Immigration Reform and Control Act of 19986, Essay Example

This coursework will review the liberal, moderate and conservative perspectives for the new immigration reforms which are centered on the IRCA (immigration reform and control act of 1986). The perspectives will be exploredfrom the position of three internet sites. The sites are authored by Ball (2013) and Kim (2014).

IRCA 1986

The Public Legislative Act 99- 603 of 1986 had been ratified with the goal of administrating and stopping undocumented immigrants from reaching the United States. The primary provisions in this legislation require the regularization of the non-registered immigrants who have been in the United States since 1982. This public legislative act also provides for the legalization of particular agricultural employees and requires penalties for employers who willfully contract undocumented immigrant employees. The Public Act 99- 603 also makes provisions for enhanced supervision of the border zones of the United States (U.S.D.H.S., 2014).

Liberal Immigration Reform Perspective

A comprehensive immigration reform plan which had been ratified in 2013 now faces an unsecure future. In the near future, the primary issue for the liberal proponents of immigration reform will be finding support in the House of Representatives which is presently dominated by a Republican majority. In the background, the liberal proponents of immigration reform have been looking to find support from the liberal immigration reform advocates who perceive the present legislation as being overly partial toward the security of the border zones of the United States and not demonstrating sufficient concern for the rights of the undocumented immigrants (Ball, 2013).

This anxiety has taken place in the aftermath of the negotiations which facilitated the legislation´s extensive margin of senate ratification. The bipartisan group which is composed of eight senators achieved a negotiation of the modification of the previous bill by Senator Bob Corker and Senator John Hoeven. These gentlemen are two of the Republican senators who facilitated the allocation of twenty thousand border security personnel, twenty billion dollars in funding and over seven hundred miles of border security walls. Senator Corker described this initiative as being excessive from the perspective of the liberal proponents of immigration reform (Ball, 2013).

The liberal advocates of immigrationreform detailed this initiative as being a symbol of violation, death and abuse for the inhabitantsof the border areas. Many of the liberal immigration reform advocates are against the Corker – Hoeven initiative. The liberal immigration reform advocates are against the implementation of the initiative. The liberal immigration reform advocates debate that the Corker – Hoeven initiative would cause damage to the immigrant´s human rights and the economies of the border zones. The Corker – Hoeven initiative would cause the immigrants’ process of legalization to become more burdensome and expensive. .Furthermore the liberal immigration reform advocates debate that there would be an increased atmosphere of inhibition and fear caused by the surveillance initiatives. . The liberal immigration reform advocates are supported by the organizations of United We Dream, Credo Action and MoveOn.org(Ball, 2013).

Many of the advocates of the immigration reform are doubtful that immigration reform will be ratified without the initiatives which have been proposed by Senator Corker and Senator Hoeven. Many of the liberal proponents perceive that the Corker -Hoeven initiative is necessary due to the fact that the legalization of over twenty million residents in the six state area which compose the zone known as La Voz de Aztlan could potentially place the sovereignty of the United States in jeopardy (Ball, 2013).

Moderate Immigration Reform Perspectives

The democratic liberal proponents of immigration reform are pressuring President Obama to apply executive authority in order to deter the deportation of undocumented illegal immigrants. The moderate immigration reform proponents do not believe that this is an effective strategy. Representative Henry Cuellar of Texas believes that President Obama is overextending his executive authority. The moderate proponents of immigration reform perceive that President Obama should not be allowed to take any executive action with regards to the mass deportation of undocumented immigrants without Congress. Representative Dan Lipinski (IL) is a moderate immigration reform who is an advocate of deterring President Obama from exercising executive on immigration reform. Representative Lipinski believes that an executivedeportation action would create more issuers than would be resolved. Many of the moderate immigration reform proponents consider that executive action would remove the legislative authority from Congress. The moderate immigration reform advocates believe that Congress needs to reassert its authority as being an equal and representative branch of government (Kim, 2014).

The Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, is directing an evaluation of the manner by which the enforcement of immigration is concluded by the Obama administration. The moderate immigration reform proponents would like an amplification of a 2012 directive which was issued by Obama administration that would provide relief to the undocumented and illegal residents who have committed no serious transgression. This 2012 directive has the objective of proving the undocumented immigrant residents with permits to work in the United States (Kim, 2014).

Conservative Perspective on Immigration

Many of the conservative proponent immigration reform are looking for an implementation in the immigration reform policy which would be in alignment with the National Defense authorization act. This is a legislative bill which provides an annual review of the national defense policies. The bill proposes to provide legal immigration status to unregistered aliens who would subscribe to military service to the United States armed forces. These are youthful immigrants who wish to regularize their immigration status and service our nation. This enactment is designated the ENLIST Act which would be an initiative included in the National Defense Act(Kim, 2014).

The important legislative personnel recognize that if the immigration legislations are not proposed to Congress by the summer, the effort to implement immigration reform may not achieve success. President Obama is receiving pressure in order to decrease the number of deportations which have taken place during the past several months. The conservativelegislators have the intention of conferring with regards to immigration reform(Kim, 2014).

TheSenate ratified sweeping immigration reforms in 2012. The conservative representatives in the House have been reluctant with regards to accepting a substantial change in the immigration reform laws. This is attributed to concern about the legalization process for unregistered aliens in the UnitedStates. The conservatives were optimistic with regards to the statements of Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers, one of the leaders of the House Republican conference, gave a press release stating that is feasible that there will be immigration initiatives which will be produced for review in congress by the middle of the summer(Kim, 2014).

Interestsand Learning Goals

I have found it interesting that the liberals, moderates and conservative proponents of immigration reform agree that legislation is required in order to effectively address the immigration situation in the United States. I found it of great interest that many of the moderate immigration reform proponents shifted the topic of interest from immigration reform to President Obama´s executive authority in applying action on mass immigration enforcement without consulting with congress. I found the perspectives non immigration reform to be more progressive from the conservativethan the moderate members of Congress. I find it very interesting that the liberals and conservatives are in concurrence that immigration reform is necessary in the United States(Kim, 2014).

I found it very interesting that in the midst of the debates, many believe that the younger generation of immigrants should be able to stay and work in the United States. The ENLIST Act which has been proposed in the National Defense Act by the conservative immigration reform advocates is another interesting topic. The immigration debate is a hot topicwhich must be addressed. The reason that this subject must be addressed is that the situation composes a nation within a nation. There are over twenty million unregistered immigrants in the United States who are not registered. These characteristics cause the immigration challenge to be substantial. The issue which has been reviewed in these articles is that can the Corker- Hoevan Act resolve the national security problem which continues to be posed by unregister immigration into the United States(Kim, 2014).

The Corker- Hoeven act proposes investing over twenty billion dollars in resources and creating employment of over twenty thousand border security protection agents. These implementations would be added to over seven hundred miles of walls which would be placed along the border. The sociological impact of the solution may be worse than the immigration challenge itself. The immigration proposals are to be introduced to Congress in the summer of this year(Kim, 2014). Time will tell.

References

Ball, M. (2013). Are liberals turning on immigration reform? The Atlantic.

Kim, S. M. (2014). Conservatives revolt against Boehner on immigration. Politico.

Kim, S. M. (2014). Moderate Dems resist Obama on deportations. Politico.

U.S.D.H.S. (2014). Immigration reform and control act of 19986 (1RCA). United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.