Jane Springer Reports on “Genocide”, Essay Example

This research will aid Jane Springer’s new book “Genocide,” which examines the life of genocides. Springer covers all of this and more in her book, and this book also commemorates the victims of the Holocaust.

The author discusses some of the issues surrounding genocide. Later in the text, it gets more specific when these topics are discussed in depth. Slavery is not new, according to Springer (2006). Genocide is the mass murder of a people. To put it simply, genocide is the deliberate killing of an entire community or group of people. The term “genocide” has evolved, and its meaning has been debated. People with HIV/AIDS are dying in underdeveloped nations because Western countries do not provide life-saving antiretroviral medications. Springer (2006) tells the history of genocide from the eyes of various eras and locales. They reveal how genocide has been going on for a long time. Today, genocide is considered a crime against humanity rather than a desirable thing to be commended. Massacres of whole groups of people are now seen as unethical. Over time, genocide grew more veiled.

According to Springer (2006), people’s sorrow may not be heard for centuries. It meant a country’s authority expanded beyond its borders and people, conquering and ruling new lands. Hochschild utilized Springer 2006 to demonstrate this. Europeans have been killing people in North and South America for a long time. In North America, 95% of indigenous people were slaughtered. There have been many genocides throughout history. There was a genocide of the Aztecs in what is now Mexico, the Arawak/Tainos in the Caribbean, and the Beothuk in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is evidence that British officials gave smallpox-infected blankets and other items to Americans in the past to spread the disease.

Springer says that genocide can only happen after years of planning and preparation by the people who do it or start it. The attackers had a reason for wanting to kill a particular group of people. A government or powerful group might wish for new people to move in and take over land that locals already own. If the land has indigenous people living there, it can help the government, a group, or a business. As a result, a different government or organization may want to keep control of the situation by getting rid of the party or group that is a threat. Genocide may occur anytime and anywhere; therefore, being aware is critical. Most genocides, like the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide, occur during or after the war. Springer’s 2006 book says so. Using force against people who don’t wish to die is called genocide. Smith argues that a civil war can be used to justify not supporting or engaging in a battle amongst citizens of a sovereign country.

In the fight against terrorism, a government may justify killing innocent individuals. Genocide can occur when there is rapid political or societal change. It’s possible that genocide could happen if the country moves from autocracy to democracy because these kinds of situations usually end in a power fight between two groups of people.

During the long process of planning and organizing, the targeted group’s rights steadily erode. They can no longer go to school, marry, or work. They can persuade people to give up their rights by making them appear normal or proper. Arguments, racism, or ethnocentrism cause this. The group is embarrassed and reprimanded in a flash, making them feel uncomfortable and out of place. A bunch of non-humans can be killed without remorse. This theory suggests that. “rats, bugs, and other animals” are used in hate speech. Springer (2006) calls this “savage speech.” He claims that genocide is frequently used. Many people prefer butchering animals to butchering their own. Most of these beliefs dehumanize a group of people to eliminate them. Euphemism replaces harsh words or phrases with mild, vague, or less embarrassing words or phrases. The term “collateral damage” was first used in 1990 and 1991 during the Gulf War. It was neither genocide nor a war. Many genocides have adopted this method.

In addition, the phrase “going to work” was used a lot to describe Tutsi field slaughter. It’s heartbreaking when you have to kill many people or animals. In this case, people who must follow the rules will be more relaxed and at ease if they are well-prepared, motivated, and driven to ensure the slaughter goes off without a hitch. If they are well-prepared, motivated, and pushed to do so in this situation, they will do what they are told to do.

Most genocides could be avoided if perpetrators knew they would be held accountable. Some fear that because genocide offenders have gotten away with it before, they will be able to do it again. Springer (2006) discusses why nations failed to stop genocide for several reasons. Those that accomplished this may appear to be crucial allies or business partners. Maybe not. Second, a country may not be worth worrying about. Because the world is hazardous and merely human, Western authorities refuse to support General Romeo. This was written in 2003. Dallaire wrote about it. It’s crucial to recall how you got rid of something. As a result, preventing genocide entails preserving and passing along the history of the genocide. It’s critical to remember nonviolent genocide survivors and understand why genocide occurred. Also, remember helps survivors and anyone affected by past tragedies come together and heals as a collective.

Most bereaved people wish they could forget what occurred. Many people feel guilty for living while others die. A lot of individuals have to live in terror. It’s challenging to connect with people suffering from anxiety, despair, or withdrawal. This tragedy, which only impacts a few people, has the power to destroy the planet. So tell and recount stories. Many countries now have truth and reconciliation commissions to help those who the past has damaged. Because genocide killed so many people, it’s difficult to recognize a crime was committed, but reparations help those who have been wronged recover by letting them tell their own stories. At reconciliation, the criminals return to their wealthy homes, while the victims return to theirs. This is one of the primary issues that must be resolved before reuniting. Moving forward requires being honest and truthful about what happened. Reconciliation is impossible in a post-genocide society without restitution and an opportunity for victims to go on. There are arms dealers, businesses, and governments in other nations who help or support the people who kill people in that country. They want to keep killing innocent people because they know they can keep doing it.

Genocide criminals should be brought to justice and their crimes made public to prevent future genocides. Building political will takes effort at all levels of society. They must also oppose racism, bigotry, misogyny, and censorship. They can’t disregard crimes, utilize racial stereotypes, or threaten anyone. History is vital to understanding contemporary events and global conflicts. Governments should devote resources to halting genocide. Perhaps it’s time to stop supporting governments that slaughter people. Minority governments should not sit on the sidelines and wait for larger, more powerful governments to act. People can help start the process. Finally, governments may deploy troops into harm’s path to capture and disarm individuals responsible. Often, NGOs and UN agencies are the first to learn of genocide. If there is a risk of genocide, the media should be the first to warn. They must inform the public about the problem and urge them to assist victims.

As soon as Springer ends, people should act like they did when the tsunami hit South Asia in December 2004. Because genocide is such a bad thing, there should be a lot of empathy for the people who died, and this is why. When people see that natural disasters are different from unnatural disasters like genocide, they should not be more willing to help them.