Healthcare Bill, Essay Example

Your Name
  1. Non-governmental insurance and the ACA (Be sure to consider the underlying social and economic issues of this kind of health insurance today AND the distinctions between profit and non-profit insurance).


Feature or issue What underlying conditions led to the bill containing this feature? What does this feature imply? Your opinion
Control of benefits due to withstanding health status of beneficiaries Most private insurance organizations provide a limited access to benefits to their policy holders. The structured conditions on whether or not their case is to be issued an insurance support is to be strongly avoided by the new healthcare assistance act.


This aspect of the act’s imposed change could receive both a positive and negative feedback from both the public and the private insurance policy providers. Basically, the reason behind the implication of limitations in the benefits is based upon the desire of leveling the release of funds to those who rightfully need assistance. This feature of the act though could lessen the burden on those who seem to be having issues in getting the benefits they need especially if they are in dire need of financial support for healthcare purposes.
Generalization of benefits regardless of health condition and other underlying issues related to the case The act specifically points out how everyone deserves to be given the rightful assistance that they need especially when it comes to healthcare.



The generalization of the benefits provided through the insurance assistance structured within the new health care act is specifically aiming to create a more refined indication on what the act is for and what adjustments it shall make in how ever citizen of the country is served with his or her healthcare needs regardless of the possible discriminative points that he/she may have.
  1. Medicare and the  ACA ( Be sure to consider include privatization, and the future of Medicare


Feature or issue What underlying conditions led to the bill containing this feature? What does this feature imply? Your opinion
Enhanced medicare and medicated integrity provisions The act insists on the redirection of the process by which all owners of Medicare and Medicaid polices are to be given proper attention to under the application of the act. There were instances in the past when the recognition of the provisionary benefits of Medicare policies is neglected by healthcare providers. In the case of implementing the effects of the act in the country, it is expected that such benefits shall be better considered and recognized in a much better condition than before.
Pharmacy benefit management Discounts on pharmacological supplies to the owners of Medicare policies are to be further implicated properly for application. Pharmacological supplies could be somewhat expensive. At some point, there are instances when patients with ailments have a hard time recovering due to the expensive amounts of such supplies. Relatively, this aspect of the act shall provide a more comprehensive way of protecting the rights of the patients to discounted supplies hence aiding their fast recovery.
  1. Medicaid and the  ACA  (be sure to consider the underlying issue that led to the bill’s features)


Feature or issue What underlying conditions led to the bill containing this feature? What does this feature imply? Your opinion
Additional Medicaid program integrity provisions

Medicaid agencies must exclude individuals or entities from participating in Medicaid contributions within a specified period of time given that:

a)    The owner has failed to repay overpayments

b)    The owner is suspended from participating in any Medicaid program

c)     The owner is affiliated with an individual who has been suspended from Medicaid participation.

This provision of the act insists a more constructive approach in protecting the capability of a Medicaid policy holder to prolong his benefits from the program. It specifically entails to note that there are instances when policy holders incur particular failures that should be recognized by the organization hence should be given an ample leeway to reestablish their reputation as members of the insurance provider’s list of beneficiaries. This provision is specifically protective of the fact that there are unforeseen occurrences that make a Medicaid policy holder unable to pay contributions within a specific span of time. In line with this the act hopes to provide a leeway for individuals undergoing such difficulties. While it does provide a good essence of protection, it also could impose a wrong notion on how Medicaid could actually support the needs of other members if a relative number of their holders undergo the said reputation-recognition for leeway payment programs.
Expands eligibility for Medicaid to lower income individuals and extends responsibility of assistance as federal role


Extending Medicaid programs to lower income individuals specifically increase the capability of the program to provide wider assistance to a much larger scope of population in the society. More shall be benefited in this feature of the act. Relatively, the strength in assuring the society with ample source of assistance offered even to lower-income individuals shall make this program widely acceptable. However, precautions should be taken by the administrators in insisting this part of the act.
  1. FINAL OPINION AND REASSESSMENT  (use ordinary APA style considering your  lists below as your reference page):

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act specifically increase the capability of the public administration to extend its capacity to make the society it protects a stronger community. Relatively, the provision of better healthcare assistance program empowers the people to perform better and become more involved in community-advancement programs. This act specifically calls for an investment that is directed to the people which will later on benefit the country as a whole. There could be some flaws to the act, but it could not be denied that such limitations could be managed properly if given proper attention as the act itself develops to adjust within the society to where it should be implemented.



Reference List:


Barry, CL; Huskamp HA (2011). “Moving beyond Parity- Mental Health and Addiction Care under the ACA“. New England Journal of Medicine 365:11.

Druss, BG; Mauer BJ (2010). “Health Care Reform and Care at the Behavioral Health–Primary Care Interface”. Psychiatr Serv 61: 1087-1092.

Garfield, RL; Zuvekas SH, Lave JR, Donohue JM (2011). “The impact of national health care reform on adults with severe mental disorders”. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168:486-494.

Leonhardt, David (March 2010). “In Health Bill, Obama Attacks Wealth Inequality“. The New York Times.