Explaining the Faulty Lines of the God Delusion, Essay Example

Best selling as his book is, Richard Dawkin’ argument on how God is non-existing could be questioned for so many reasons. Focusing on three of his arguments, this response hopes to create a viable definition of why an existing God is not only a possibility but a fact.

The first argument by Dawkin imposes on the capacity of humans to be satisfied, balanced and moral all on their own because of their intelligence. Notably, he acknowledges that humans are intelligent. No creation can simply become as intelligent as humans are if they have simply come from single-celled organisms into the humans that they have become. Relatively, the development, although suggested by the theory of evolution to be true, cannot be fully supported by scientific suggestions as well considering that the complexity of the human mind cannot be fully compared to the creatures it was suggested to have developed from. Cognitive development may have convinced some that evolution itself is true. Nevertheless, the same process specifically negates such matter as it refines the procedure by which one becomes fully equipped to immediately adapt to a process of living through a well-processed manner of thinking.

The second argument that Dawkin presents is that of the idea that natural selection and the scientific theories that prove it is a more reliable source of consideration over life other than the extensive consideration over the possibility of the God-theory. Notably, it could be realized how non-familiar Dawkin is when it comes to the evaluative presentations of science with regards the different elements that science itself cannot explain especially when it comes to the human mind. Relatively, the theorists continue to explore to be able to define life and all the elements existing alongside it. The process of creation on the other hand suggests that there is someone who has more superior capacities than humans hence making it harder for humans to explain such vast knowledge. The well defined details that such a creator used to make intricate definitions of life both human and non-human specifies the fact that intelligence more than the capacity of what humans can explain exists.

The third argument Dawkin believes is that atheism or the belief that there is no God is an evidence of a healthy, independent mind. The capacity of humans to think should in itself be considered a strong evidence of a creator. The arrogant way humans present themselves as superior creations have made it possible for natural destructions to occur. Feeling that they have control over everything has caused humans to lose a lot of important matters which they are expected to take good care of. One of which is the beauty of nature. Human often think tha that they have the solution for everything, noting that as independent thinkers, they will always have the solution for any problem they may have made. This course of independence has often lead to problematic paths that humans had to deal with through the years. A specific evidence of such is global warming. Due to the human desire to satisfy their needs and their supposed “dreams” of advancements, the careless approaches to modernity has caused them to manifest a sense of independence that lead to disastrous results; a matter that could have been avoided if humans treated matters with respect in response to the one who created everything and made life possible on earth, God.