Ethical Questions in Cloning, Essay Example

For the couple who have been having difficulty in having children, cloning is seen as the best way to have a second child or better still a twin child. This happens because sometimes a woman can be born without uterus or develops some complications that make them unable to produce eggs .In such unique conditions, people can get children using their own DNA and by the assistance of surrogate mothers. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association Report argue that it enables the people to experience the joy and benefits of parent hood when the natural conditions made it impossible for having children of the same genetic pattern. Cloning has also been used to produce body spare parts that can be transplanted to produce an effective body organ that is resistance to such diseases as Alzheimer, and Parkinson disease. As such it has been argued that the process of cloning makes it possible to cure many degenerative diseases (Eibert, 2003).

Having noted those benefits that come with cloning, the opinions of those that want the process of cloning to be regulated and be limited have a point to. Some of the arguments for its limited use of cloning include the fact that the process introduces some unknown physical harm. Other important factors that make it hard for me to accept cloning is the unknown psychosocial harm it comes with such as lose of privacy and violation of autonomy. When it comes to Sanctity of life, there is a thin line whether the person created by cloning will be a full human being or an object that has been created scientifically (Council of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 2005).

Works Cited

Council of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Family: A Proclamation to the  World. UT: Salt Lake City. 2005. Ethics of Human Cloning. Harvard university press. 2007.

Question two

Alders interpretation of Nietzsche’s will power philosophy

The will to power feature more prominently on the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, who has influenced many western societies. His argument was that the concept of will power is the main driving force in the human being. It is the elements that determine such things as individual ambition and achievements of goals as people try to achieve the highest position that they can achieve on earth. Nietzsche’s philosophy indicates that the commitments to values are what make them valuable. This is because there is not truth in values since the truth that is found in real life is not naturally lovable. As such the only authentic thing is for individuals to look deep inside to define what one is and is becoming in the society (Moore, 2002). The decisions that are made are what make an individual move forward not deliberation s and plans or knowledge about the future. The power of the will make things happens.

Alfred Adler incorporated the concept of the will to power into the philosophy of ‘individual psychology’. But he argued that the will to power is not necessarily natural to human being but is a s a result of therapeutic pattern that is adopted by individual to deal with the demand that arise in the society (Wolfgang 2006). On his part, Alders argues that the striving to find life is what primarily drives and motivate people. He therefore came up with the will to meaning concept. This was to take care of holistic the psychological well being of a person as well as the social equality. He therefore argued that one need to look at the whole society as whole in order to overcome such elements that come with inferiority and superiority complex.

Work cited

Moore, G., Nietzsche, Biology, Metaphor. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2002.

Wolfgang M., “The Organism as Inner Struggle: Wilhelm Roux’s Influence on Nietzsche,” in Nietzsche: His Philosophy of Contradictions and the Contradictions of His Philosophy, trans. David J. Parent (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2006), 161–82