Memory, Essay Example

Arts and neural Science Explanation of Memory

The traditional distinction between humanities and sciences has faced tension from materialist and naturalism view. Conversely, the above convectional dichotomy flops due to lack of neural basis of empathetic involvement in the work of art. Scientists have comprehended how prefrontal modulation of cerebral responses gives more inventive and flexible ways of reflecting on the relationship between experience and automaticity. Recent memory research confounds the separation of experience and history from psychological and corporeal entailments of observing a visual image, and artwork in particular.

According to the concept of ‘The Power of Images,’ mirror neurons have revolutionized the general understanding of bodily responses towards observation and actions of others, both in art or life. The knowledge about mirror neurons has provided information relating to motion, vision, and emotion which form the basis of understanding human responses to art memory. Although mirror neurons do not meet all the require facets of memory, they are essential tools for generating images in body-loop system. Memory has the capacity to shape embodied responses although the body is responsible for shaping memory. In such situations, vision is the key factor that refreshes and restores declarative long-term memory. The poly-modal consequences of sight are responsible to determining the vitality of hand and body which control the work of art. The analysis of such occurrences helps scientists understand art, memory, and neuron mirrors, and other forces that move the body.

Background to Liptak Reports

The uncritical acceptance of information provided by an eyewitness stems for popular misconceptions of the working principles of the memory. Unlike the common believe that human being memory operates like a video recorder, the mind records occurrences and then recounts on them as an exact replica. Conversely, several psychologists have researched on the brain and found out that memory reconstructs rather than playing back every time when prompted to do so. As a result, interrogation by a lawyer may alter the testimony of the witness because bits of memory may unwittingly be combined with data provided by the prosecutor, leading to inaccurate remembrance.

Most jurors emphasize on the testimony of eyewitness when delegating sentence. Psychological researches have shown that reports by witness are sometimes misleading, and, as a result juror should disregard them on the basis of biasness. For instance, jurors give weight to testimonies who reports shows some levels of inaccuracy. In addition, they emphasize on testimonies from eyewitnesses who may appear less confident. As a result, jurors should be educated on the potential uncertainties that may surround eyewitness’ report to ensure the reports are not biased. Additionally, jurors should also adhere to certain regulations of identifying to improve on the accuracy of the eyewitness’ report.

Liptak’s Important Social Contexts for Human Memory

The ability to identify social partners should the power of vision is an integral component for successful interactions in human beings. In court scene facial recognition is important in is identifying suspects which may lead to conviction. Several studies have implied that features in a certain social environment can predict cognitive outcomes of the memory of an eyewitness. High social engagement and networks may reduce the rate of cognitive outcomes which can be attributed to reverse causation. On the socioeconomic basis, elderly people with few social ties, social disengagement, and poor social integration are at higher risk of providing biased eyewitness report. As a result, social relations play an important role in determining the accuracy of information provided by eyewitnesses. Liptak’s report is also relevant to aspects of human behavior since human beings prefer memorizing faces rather other non-face alternatives. Reasonably, the brain has specialized processing sections that are set aside for encoding facial memories. This preference explains why human beings are excellent at memorizing faces than other bodily alternatives. Conversely, human memory may be biased depending on economic conditions and the health conditions of the person. As a result, other evidences should be considered in determining the credibility of eyewitness’ report.