Business Law Assignment, Essay Example

Supporting evidence is an essential component of the judge’s ruling in business law. In J.E.B. v. Alabama, EX. REL. T.B. of the United States Supreme Court, the quality of the judge’s reasoning was insufficient. When an individual files for paternity and child support, the only way to objectively determine whether an individual is the parent of a child is to order a paternity test on the basis of a DNA genetic screen. Without this evidence, the court cannot positively determine a familial relationship. While this type of test is expensive, it is essential for the court to ensure that it makes the correct judgment and such a test would definitively confirm or reject the beliefs of the court.

Furthermore, the defendant had the right to contest the removal of males from the court. Federal law states that a jury should consist of peers. In many cases, this requires an approximately equal amount of males and females that come from different backgrounds. Even before the males were removed from the jury for various reasons according to the court, the men were in the minority; twelve males and twenty-four females is not an acceptable balance. It is clear that the prosecution wanted to use the ratio of males to females to their advantage, but they took this to a new level by removing the men from the court. It is believed that the women would vote more favorably towards the prosecution because the prosecutor was female. Many women can sympathize with the fact that a woman will suffer from financial restrictions due to the abandonment of their child’s father and will likely believe her case. Since there were no men in the room, there were no individuals who would be able to view this case from the other point of the view and understand that there are women who claim men fathered their child just to obtain money from them. Since this case had no objective evidence, and extremely biased subjective evidence, this weakens the court’s reasoning of this decision.