Diplomacy’s Role in Creating World Peace, Essay Example

Diplomatic negotiation demands substantial non-partisan debate where there will be no loser or winner. Those who engage in the discussion must be willing thoroughly to investigate the issues that are indispensable to the success of the negotiation. Those issues might relate to culture, religion, education, or the traditions of people in regions that have different views. Handelman, Sapir, states, “The real problem in discovering the role played by values in maintaining a relatively peaceful society is to determine which values are relevant and what manner they are relevant (Sapir 120). He further explains how diplomacy has worked by use of two critical examples of diplomacy. Political elite and public diplomacy were used during the Israel-Palestine conflict that saw the two nations coming into agreement. The concepts have caught on because they refer to ideas and practices that were already familiar to both nations’ scholars and policymakers and, more importantly, because both governments believes that political and public diplomacy – wielding of soft power – can enhance peace among the two nations.

Matthew Hoffman and Robert Denemark also bring about the importance of treatise in peace-making diplomacy is the solution. International treaties and agreements come from universal agreements on particular issues that are beneficial to all and therefore should not be. Parties in intercultural diplomacy bring to the table different life experiences and worldviews; therefore, what is socio-politically feasible for one group might be of disrespectful for the other in conducting diplomatic negotiations, it is essential to be aware that there are issues enshrined in the way of life of people in a particular environment. Political negotiation cannot succeed separate from the socio-cultural elements of any milieu. Each nation or community has its traditions and norms, and negotiations cannot succeed without embracing those indispensable components. All this must be put in accordance with the international law by governed rules between the different parties in terms of treatise (Hoffman and Denemark 190).

According to Kertesz et al, states that the failure of diplomacy that leads to the military option often occurs when a leader undermines strategic attempts at peace. Diplomacy cannot succeed if either participant has limited knowledge or a narrow view of the issues behind the conflict. A leader who engages in diplomacy must be aware of the traditional norms at hand and the past in order to avoid unwitting offense to the other nation (Kertesz et al 30).

Finally Berridge and Edan purports that successful diplomacy that leads to peace can happen only when both parties have adequate, relevant, and accurate information about the factors behind the crisis and are mutually committed to resolving the conflict with fairness and honesty. If one party submits a proposal without identifying the root causes of the problem, the negotiation may lead to chaos and, eventually, military intervention. Both authors connect the mutual relationship between diplomacy, law, and peace. Standard ground in the proposal, antagonism between the parties (diplomacy) can be only if there is a working lawful government. In other words, for peace to happen eventually, diplomacy and law must first succeed (Berridge 88).

Works Cited

Handelman, Sapir. “Two Complementary Settings of Peace-Making Diplomacy: Political-Elite Diplomacy And Public Diplomacy.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 23.1 (2012).

Hoffmann, Matthew J., and Robert A. Denemark. “Global Diplomacy In World System History: A Network Analysis Of The Multilateral Treaty System Over 400 Years.” Conference Papers — International Studies Association (2008).

Kertesz, Stephen Denis, and M. A. Fitzsimons. Diplomacy in a Changing World. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame, 2009. Print.

Eban, Abba Solomon. New diplomacy international affairs in the modern age. New York: Random House, 2003.

Berridge, G. R. Diplomatic Theory from Machievelli to Kissinger. New York: Palgrave, 2001.