International Relations: War and Peace, Essay Example

The principles allied to just war attempts to change the notion of war along with peace in to some questions with moral grounds. Consequently, a shift of international relations ahead of the realist perception is evident. According to the standpoint of a realist, war is considered to be a normal occurrence in the situation of unattractive verity with regard to international relations, an issue of national interest that is beyond reconciliation or a national policy requiring the sovereign government to take the prerogative of making the decision about the occurrence of war (Johnson, 2005 , 134-167).

War results to significant implications to the community as well as the entire families. War also affects the families of soldiers who are left back at home, always worrying about their family members deployed and they also face psychologically and emotional injuries.

With regard to the community at large, their food supplies are disrupted as a result of the damages caused to the infrastructure in agriculture. The families along with the are also disintegrated and therefore they cannot take active role in the day to day activities. Families are also displaces and consequently, the systems of education and the services of health are poorly disrupted. The systems of sanitation as well as water supply are also disrupted and the entire burden is carried by the families and their children. Due to the vulnerability of the children to such circumstances, the greater suffering is felt b the children. Poor communities also feel the impact of the war because they may be hindered from taking safety measures with the required urgency due to finance issues (Johnson, 2005 , 134-167).

Some tremendous costs are usually incurred to the soldiers as well as the civilians alike and it is usually a struggle that requires great efforts as well as. The consequences of the war are usually associated with total change in the lives of the soldiers with majority of them attempting to record the experiences that they go through in the course of the war.

Post war effects on the civilians usually include shortages in food because the war called for huge supply of food. This consequently results to the issue of black market trade in foodstuffs for the people with ability of paying higher prices for food. The nutrition of the people is thus affected and the growth in population was declines in most cases, many men are deployed in war leaving their wives behind. The females on the other hand are forced to participate in industries particularly those that deal with food for their survival. The effects of the war can also be looked at from the viewpoint of the human life that is lost in the process. So many people including the civilians and the military loss their lives during the war.

Women and their children are particularly impacted by the war. There are particular jobs that are usually abandoned by the women and these are the ones that men did. The soldiers together with their families undergo difficult times while experiencing trauma in addition to hardships in the instances of deployment to the war areas. The unknown projects high magnitudes of fear as well as stress to the soldiers as well as their families and this is consequential to high profile psychological as well as social implications. In some situation, the requirement for undergoing therapy arises among the soldiers as well as their families during the period of deployment as well as after the war. At the time that they join the forces, it is imperative that the soldiers along side their families have clear knowledge of the potential risks that are associated with the difficult situation and device appropriate mechanisms for preparations to meet the consequences (Walzer, 2000, 117-136).

The developmental aspects of the children are significantly affected by war. A possibility of sustaining injuries or even being killed cannot be overlooked. In some cases, the children are displaced from their communities as well as their families. They may become internal refugees or displaced people, they may also become orphaned, sexually abused or become subjects of exploitation. The children are also likely to be trauma victims which arise when they are made victims of violence. Education deprivation is also a possibility and the possibility of developing in to child soldiers is also true.

The probability for the children exposed to conflict regions to be denied the basic life necessities including shelter, health services, food and clothing among others is on its high profile. Such children are also exposed to slim chances of accessing relief aids due to lack of attention for minors protection. Exposure to such circumstances consequently bears negative effects to their future development.

Most victims of war scenario are usually from the families that are disadvantaged as a result of poverty. There are usually some permanent changes that resulted from war. The civilians in the also suffer greatly and also the men who serve in the military and there arises too much changes that resulted from the war (Walzer, 2000, 117-136).

It is appropriate to assert that the principles of “Just war” that strive to transform war along with peace into moral questions cannot be warranted under whatever condition. The failure of the principles to account for the damages as well as the extent of sufferings inflicted to the families of the soldiers contributes to its failure.

The principles of “just War” have been manifested in terrorists’ attacks and evaluation of the justice behind the campaigns of the terrorists is a complicated issue. The terrorists use tactical means that are tailored to waging war and sharp disputes arise in global politics in as far the issue is concerned. Irrespective of the sympathy that may be inspired from the civilian population, this form of just war is considered unjust as well as illegitimate. There lacks a rationality between the killing intentions directed to the innocents and the actions of the military of collateral damage. There is a fundamental aspect of the theory of just war which is also allied to the moral equivalence fallacy. This implies that the civilians targeted for killing shall remain so and irrespective of the circumstances, such killings must be avoided (Walzer, 2000, 117-136).

If the situation of an experience of war is put in a mirror, child soldier is a very conspicuous issue. It takes a long time to try and rebuild the lives of the people who are affected by war. Other people are forced to undergo programs of therapy as a result of the trauma associated with the war. The most suitable deductions at this juncture is that the thinking of just war is a beginning as well as a hope at the same time and war can be considered to be cultural occurrence rather relative to human fate

Works cited

Johnson, James Turner. Just War, As It Was, and Is. First Things 149 (2005): 14–24. 2005.

Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books. 2000.