Link Between Agenda Setting and Development of Legislation, Research Paper Example

The link that exists between the setting of an agenda and legislation development is the goings-on joined together by both the setting of the agenda and legislation development. The pathway within which legislation is built up starts with suggestions for projected legislation within the setting of the agenda phase. This extends through official outlining of lawmaking proposals followed by a number of additional steps. The persons and health associated organization and particularly the interest groupings to which they fit in are involved the setting of the agenda, which pave the way for legislation development (Hammond, 2001). Legislation development starts with the adaptation of ideas, anticipations, as well as suppositions with reference to the manner in which predicaments may be addressed via amendments in policy. In this way, the opinions can amalgamate from the setting of the agenda into existing lawmaking proposals or bills.

Agenda setting can be defined as a progression of a convergence of streams provided that activities: problems, probable resolutions, and political situations. The policy comes from the union during a favorable setting. Predicaments alone will not substantiate legislation there should be good solutions. Health policy regulations, statutes, and legislation come about from a policy progression that involves lawmakers, executive branch heads, influential stakeholders, not forgetting the public. The progression is comparable at every administration level, even if the stakeholders’ strength might show a discrepancy to some extent depending on the administration level and the policy. Prior to the policy developing through the lawmaking process, it is required to develop from a stream of a policy through the setting of the agenda (Ubokudom, 2012).

Contemporary health policies, which take the structure of public regulations, for instance, those health policies that are relevant to the protection of the environment, licensure of practitioners and associations that are health-related, exists for the reason that predicaments or concerns came into view. This is for the setting of the agenda, and prompted changes within policy in the structure of transformations within public regulation (Longest, 2009). On the other hand, the mere subsistence of predicaments within these sections was not adequate to activate legislation development meant to address them.

When problems that are related to heath exist, even extremely serious ones, for example, individuals with sufficient health insurance cover or the long-term widespread utilization of tobacco goods, does not consistently front policy establishment meant to work out or revolutionize these predicaments. There also have to be potential solutions to the predicaments, along with the political willpower to endorse specific legislation aimed at resolving or ameliorate the problems (Hammond, 2001). Evidently, the setting of the agenda is fundamental to the nature of the country’s health policies. The setting of the agenda is best comprehended within the context of its most significant variables: problems, potential resolutions, and political situations.

Legislation development is an intricate progression that approaches every interest groupings into alliance so that they can support or trounce proposed legislation. Given that the problem progresses from the setting of the agenda to the process of legislation, no guarantee present to demonstrate that the passing of the legislation will be helpful. Take the example of the 1994 Healthcare protection Act by Clinton. No more than a small number of predicaments from the world of possible problems ever come out from the process of setting the agenda to the lawmaking action. Makers of policy put forward specific lawmaking proposals, which an individual can consider as a potential resolution. The pathway has the aptitude to be an extremely long and meandering road indeed (Longest, 2009).


Hammond, S. W. (2001). Congressional caucuses in national policy making. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Print.

Longest, B. B. (2009). Health policymaking in the United States. Chicago: Health  Administration Press. Print.

Ubokudom, S. E. (2012). United States health care policymaking: Ideological, social and cultural differences and major influences. New York, NY: Springer. Print.