management

KPI Value Example

KPI Rating

This KPI requires only a single PI. Notes are collected from the Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM) and Regional Guidelines of the International Convention for the Control and Maintenance of Ships

KPI007 Contained spills

This KPI is an indication of the willingness of the company to prevent spills. Contained spills, which encompass liquid as specified in Annex I of MARPOL. Contained spills are not included in protected places such as Engine rooms.

KPI011 Environmental deficiencies

KPI005 CO2 efficiency: This KPI describes the ship’s energy output by relating the amount of CO2 generated to the overall transport function on the container. The expression gives the amount of CO2 produced per ton of freight transported per mile. As the PI meaning ‘Emitted Mass CO2’ is to be supplied in tons, the number is multiplied by 1 million in order to achieve the KPI meaning in g / transport function (ton-mile, TEU mile, etc.)

KPI Value Formula

PI007 Emitted mass of CO2

PI064 Transport work

KPI Value Example

KPI Rating Formula:

KPI Rating Example

The energy efficiency question is complicated as a result of the broad range of factors that affect it. Commercial operator has a responsibility in maintaining the proper use of the equipment in relation to the use of the ship’s power, which affects the transport work. The industry itself is the other big element surrounding transport jobs. The characteristics of the ship including hull size, engine type alongside the load factor associated with each voyage both affect the volume of CO2 released.

KPI026 Releases of substances: KPI communicates the capacity of the organization to prevent material releases as specified by MARPOL. 4.28.1.2 Interpretation. Such is achieved by estimating the number of leaks of contaminants (PI053) and of oil spills (PI055) shall be recorded.

KPI Rating Formula:

KPI Rating Example

KPI Value Example

KPI Meaning for PI053 number of leaks of pollutants into the atmosphere in one quarter = 1 PI055 Amount of oil spills in one quarter = 0 KPI Pollutants leaks = 1. The KPI reports on the amount of accidents instead of challenges with calculating the real volume / quantity of a leak or release. Both releases to the atmosphere of oil and other chemicals, as protected by MARPOL Annex I to V, have to be reported and counted as accident. The minimum quantity to be recorded under MARPOL Annex I to V for release of substances is according to the Company’s SMS.

The KPI reports on the amount of accidents instead of challenges with calculating the real volume/quantity of a leak or release. These releases to the atmosphere of oil and other chemicals, as protected by MARPOL Annex I to V, have to be reported or counted as accident. The minimum quantity to be reported under MARPOL Annex I to V for release of chemicals is according to the Safety Management Framework of the organization.

KPI030 SOx efficiency

This KPI describes a ship’s energy output by measuring emitted mass of SOx produced compared to the research performed on shipping. The term gives the mass of SOx produced per ton of freight transported/mile. Since  its PI value “Emitted mass SOx” is to be supplied in kg, the number is multiplied by 1 thousand in order to achieve the KPI value in  .

KPI Value Formula: PI009 Emitted mass of SOx

PI064 Transport work

KPI Value Example

KPI Rating Formula: KPIMinReq = 1.5

KPITarget = 0.6

KPI_Rating = 100* (KPI_Value – KPI_MinReq)/ (KPI_Target – KPI _MinReq)

The issue of quality of SOx is compounded because many factors which pose a significant influence. The commercial operator bares the responsibility of using ship power, which affects the transport work. The sector itself is the other big factor contributing to transport work. Features of the ship, which may include the size of the hull, engine type, and even the payload capacity for the particular trip all influence the volume of SOx mass produced by the amount of fuel ingested.

SPI002 Safety and Security

Navigational Safety Performance serves as an indication of secure navigation and lack of navigational capabilities. Safety Quality is an indication of the port’s capacity to handle shortcomings in ship safety. SPI002 is measured in ‘%’. Thus, the formula to calculate value is as follows:

Dependencies

KPI019 Navigational deficiencies: They are crucial to gathering navigation-related deficiencies identified in the course of the given portion. For this PI and Amount of recorded external inspections (PI052) the test Navigational Deficiencies (KPI019) is uses. Number of navigational defects as well as non-conformities, which include any non-standard actions, procedures reported by external parties via external inspection. They may include compulsory audits, excluding some other voluntary audits.

For example, the Number of navigation systems deficiencies = 4 Examples of relevant THETIS defect coding: all insufficiency codes beginning with 05 as well as 10 are navigation connected

• KPI020 Navigational incidents
• KPI029 Security deficiencies

Fire and Explosions

This KPI reflects the willingness of the organization to prevent aboard ship fire and fires. The KPI measures the number of instances of fire and disaster as recorded in the organization’s corporate accident records.

KPI Value Formula

Example

Notes

With this SPI to be improved a specific KPI will be called. The KPI is referred to as security events and deals with real security accidents, while the current KPI, named protection vulnerabilities, deals with protection administrative breaches.

• SPI003 Energy
• SPI004 Operations

Operating success is an example of the ship’s operational quality including customer safety, secure and effective handling of freight, service readiness and budget control. The calculation of SPI002 is ‘percent.’ Calculation of interest function is as follows: SPI004 = (KPI002 + KPI010 + KPI004 + KPI024 + KPI032 + KPI033)6

• Dependencies

KPI002 Budget performance: This KPI represents the difference in total spending. This represents the willingness of the organization to manage the running costs for the ship effectively. The cost efficiency is not rated. All positive as well as negative differences are perceived in the same manner.

KPI Value Formula

PI010 Last year’s AAE

PI011 Last year’s accruals as well as actual running costs

PI012 Last year’s cost budget

KPI Rating Formula

KPI Rating Example

KPI010 Drydocking planning performance

Actual Drydocking costs

This PI is crucial in capturing the actual costs of drydocking of ships. To measure drydocking performance (KPI010), the PI, Agreed Drydocking Budget (PI004), Agreed Drydocking Duration (PI005), as well as the Actual Drydocking Duration (PI002) are critical. That is the gross real drydocking costs correlated with this. In-water survey (IWS), changes and maintenance, not included in normal operating expenses, shall be required. This also covers charges for any more work not expected prior to drydocking.

Real drydocking time This PI records, the real drydocking period of the container. To calculate drydocking efficiency (KPI010), this PI, Accepted Drydocking Period (PI005), Approved Drydocking Expenditure (PI004) and Real Drydocking Expense (PI001) are used. That is the time of real drydocking. IWS, adjustments, and fixes are included.

Drydocking budget

The relevance of this  PI is that it captures the budget for drydocking ships. Drydocking Quality (KPI010) is calculated using this PI, Real Drydocking Costs (PI001), Agreed Drydocking Period (PI005) and Effective Drydocking Time (PI002). The overall expenditure number connected to drydocking as negotiated between ship management and owner Prior to the actual drydocking. IWS changes and maintenance, not included in normal operating expenses, shall be required. Extra work commenced after drydocking is authorized must therefore not be considered.

Drydocking duration

It PI records the negotiated time of drydocking on the boat. Drydocking efficiency (KPI010) is calculated using this PI, Real Drydocking Period (PI002), Negotiated Drydocking Expenditure (PI004) as well as Actual Drydocking Expense (PI001). The Drydocking Time Decided as decided by ship owner as well as shipyard Prior to the actual drydocking. This involves IWS, improvements, and fixes. Any continuation of the permitted (agreed) period after drydocking has started should NOT be allowed.

• KPI032 Ship availability
• KPI004: Cargo related incidents
• KPI024: Operational deficits
• KPI033: Vetting deficits

SP005 Information and Technology

IT is a concept focused on the ports to manage the integrated infrastructure, incorporate and decrease the amount of class problems and eliminate essential equipment as well as device failures. SPI005 is measured in ‘%’.

Formula to calculate value is as follows

Dependencies

KPI006 Condition of class: This PI measures the amount of Class Requirements assigned to a ship during quarter at a certain given moment. The PI is used for calculating Group Status (KPI006). Number of Class Terms issued during reporting period. Class Condition (CoC) is a written, class declaration. The meaning of “class condition” may differ across class societies, since some use the term “class status,” most use the term “recommendation.” Data related to this PI can be extracted from class documents and inspection notes, which will be consolidated from inspections conducted throughout reporting time.

Example During the first quarter:-15 Jan 2015 — MF / HF equipment made operational by 15 February — 15 January 2105 — Buckling of centerline girder in No. 2 Port ballast tanks IWO among frame 74 and 76 for rectification until the next docking Number of class conditions = 2

KPI012 Critical Systems and Equipment Failure

This PI records cumulative number of vital appliances and device faults. This PI is used for calculating Vital infrastructure and device breakdown (KPI012). The number of faults in the essential list of systems as well as equipment as specified throughout the SMS for the business. When several faults contribute to the same inaccessibility, both of them will be reported, since this PI tests the condition of the network, not the malfunction sequence.

A reasonable example will be: during the first quarter, the ship reported:-OWS inoperative susceptible to equipment malfunction on 10 January,-Emergency generator not running on auto-mode on 20 January,-GMDSS antenna malfunction on 25 Feb,-ECDIS / radar malfunction on 25 Mar, Amount of essential equipment and programming errors = 4. We propose KPIs which are included in the current SPI. To help the new KPIs, related performance metrics would need to grow. The two KPIs are related to: Cybersecurity; Performance of integrated systems (SCADA); Planned maintenance; and Technical deficiencies.