Programs dedicated to providing a better chance for the population in a community specifically entails to make an impact on how each individual develops towards becoming an asset in the society. Education programs in particular intend to support the more financially unfortunate members of the community to gain their fair share in relation to getting knowledge that they need to survive life. Relatively, giving the said members of the society such chance requires specific forms of administration indicating the close concern on how to completely fund the different activities of the organization relating to the goal of the program. Among the specific matters that should be given attention to then is that of the process of looking through the financial assets of the organization (Dubois, et al, 2009). Making sure that the current system of operation is able to provide ample funding to the program is essential for the sake of prolonging the life of the program thus adding up the number of beneficiaries who could be educated through it. Nevertheless, it is noted that administrators take an overall position in overseeing the concerns of any particular organization (Fry, 1989). In relation to this case, the administrator/s may be involved in several activities aside from that of the financial matters concerning the program established for adults and other members of the community. Nevertheless, the discussion herein will insist on the advantage that may be realized in relation to the knowledge or understanding that the administrator has over the financial matters concerning the programs and how such process of ‘knowing’ affects the form of administration he applies for the entire organization.
Understanding the General Role of Administrators
Administrators specifically take three particular positions in every organization. One is as the leader, another is as a director and the third is as the final decision maker. Being a leader, an administrator needs to know what the grounded foundation of his organization is. In this case, it could be realized that organizations providing adult and community education programs are grounded upon the need to provide social service to those who need and desire the said provisions. Most organizations engaging in such operations are noted to be non-profit. Some even thrive upon donations from supporters and from the government as well. As a leader, an administrator then tries to oversee that with the current fund that the organization has, he is still able to support all the necessary needs of the operation towards the benefit of the participants and the workers who are engaged in the system [e.g. community teachers, assistants and other individuals who work for the center] (Khan, 2008).
Being a director, an administrator sees to it that he is able to put in the ample number of personnel to handle the responsibilities that need to be accomplished. Scheduling the personnel in-charge and making sure that they are able to attend to their responsibilities is crucial to the continuing process of the program. On the other end, being a decision maker is the element that glues together all the other roles of an administrator (Khan, 2008). He is expected to provide final decisions especially in relation to particular changes and/or adjustments that the organization needs to give attention to. Through weighing the pros and cons of the current situation, an administrator is supposed to make sure that the final decision he would release would not be for the resolution of the current situation only, but for the sake of developing the entire organization’s status towards a much better position in the future.
The Nature of Adult and Community Education Program
Common community education programs are dependent on the capacity of an organization to provide ample teaching to members of the society that would immediately equip them to get at least a source of certification hence allowing them to gain particular jobs that the participants could use to support themselves. These programs, especially those that are designed to support adult education, are expected to provide sustainable options for the participants to take to be able to face the challenges of the economy on their own. It is expected that participants who undergo the assistance-system of such educational programs turn out to be equipped to create opportunities for themselves. Given that the participants are already adult, most of them are encouraged to establish their own businesses [may it be huge or large scale]. This then insists that most adult community education programs do not simply aim to create possibilities for the participants to become personally sustainable while also empowering the entire community’s economy to be boosted towards relative progress (Khan, 2008). This idealism specifically supports the matter relative to the process by which small-scale economies group together to support create a larger form of successful state and national economy. However, for this to happen, administrators need to be able to balance out all the resources of the organization thus making the teaching and assisting possible between the members of the organization and the participants of the program accordingly.
Financial Issues Related to the Situation
Financing the programs come from both donations and government support. Collections and fees gotten from the participants are supposed to fund all the necessary materials that they need for the training and learning that they are to undergo during the program. This means that the fees that are to be paid by the participants are supposed to be a lower rate [even though there are some programs that are provided without fees at all]. Dependent on the cases considered for development of adult participants on the program, it is essential that each form of program assistance is to be funded accordingly.
This is where the financial knowledge of the administrator comes in. Seeing all the needs of the relative receivers of the program, the administrator should be able to know how much financial assets the organization currently thrives within to make sure that they are able to respond to such needs. The essentiality of such knowledge also improves the capacity of the administrator to become more specific when it comes to directing the operations that the organization considers (Khan, 2008). Relatively, with ample knowledge of how much the organization has, how much it is that it operates with according to the current expenses that it engages with. Being able to balance what comes in and comes out that support the overall operation of the organization provides the administrator a chance to seek wise decisions that would assure the continuance of the program allowing it to extend the way it supports the community’s path towards growth and development (Fry, 1989).
Being an administrator who knows more about the financial condition of the organization allows the leader to become focused on how to adjust matters according to the financial status that they are currently dependent upon. Since such programs are not expected to generate profit, administrators who know the financial status of the organization are able to find a way to balance funding operations for the programs that are supported by the system (Galbraith, 1997). Understandably, such forms of management insists on the need of administrators to understand the manner by which organizational money is used accordingly to respond to the needs of the society and the needs of the participants who are enrolled in the system. True to its sense, operating with limited fund is a common matter especially when it comes to administering public or private organizations providing public service (Galbraith, 1997).
Community progress is a general need of societies around the globe. Relatively, it is through this need that the building up of organizations dedicated to supporting the less fortunate individuals to get for themselves a chance to become better especially in finding opportunities of earning that could support their personal needs while also gaining the possibility of supporting the desire of the community to develop the economy of the entire state that they are enjoined in. It is believed that through small steps, huge developments could be expected to be given birth. Having administrators who are able to respond to such responsibility of assisting others is essential in building up a community’s economy. More than that, an administrator who is knowledgeable f the financial operations of the organization he leads makes him more effective and efficient in handling his sworn responsibility. Balancing all the operations’ expenses with all that it is able to earn from contributions and other fees it collects shall make the decision of the administrator more effective in prolonging the program thus benefiting more in the coming years.
Hai, Jeong Chun. (2007). Principles of Public Administration: An Introduction. Kuala Lumpur: Karisma Publications.
Denhardt , Robert B. and Janet Vinzant Denhardt (2000). “The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering.” Public Administration Review 60(6).
Dubois, H.F.W. & Fattore, G. (2009), ‘Definitions and typologies in public administration research: the case of decentralization’, International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8): 704–727.
Galbraith, M.W. et al. (1997). Administering Successful Programs for Adults: Promoting Excellence in Adult, Community, and Continuing Education (Professional Practices in Adult Education and Human Resource Development Series). Krieger Publishing Company.
Fry, Brian R. (1989). Mastering Public Administration; from Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers, Inc. page 80.
Khan, Haroon A.(2008). Introduction to Public Administration. University Press of America, P. 33.