Nepotism in the Field of Business Industries, Essay Example

Revised Quantitative Problem Statement

Nepotism is a growing trend in the business industries. With people aiming to centralize or control the management of the assets of organizations, there are instances when family-related individuals take on the higher positions to be able to mandate the overall function of the organization. This culture among higher ranking officials have become a common trend among organizations around the globe. The question however relies on the idea of making a distinct connection between company success and the existence of nepotism among business leaders.

The study herein shall involve the research on how such operation affect the overall function of the business. Relatively, the connection shall be measured on how modern businesses thrive and how much nepotism affects such function. Relatively, through cross referencing reports and relating such reports to actual results from interviewing company employees and supervisors, the determination of how nepotism impacts business operations shall be better redefined.

Revised Quantitative Purpose Statement

Urbanized areas in highly developed countries serve as home to the largest thriving companies around the globe; some even extending their operations abroad. Comparing their performance with that of the performance of local networks of businesses in other nations, this research shall try to enhance the presentation on how nepotism is creating an impact on how modern businesses are being managed both in the local and the international core of operation. Notably, this concept of business development engaged in a rather negative culture of putting up positions that are to be filled by relatives and other family members of the upper tier of command has become a common ground for social and economic issues in organizations. Resolving them through seeing how they fully affect the organization’s operation is then considered necessary. It is then the purpose of this research to make sure that the data presented in past studies and the current situations in the market are all realigned to give ample interpretation of how nepotism affects business growth.

Quantitative Null Question

Nepotism, being a common weakness among organizational establishments have become a source of social and work commotion on several organizations (Freitang, et al, 2008). Considerably, this concept of putting family members in charge of particular positions in the company have a great impact on how an organization functions. The question is how much such impact affects the overall value of the business and the ways by which the development of the organization is handled according to the primary goals set for the business to follow. The hypothesis to be set to regulate the presentation of the response for this question are as follows: (Null hypothesis)

Nepotism have little to no effect on business operations especially if the organization is originally family-owned in nature.

(Alternative Hypothesis)

Nepotism needs to be controlled in both familial and non-familial setup of business organizations because of the impact they have on the morale of the people both on the upper and lower tier of positions in the business.

Main Hypotheses

Nepotism does have its good and bad effects on business organizations; learning how to manage the operation alongside the existence of nepotism could do businesses some good.

Revised Qualitative Problem Statement

The attitude of the people always count as one of the primary elements that identify well with the process of development that every organization takes into account. For those organizations that are led by individuals who have close familial relations, the attitude of the said individuals towards each other [including familial friction] may affect the overall performance of the organization (Adetula, ,2011). Notably, to make sure of determining how behavioral elements are affected by nepotism in business, research, interview and observation procedures are to be taken into account (Freitang, et al, 2008). This approach shall try to present a determinable evidence that would prove that nepotism does have an impact on organizational performance within an overall scope.

Qualitative Purpose Statement

It is the purpose of this study to bring out definite data that would identify the behavior of the people who are being led under the course of nepotism. It shall try to expose the emotional and behavioral impact that nepotism has on the performance of the leaders and the people they manage as well.

Qualitative research question

If behavior does have a great impact on one’s performance, what does nepotism in the upper tier of management have as an impact on the overall behavior of the people that these managers intend to lead? Are there any complications to consider? Are the positive impacts greater than the negative effects of nepotism in organizations?

These questions shall serve as the guidelines needed to be given attention to as the research is being completed. Seeing through the concept of behavior and attention to performance and attitude among employees led by an administration that follows the culture of nepotism entails to create a distinct presentation of how nepotism actually impacts the overall operation of business organizations especially in handling conflicts that may involve familial issues (Elliot, et al, 2007). Most likely, with this form of examination, the determination of nepotism and its power over the matter of employee performance could be better measured and assured especially as to how such culture manifests changes on the thinking process and the behavioral actuations of the people working in an organization.

References

Freitang, Alan R.; Ashli Quesinberry Stokes; Ashli Quesinberry Stokes (22 December 2008). Global Public Relations: Spanning Borders, Spanning Cultures. Routledge. p. 208.

Adetula, Emmanuel; calibre (0.7.50) (6 April 2011). The Naked Truth. Xlibris Corporation. p. 71.

Salinger, Lawrence M. (2005). Encyclopedia of white-collar & corporate crime, Volume 2 2. pp. 374–375.

Elliot, Jeffrey M. Sheikh R. Ali (1 September 2007). The PresidentialCongressional Political Dictionary. Wildside Press LLC. p. 88.