Global Investment Funds, Business Plan Example

Global investment funds and selections. A variety of global investment funds selection are described on here for the purpose to see which investment fund is a good of use to invest into endowment fund for a university. Namely, Exchange traded funds ETFs. iShares Gold Trust (partially ETF) which means that they do not proceed in compliance with the Investment Company Act, but they share their marketing behaviors of the gold bullion and expose its marketing dollars during trading period; Thus, in turn, stakeholders’ portfolio can diversify their shares in order to protect their potential shares from inflation. Stakeholders may see their portfolio improves its investment by 2.01% of returns in the year five unless the fixed administration costs remains the same, for example, management fees and other expenses of administrative activities may not need  to pay fundraising fees. Another type of fund of interest, MSCI Global Metals and Mining under the American Stock Exchange: RING., which is activated under ETF. This investment fund is also under the commodities which are explained later on under the Investment Fund Commodities section. Another similar investment fund that is diversifiable and earnable. The Ishares Silver, in a similar fashion, they are obligated to change their diversified portfolio if there is an index that can maximize more dollars into the account and at the same time to help block the inflation against the portfolio. Those ETFs investment types can be taken into consideration on how they would be evaluated in a methodical manner.  In this case, investment policy for endowment fund is different in content of measuring the factor intensities. In terms of factor intensities in supply and demand in action -factor-intensity reversal occurs when there are two predicting trading flows in two separate funds at different relative factor prices. This is to say, for instance, Russell 2000 Small Cap US index (SD= 15.18) with no risk of return while EAFE Small Cap Index (SD =14.39) has 15% of risk with return of 9.27. It is necessary to say that the demand for the Russell 2000 Small Cap US index do not meet the amended policy of 8.7% of real return, therefore , EAFE Small Cap Index may unexpectedly give the endowment fund a generous return in equities.

According to American Psychological Association that defined the term, socioeconomic status (SES), as a class of social standing or class of an individual or group to which measures three subclass components from the aspects of economic development: education, income, and occupation. Researchers usually measures the inequities in access to resources, plus issues related to privilege, power and control. The best theory approach to use to examine the individual’s socioeconomic status is super’s life-span theory because Super hypothesized the timing of the disability during a person’s career development and identified three different career development processes as the factors of household income: those with precareer-onset , those with midcareer-onset , and those with progressive or episodic handicapped. One of the important needs for the precareer-onset is the lack of workplace preparation. 46% experience a drop while other 54% reached a disparity in income growth, the mean real income rose to 90^th percentile of workers have increased their income level after graduation from the university.  This analysis is used for a purpose of analyzing the psychological side of funds being contributed and or investing the endowment funds on the behalf of stakeholders.  In addition, a life development therapist, Donald Super, whose work referred to this  “minicycle,” as an activity involve the recycling of new growth, exploration, and establishment tasks. That is, under any circumstance that an individual may have aged the diagnosis of, “ mutual fund portfolio” which is affecting his or her  investment funding management decision, in a such retrospective sense. The investment committee should acknowledged the importance of understanding the effects of each episode or change in functional abilities on the individual’s attitudes about investment funds. Apart from the fact, the approach in analyzing factors in content has implied the factors of production. Specifically, it is difficult to categorize a factor that fits to the capital intensive or labor intensive, so what method is good to use to identify which of which fits to either group is by examining the reversal of a country that the imported goods were labored intensively and that relatively exported goods were capital intensive. This notion thus conform that H-O theorem when the goods are exported from a country but not the other country do not account to the H-O theorem.  In addition, to better clarify on how this H-O of Leontief paradox on the matters of intensity in reverse that has validated the rule altogether. For instance, suppose alternative investments of Asia Developed RE and Europe Developed use 2008 and 2012 data for 40 industries. Take that into consideration of those 40 industries have been estimated the K/L ratio employed in each country Asia and Europe in each of the 40 industries then rank them in order in descending order based on the K/L ratios rule. Instead, using the countries, we use investment funds in this matter, so that tells us that if we want to see returns with low risks in commodities, private equity, mutual funds, and master limited partnerships. For example, the capital and labor (K/L) ratio is ranked in order from highest to the lowest. In the group of REIT investment fund: Europe ranked first, Cohen & Steers ranked 2, Mortgage RE Capped ETF number 6, International Developed RE number 11, and Asia Developed RE number 16, and so forth. That is if the factor-intensity reversal method is not in the analysis, then the rankings for Europe equalizes the rankings for the U.S.(Note: If two rankings are identical, the correlation coefficient between them is 1.0; if they are perfectly opposite to each other, the coefficient is —1.0; and if there is no association between the two rankings whatsoever, the rank correlation coefficient is 0.).

Alternative investment funds. A leontief paradox is used to analyze the aggregate capital and labor on developing countries of Asia Developed RE with SD of 18.19, and Europe Developed with SD of 14.90 and International Developed RE with SD of 15.36. This data is predicated by the total fixed costs for imports and exports businesses spent over $1 million dollars, but to give an estimate on the expenses spent on exports would produce fair value in generating values over time. A hypothesize for all of the three countries with their authorities’ sponsors would suggest that there are economic factors that may impede from limiting the costs to spend on capital and labor, for example, in between year 1 and year 3, the spending limit is estimated around at 2.25 Million dollars’ worth of capital and 182.3 years of labor time of $14,000 per labor year. GIven that estimate of ratio  (K/L)m which refers to imports and (K/L)x refers to exports. A greater than 1.0 would indicate that the country is growing economically. In other words, the cost on labor exceeds the expectations for retaining the costs to spend for exporting business. So, the idea is that for investing endowment fund for the university, it is best to find out whether there are funds available, disproportionate aside for exporting products, such as ESOL English textbooks. This type of test is of the Leontief H-O theorem known as the Leontief paradox by author Wassily W. Leontief. This H-O theorem test is a must evaluation test and the first test to conduct before using other empirical marketing statistics tests because of the competitive industries state of economic health can be seen of input and output purchases inflows to other industries on a table, an input-output table, in addition, the total direct factors and its requirements may be used to see the sales of goods sold. But, this is an idea on how this theory works. Moreover, the risk of return for Asia is 40% higher than Europe and 20% for International. Investment Fund Commodities. MSCI Global Metals and Mining of ishares have same objective goals for maximizing global companies’ equities and diversify on production: metals excluding gold and silver. MSCI do not work with RING anymore, they now work with PICK. They, because of the tasks involving work on diversifying, extracting, and producing the metals and minerals to gain access to the global metals marketing. MSCI EAFE Index standard deviation is 14.25 compared to US standard deviation is 0.00. This tells us that this investment is not widely popular in the US, but other parts of the world. Also, it may be competitive for some industries in metal sector and metal production. Another alternative investment fund option is Ishares Silver. While, there is no other existing commodity funds on silver because the value of silver is lower than metals, minerals, and gold.  Ishares Silver represents SLV of the World Exchange Traded Funds. However, they do not perform fully as in compliance with the Investment Company Act which is noted on the Exchange Traded Funds section.

The rationale for investors to expect their portfolio balance is by extending the monetary approach to include four financial asset characteristics: (1) Financial markets are well integrated in terms of stimulus economy, of both domestic and foreign. (2) Although, individual investment assets regards as imperfect substitutes, in particular, the risk associate with holding of foreign financial assets could be generated to foreign assets which attaches positive risk premium for foreign assets. (3) Investors holding assets should have objective in maximizing the return on their asset portfolio as a whole, stand ready to switch out of one type of asset and into another whenever events occur that alter the expected returns on various assets. The portfolio balance would adjust the variability from the exchange rate scale. (4) in addition, the importance of investor expectations regarding to future asset prices whereby forward-looking, utility maximizing investors utilize all available relevant information and a knowledge of how the economy and exchange markets work in order to form forecast for endowment funds. Given that the asset model that specifies the functions for each investment fund. To simplify the input for the money supplying the funds by the external forces. For instance, two bonds are usually treated as exogenous as the government securities can clear the policy which affects the volume of securities in existence. Though, if the bonds are private securities the issuance may be affected by external forces as well. Like the US and Non-US Fixed Income (bonds) with low returns 4.0%, and the risk is  around 2.7%  and Emerging Markets Fixed Inc (bonds) with 7.2% and the risk is 7.8% which is fairly unfavorable for this type of investment for university endowment fund. But, if the committee accepts the idea of evaluating the exchange rate overshooting. “Overshooting occurs when, in moving from one equilibrium but then returns to it. The first explanation of overshooting are of two key phenomena—-short-run asset market behavior and long-run PPP behavior. In this context it means that there is no effect on world interest rates; and, as it is assumed that financial assets are perfect substitutes with no risk premium of perfect capital mobility. Then, the exchange rate “overshoots” these assumptions are without risk premium when financial assets are the capital substitutes. How do we want to interpret the monetary and portfolio balance approaches to make an optimal decision on which investment fund will give a good returns with no risk premium? A discussion on variety of models to evaluate the maximum percentage of diversified returns associate with risks have tell us on the characteristics and behaviors that we should be caution on about on which investment fund is worth investing and in what terms should the funds to be release for a sustainable purpose. The models discussed on here are: The Leontief paradox, H-O theorem, factor-intensity, and capital substitutes. These models have its own rules which reflects to the investment policy. We retract the statements as they are purported for the investors and committee to look at the conditions for consideration: Most importantly, thisan input-output table of the total direct factors and its requirements may be used to see the sales of goods sold. But, this is an idea on how this theory works. Moreover, the risk of return for Asia is 40% higher than Europe and 20% for International. Investment Fund Commodities. Compared to the MSCI EAFE Index standard deviation is 14.25 compared to US standard deviation is 0.00. This tells us that this investment is not widely popular in the US, but other parts of the world.For example, in between year 1 and year 3, the spending limit is estimated around at 2.25 Million dollars’ worth of capital and 182.3 years of labor time of $14,000 per labor year. They, because of the tasks involving work on diversifying, extracting, and producing the metals and minerals to gain access to the global metals marketing. Like the US and Non-US Fixed Income (bonds) with low returns 4.0%, and the risk is  around 2.7%  and Emerging Markets Fixed Inc (bonds) with 7.2% and the risk is 7.8% which is fairly unfavorable for this type of investment for university endowment fund. But, if the committee accepts the idea of evaluating the exchange rate overshooting. Now, we should analyze the conditions for 15 year correlation Matrix compared to covariance matrix, because in the stock exchange, they change overtime because of the information technology trends change the attitudes of monetary funds to be handled differently in the marketing. It does not matter if the capital is fixed. This is the reasons why these financial assets are being assessed for substitutes to offset the liability for the demand. Besides, a different type of fund of interest is the hedge funds. In those 15 years, hedge have moved upward and downward in large cap securities and equities except for the fixed bonds to be restricted from earnings as their principal of operating hedge funds are different from open market investment funds. The model called, ‘the exchange rate pass-through’ is a good example of hedge funds performance and conditions. Given that the desire for change in expenditures is highly searchable source for this type of university fund plan. As we know how short-run elasticities tends to take small commitments from the changes in exchange rate market. On the other side, the demand side, have the tendency to make commitment to the relative price of currency.

Another consideration to obtain a strategy to limit expendisure on fixed costs is the pegged rate system. The government fix the pricce of their currency and stand ready to support the fixed price in the foreign exchange market (government intervention). The government have to intervene the currency from raising the price to a level that can cause inflation. Under a pegged rate system, when a foreign currency turns to a threat to the exchange rate price to go up beyond the limit the governement locked the band of exchange rate, only if the demand has increased in volume. The affect to other foreign countries is to stand ready to make a purchase on a srong foreign and domestic currency and sell foreign currency while domestic currency is weak. Similar to the stock market, on how they watch the value of dollars changes during the trading period. Therefore, this system have to be in order to maintain the pegged value. In fact, in 2006, many countries had changed their exchange rate regime by changing the currency board  and the nature of the boards under the Europrean Union. The number of countries using a targeted exchange rate program with an explicit peg or a peg with a narrow band increased from 8 to 9. The largest growth occurred in the managed float category which increased from 7 countries to 12 countries. The biggest reduction came in the floating rate category, where there was a a decline from 8 counries to 2.  In a keynesian income model, the focus is on aggregate spending in the entire economy. But, we do not have to use this on here, but we can derive the illustration into the entire investment funds, instead. The desired expenditures on the economy’s goods and services as the fixed costs or capital substitutes as recalled earlier on the subject. In an open-economy Keynesian model, is consist of a time period of product volume or consumer spending by the economy’s households on goods and services, and investment spending by industries, and government spending on goods and services , and export spending by foreign citizens on the country’ products, and finally domestic import spendings. The model havehypothersized that the product volume is the amount of income.