Frankenstein, Research Paper Example

In the famous gothic novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, Victor Frankenstein is the actual monster in the story, and not the creature himself. Victor in the novel as the main character was brought up in Geneva where he had developed powerful interest in reading the literature of the ancient and the old-fashioned alchemists, and was thrilled by the “secret life” and science. After some time, he decided that he wanted to further his education and in the process of learning, he came up with a person who he creates using strange chemicals and old body parts. When he had finished creating the creature, it emerged that the creature was an ugly beast. All through the novel Frankenstein, the monster shows more human attributes than his maker Dr. Frankenstein. Dr. Frankenstein seems less human than his making since he abandons his own making and he fails to be ready for the outcomes of his experiment. As the monster moves through the novel looking for company and recognition, Dr. Frankenstein totally declines to offer any assistance anticipated of a parent or maker. Whilst the monster looks like a human in his endeavors to socialize with his peers, Dr. Frankenstein symbolizes the outrage, which takes place when humans interfere with life (Shelley 76).

Nevertheless, not basically a stock representation for a component of Frankenstein’s awareness, the creature also demonstrates a natural and naive man who emerges to be the victim of his social conditions since his responses to the hardships he experiences with negative feelings. After being persuaded of the De Lacey’s high level of decency of temperament, the monster tries to bring in him into their lives with catastrophic outcomes. In their refusal, the creature observes and encounters the negations in human behavior when Felix assaults him without questioning him his story and Safie runs from the chalet without stopping to help Agatha who had fainted upon meeting the monster. The creature, nonetheless, is not merely a victim of his socio-political conditions. He also chooses to respond in abhorrence and resentment to his immediate environment and to permit the complete play of his emotions meant for revenge (Shelley113).

In addition, the Monster is subjected to an immense character full of abandonment and isolation by his maker, which eventually result to cognitive injure leading to a numeral disagreements. Starting from the time he grew up, to the passing away of Frankenstein, this monster in no way had role models to be examples to mold him on how to live on earth. Therefore, lack of parents or mentors to mould the creature and make him fit into society and learn the social rules made the creature to be dangerous in the society since it destroyed many lives. Adler, in his Personality Theories, abandon is “a type of maltreatment that refers to the failure to provide needed age-appropriate care” (Engler 286).

Because the Creature is abandoned all through the novel, he has to assume skills and survival tactics to school himself via the reading and writing, and pay attention to others. Therefore, some of the appraisal of Victor, it argues that, “The consequence is, the giant, who was at primary, basing on his description, however a undisruptive monster, turns to be violent and wicked, in result of looking for all possible avenues to individual culture kept away with harmful aggression and unpleasant marks of repulsion.” If he grew with sufficient care of the parents, he would not develop to fierceness and violence as observed via the perception of an individual (Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 1). Therefore, it can be argued that it the Monster Creature fails to desire both his maker and role model in his existence, since he performs; it is Frankenstein who fails to desire whatever thing in his disposal. In turn after the failure of Victor to tame his creation and make it become a social creature, the creature turns harmful to the members of the society. Victor should have taken control of the creature and train it to adopt social skills, which could have averted any possible elements of violence, whom Victor become of the victims in the society.

Furthermore, the creature came to realize that all he encounters with in the society hates him, whom comprises his sole father and due to the isolation the creature the creature had experienced, he decides to commit activities that amounted to brutality. The creature became an enemy of everyone in the society. This made the members of the society hate the creature more and more. This means if he had been taught about what is right and wrong by the creator by introducing to the social skills and aspects, then his harmless nature in the society could have made him to be acknowledged in the society in spite of his gigantic nature. Therefore, the creature created Victor lacked any social bearing that could have enabled him to socialize with the world (Shelley 83).

Therefore, socialization is an all-time social understanding by which people in the world expand their individual prospective and study culture. In the instance of Vitor, the Creature has no social skill since it was isolated and lacked the parental guidance that could have allowed him develop the aspect of socialization. This implies that despite understanding how to commune with other members of the society, he also lacks cognitive skills that play a leading role in promoting communication skills. As time elapses, the preoperational phase sets up. At this stage, he learns the conceptual that are related to signs (Macionis 62). For instance, the Creature originally sets for a trip into the jungle of Ingolstadt to feel how the world at large feels “He discovered the use of fire and various other rudiments of knowledge and socialization; and thus accomplished, he ventured forth into the great world” (Quarterly Review 1).

The creature having no idea about fire goes on to experiment with fire because he was in the mission of wanting to know the outside world. Every moment he meets an individual, he depict him as the monster and he starts to fear him. As a result, the creature because he lacks any communication skills cannot express himself to the people and for the fact no one in the society is willing to offer him a chance to communicate and assist in all the ways he deserved to be trained. Therefore, since he lacks the aspect of socialization, which are vital elements for interaction and experiencing life for the Creature becomes hard.

In addition, this develops hostility and develops aggression since he fails to pass any information anyone or use even symbols to communicate. This, therefore, affected the interaction process, which is attributed to lack of the socially skills that are vital for the communication process. He is reasoning that his manner of contact is to obtain vengeance on his maker, Frankenstein, by killing his relatives, because the mode of communication, could the only channel he had. This implies that the Creature in the novel had to compensate the lack of social skills through revenge in order to communicate. Therefore, if Victor had taught the Creature social skills during the early stages, then things could have not been the way it eventually assumed in the novel. Conversely, whilst wandering into the woods, he encounters a small structure, similar to a hut. He finds some place to rest so that he could communicate with the family members, and in the process learning a lot of new things. Consequently, he constructs the contraption that the people had a definite technique of relaying their emotions and experiences to each other by expressive sounds. Therefore, this becomes a major breakthrough for the Creature as he was in the outside world. The Creature understood the phrases made by the people in the family as, in some cases generating an element of grin or sadness, pleasure or pain, in the thinking and tolerance of the observers. In general, the Creature well read from the perspectives of communal life that it developed, to esteem their values, and to denounce the association of human being (Shelley 87).

In getting an almost full concept of communication ability while he was in the outside world of how to reason and at the same time learn, read, and communicate, the Creature was now the last stages of development. The last stage during development of communication skills is development of cognitive skills. When the Creature had clearly understood the approach of life through communicating and listening, which he had understood before, he considered it an achievement. Since was still isolating and detesting the individual because of his aggression and appearance, he asks Victor to look for him a female companion so that they can live together, communicate, and socialize hence promoting his social skills?

In conclusion, nonetheless, from the novel, in the absence of social experiences and skills, a person will not have the capacity to think, feel, as well as significance as seen throughout the novel ‘Frankenstein,’ by Shelley (Shelley 88). Furthermore, abandon, isolation, and short of communication proficiency constitute the outcomes of his aggressive as well as brutal activities in the ‘Frankenstein.’ With no appropriate parenting, outcomes such as the violence common in the main character are culpable. This implies that the parents or mentors play a crucial in promoting development of the social skills that are necessary for interaction and well-being in the society. Development of a person is inspired by going through the diverse stages of development, and consequently, stresses how individuals see, process, interact, and responds to facts in the immediate surroundings. If the being was basically raise through the main phases of growth, possibly his manners of aggression all through the story might emerge to be evaded, although it is not easy know. Therefore, it is evident that Creature in the novel lacked social skills that are vital for meaningful interaction with other members of the society, hence eliminating any possible social ills likely to develop.

Works Cited

Engler, Barbara. Personality Theories. 6th ed. Ed. Charles Hartford. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003. Print.

Frankenstein. Dir. James Whale. Universal Pictures, 1931.

Macionis, John J. Society: The Basics. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NY: Pearson Education Incorporation, 2004 print.

Quarterly Review. Ed. Neil Fraistat, Steven E. Jones. U of Maryland. 20 February 2013. < http://www.rc.umd.edu/reference/mschronology/reviews/qrrev.html>

Scott, Walter. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine. Ed. Neil Fraistat, Steven E. Jones. U of Maryland. 24 February 2004.

Shelley, Mary W. Frankenstein. Ed. Susan J. Wolfson. New York: Pearson Education Incorporation, 2003 print.