Using New Technology Systems, Term Paper Example

How receptive are the members of your organization to using new technology systems?

Ninety percent of employees in my organization are receptive to information technology. The remaining 10% who show some degree of resentment are older employees. They claim to be computer illiterate. It cannot be said that the 90% are enthusiastic about the change since the system itself becomes frustrating at time to manage. As such, when they complain it becomes difficult to convince the unreceptive 10% to accept the change.

What factors do you believe motivate members of your organization to use and try new technology systems? Why?

Factors which motivate employees in my organization to use and try modern technology are linked to the changes in technological development embracing the twenty-first century work environment. It appears very old fashion and outdated using paper documents in a twenty-first century health care organization. Besides, banks, stores and non-medicalorganizations are going paperless. Hence, the motivating factors are bringing the organization in alignment with the rest of the world as well as the business community of which health care is an important part(Greer, 2008).

Another factor pertains to the functioning of the system. Information systems with an efficient exchange mechanism save time; prevent employees walking from one clinical area and is more effective in data retrieval than paper records. When the benefits are summarized and providers realize how much money and time is reduced the motivation to implement and use the technology escalates(Greer, 2008).

What factors do you believe prevent or discourage members of your organization to use or try new technology systems? Why?

Factors which evidently discourage employees from using the system relate to whenrequired information cannot be accessed; data retrieved is inaccurate and time accessing patient’s records is too long. These are very frustrating factors. For someone new to computer technology the first response is reverting to paper records. At this point the employee would conclude that health information technology is a waste of time. In terms of providers some factors deterring them from trying the technology are implementation costs; next the uncertainty of whether their practice could recuperative the expenditure (Ford, Menachemi, Huerta, 2009).

Also, some breaches in confidentiality have occurred. These breaches could implicate employees as witnesses in law suits. Certainly, some members of my organizations are scared of legal mitigations. Consequently, they are afraid to use the system since it could create some difficulties for them on the job. The 10% who are reluctant to use the system exclaim that it is better safe than be sorry (Ford et.al, 2009).

What would you do as a Health Informatics Professional in your organization to gain acceptance and maximize the use of new and emerging information technology?

With these expressed concerns regarding electronic health records implementation within my organization asaHealth Informatics Professional the first step in resolving these resentments is conducting mini workshops with staff and vendors. At these workshops employees will be allowed to freely express resentments as well as concerns regarding use of the system. Information derived from this activity will be used in designing a seminar totrain employees in efficiently managing an electronic records system. After two months an evaluation of their performance with will system will be conducted. Further adjustments will be made catering to some individual employee’s needs(Menachemi, Ford, Beitsch, & Brooks, 2007).

References

Ford, E.Menachemi,N., & Huerta, T. (2009).Resistance Is Futile: But It Is Slowing the Pace of EHR Adoption Nonetheless.Journal of American Informatics Association.16(3); 274-81

Greer S. (2008) Medical autonomy: Peeling the onion.J Health Serv Res Policy;13:1-2

Menachemi, N. Ford, E. Beitsch, L., & Brooks, R. (2007).Incomplete EHR. Adoption: Late uptake of patient safety and cost control functions. Am J Med Qual, 22(5); 319-326