Due Process in Police System, Essay Example

The subject of Due process is very vital in the judiciary system to ensure transparency and accountability. It is in the light of this fact that police officers should have the same due process as the citizens to ensure that their practices enhance trust and confidence of the public. Police officers just like other workers need a proper labor entity that provides a suitable ground to promote elements of collective bargaining, good compensation criteria and representation of the officers in various groups that deal with their affairs (Ring, 2009).

The Due process in the judicial system should enable the police officers to acquire a public hearing, the officers should be able to assess their bosses during the presentation of evidence to ensure that all the facts pertaining to the evidence are covered. A police officer should be granted the opportunity to provide witnesses and the accompanying evidences to defend their case in a court of law. Due process also requires that all the rights of criminal justice such as right to a free and fair hearing, and legal representation should be made accessible to every person in the society regardless of their profession, police officers are therefore not an exemption when it comes to this. The ruling by the court on a case against a police officer should be entirely based on the evidenced produced during the court proceedings (Ring, 2009).

The element of due process traverses other issues that are job related such as promotion and demotion. It also finds its place when an officer obtains a personal property through ways that are questionable and therefore proper investigations are deemed necessary to determine the actual facts behind the case (Yoshino, 2006)

References

Ring, K. (2009). Scalia Dissents: Writings of the Supreme Court’s Wittiest, Most Outspoken Justice. Washington: Regnery. ISBN 0-89526-053-0.

Yoshino, K. (2006). “The Pressure to Cover: The New Civil Rights”. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved 2010-05-01. Discussing potential of liberty rights to overtake equality rights.