How Do You Evaluate a Scientific Hypothesis? Essay Example

Critical thinking is used significantly in the judiciary branch of the government. It is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to analyze the Constitution and to determine whether a law has been broken based on this document as evidence. It is apparent from the different opinions put forth by each court justice that there are many different interpretations plausible for this document. The critical thinking put forth by each judge becomes more apparent when they must debate with one another to demonstrate their mode of thinking. As a consequence, they are required to digest each other’s arguments and based on this information and generate a final decision that will impact the legislation of the federal government and of the states. Overall, critical thinking is what dictates court decisions.

A scientific hypothesis is evaluated by generating a procedure that can be used to confirm or deny the hypothesis. In doing so, the procedure must have adequate controls and variables that are representative of the scientific question being studied. If researchers did not evaluate hypotheses, we would not be able to definitively claim that we have found answers to scientific questions. Even though research procedures could effectively generate results, the mere fact that we are not able to compare this data to a potential claim indicates that the work has not been driven by a particular aim. If we wish to learn more about the world around us, it is imperative for us to determine a plausible hypothesis so we are able to know that the research we design has the ability to prove or disprove a corresponding claim. This is necessary to ensure scientific progress.