No Cookie-Cutter Response, Research Paper Example

Executive Summary

The process of supporting healthcare operations in any particular state is a primary concern that local governments ought to give specific attention too. Noticeably, local governments have strongly been trying to adapt considerations that are most capable of creating a difference on how local healthcare operations are supported through local budget resources. Most often than not, the manner by which such conditions are explored makes a definite picture on how modern healthcare systems ought to be given attention to accordingly. Relatively, it is expected that with the emergence of such concern, local governments are trying to create and establish a support system that would be most effective in making a distinct sense of adjustment on how available resources for improved healthcare are used accordingly.

In this discussion, focusing on the Pennsylvanian Primary Healthcare Loan Repayment Program shall be the main reason for this presentation. Bringing the condition of realization on the valuable benefits of the program to both the healthcare system and the students being assisted through the program shall be the primary course of development that this discussion would be based upon. It is assumed that it is through this approach that the creation of value-determination of this specific matter that the condition of appreciation for such type of program would be better understood and supported further by the government and the different agencies that are concerned about the goals of the program itself.

Noticeably, it could be understood that somehow, the emergence of such operation does create a new essence of realization on how available resources are used up to support the healthcare needs of the public being served by the healthcare institutions present in the community. Practically, the creation of such program aims to make a distinctive effect on how the government intends to fulfill its role as the primary provider for the community’s most basic needs which includes healthcare. Being able to seek the most convenient process of utilizing both the human and material resources available for the community, it could be realized how the government is able to consider a definite pattern of development that would equip everyone involved in the process with the right perception and the right ideals directed towards creating a solid connection between elements that strengthens the community as a whole.

The presentation herein aims to show how the definite term of mandating better procedures of supporting healthcare operations directed to mandating public systems that are sure to make a mark on how budget scheduling does affect the overall value of public healthcare especially in Pennsylvania. Most likely, there are instances when such conditions of operations are compromised; how does the Pennsylvania Primary Healthcare Loan Repayment Program support this need accordingly is what is going to be discussed in this documentation.

Need Statement

The need for a program that supports the overall condition of healthcare of a particular community is rather implicative on how healthcare operations are handled accordingly. Every local government has its own financial program that is designed to support the said need; however, it could not be denied that when it comes to creating programs that are most capable of supporting such need by the public, not every community or local government has a perfectly designed system. In Pennsylvania, the program is quite simple and clear. Nevertheless, it could be observed that even such a good program still ought to be improved for the sake of supporting the real need of the people based on the current situations that the community needs to deal with.

Increasing the budget schedule for the program is considered necessary because of three primary points:

• The budget allotted to support the program on sending assigned healthcare practitioners to remote areas is one that increases competency among healthcare facilities as they serve the needs of the local residents of a particular community
• The budget allotted to support the program do not only allow healthcare students to become more extensive in grasping the lessons presented to them in class, but it also gives them the chance to directly apply what they are learning through dealing with actual healthcare cases, including emergencies that they are expected to handle fully and successfully
• The budget allotted for the program gives a chance to existing healthcare facilities effectively especially when it comes to making it easier for the said areas to be fully equipped with the right number of staff and the right skills provided by such human power; thus making them more capable of handling a more distinct process of operation that fits well with the needs of the community.

These points of objectives practically draw the line that directly insists on how modern operations of healthcare systems would best benefit from a solid program that supports the ideal process of utilizing available resources to make sure that the healthcare needs of the community is given particular support. Believably, the capacity of the local governments to handle such condition of responsibility makes it easier for the healthcare facilities to become more effective in defining their role in the society accordingly. The establishment of this need for the program makes a distinct account on why budget scheduling should be further pursued for the conditioning of situations that are basically designed to assist local healthcare facilities to thrive for the needs of the public.

Goals and Objectives

For the sake of improving the condition by which the program affects the overall assumption of development that the system insists, this grant proposal draws its value based on three primary objectives noted as follows:

• To increase the attention given to providing supportive budget for the development of a dependable healthcare program that would be most effective in determining a sense of direction especially in improving the condition of serving the needs of the public through the use of effective program funding
• To increase the interest of local learning healthcare practitioners as they engage in the scholarship learning program that is directed towards making an definite track of operation that is based on the desire to learn more from actual practice
• To develop a more established source of funding through gaining the attention of supporting agencies that could provide as much assistance to the pursuance of the program as it improves the ways by which remote communities are served by available learning healthcare practitioners

These objectives are basically designed to assist the local governments in drawing a more convenient operation that establishes a more extensive pattern of improving a better sense of giving support to the healthcare needs of the community through the use of existing resources. The expansion of such conditions of public service does defend the way the local government takes charge of its most important points of responsibilities; matters that basically draws the condition by which the government does create a massive impact on the lives of the people accordingly; not only on their health but on their professional aspect of living as well.

Methods and Strategies

There are four specific strategies that are to be given attention to in this process of proposal. These steps and strategies are directed towards making a definite impact on how the concept of healthcare improvement is to be given specific conditioning especially in making a distinct effect on how the health of the general public is protected. These strategies include the following:

• Getting the attention of supporting allied organizations and/or institutions that are concerned in the process of improving the healthcare provision concentrated to members of remote areas in the community is an essential part of the strategy to be adapted for the sake of completing this suggestive process of development. This step entails the call for the attention of those who have the right capacity to respond to the situation thus making a definite impact on how the program is pursued and managed for the sake of the stakeholders.
• Getting the attention of prospective students who are willing to give their time, effort as well as sacrifice their comfortable lifestyle for the sake of supporting the needs of the less fortunate members of the community. Noticeably, this approach entails to create a connection between the hopeful medical students [as well as other learners aiming to extend their capacities in the field of healthcare operations] and the areas where they are needed. Such connection is hoped to create a definite indication on how these capable individuals would respond to the need accordingly.
• Connecting the healthcare learners with the prospective institutions needing their skills and expertise [as well as the service they can provide] is assumed to make a definite source of motivation on both parties involved especially in the way they operate for the sake of the community’s betterment. The state of healthcare service provided to the public is particular given value through the existence of such point of cooperation.
• Asking for an extensive support from the government and making adjustments on how the students are to be screened as to their capacity to correspond to the concept of service that they are expected to provide to the public.

These propositions of methodologies are directed towards creating a more extensive process that would enable the program to provide the most effective source of competence that the healthcare organizations need especially in the aim of providing the unfortunate ones with extensive healthcare services that they require. The Pennsylvania Primary Healthcare Repayment Program gives a definite sense of support to the desire of each individual to become more concerned on how it specifically supports the desire of healthcare practitioners to gain extensive expertise while also making a mark on how the needs of the public are responded to accordingly.

These methodologies are directed towards increasing the budget resourcing that the program aims to be dependent upon. It could be analyzed that somehow, these methodologies fully aim to make a definite insistence on how other allied organizations could be used to source out money that would further improve the program’s value for the public and for the healthcare practitioners being helped to master their craft. The idea is simple; the higher the rate of the budget, the larger the scope of the program would be. In this case, the higher rate of budget available to support the cause of the program, the higher the number of available healthcare practitioners who are willing to be assigned in remote areas would be given the chance to empower the current healthcare system that exists in the community at present.

The capacity of the program to support the assumption of better healthcare service for the public is one of the primary reasons as to why this particular arrangement has been made. The role of the program to provide what the public needs in determining the healthcare service quality that the people need from primary healthcare providers and the staff who are being trained to become experts in their own respective fields. Observably, presenting these possibilities of improvement, especially directed towards making a definite course of insistence on how modern operations of development are considered to make a difference on how healthcare operations on remote areas are supported, is expected to make a mark on how adjustments on the program are designed to increase the possible course of health-determination of the public especially in instances when emergencies occur.

Evaluation Section

How are the methodologies related to the overall objective of the proposal? The field of modern healthcare operations is directly dependent on how the government directs its budget and its other available resources in order to support the overall needs of the public. As noted in the previous section, the government is likely able to extend its cooperative operations especially as it makes a definite term of improvement on how it creates alliances that are most effective and important in determining a good sense of utilizing the resources available at its disposal.

Getting the right number of interested staff members who are to accept the offer of the government of assigning them in an area where they are most needed is a solid foundation that strengthens the overall value of the system that supports the Pennsylvania Primary Healthcare Loan Repayment Program. Noticeably, it could be understood that when it comes to establishing a good source of competent improvement, getting the attention of the right people with the right motivation helps well in establishing the way the goals of the program ought to be reached accordingly.

To be able to get the interest of the right staff members to make up the overall operating human resources of remote healthcare facilities, it is evidently important to get the right source of help from highly motivated institutions and organizations that are ready to support the needs of the public in terms of strengthening public health developments. Most often than not, increasing the budget source for such program shall increase the trust of the participants to be assured that they are to be well supported with the course of improvement they want to embrace while fully determining the professional advancements they would like to gain.

Sustaining such systems of operation would fully equip program operators with the proper way of improving services that are directed towards providing the public with extensive and high quality healthcare support that they need. The more support the participants get, the more motivated they become in completing their tasks for the public. All in all, the proposal of budget increase through getting more sponsors to be involved in the cause that the program is based upon is expected to make a relative mark on how the Pennsylvanian healthcare system would take a definite form of refurnishing its systems to strengthen public healthcare services.

Other Funding or Sustainability   

How could the funding system be sustained to support the needs of the remote healthcare facilities and the people who are staffed in to perform for the sake of public health improvement and care? Getting the approval of expected allied partners into the system is only the first part of the strategy. Getting them involved in the overall cause of the process is what makes the alliance more solid and valuable for the sake of supporting public healthcare needs. This approach aims to sustain the partnership, allowing both parties to become more effective in supporting each other’ s values, thus improving public healthcare quality.

How does their involvement get solidified? Establishing monthly or at least quarterly programs that would help these organizations and/or institutions to make the public know about their involvement in the program would help well in increasing their interest in joining the process of supporting the Pennsylvanian Primary Healthcare Loan Repayment Program. Giving them the chance to be recognized by the public is one particular come-on that most organizations look for in the conditions that they are to sign-up for.

Making sure that they are able to get such attention from the public is good; but not sufficient enough to make them stay into the program and get their constant support in its pursuance. Instead, making them realize their role as the supporters of public health is what makes such partnership more solid and valid. Preferably, making them feel that they are part of the progress that the community undergoes especially in attaining better healthcare status would give them a more visualized idea on what they are able to do because of the help that they are extending for the program. Giving them updates on the current developments in the healthcare status of the population living in remote areas as well as with regards the improvement that the practicing healthcare staff members acquire because of the program would help well in making them realize how much value they are adding up to the healthcare industry through the support they are implying for the program.

True, the program in itself has its distinct value. Noticeably, many individuals have already been benefiting from the program, especially as they take on the chance of gaining an improved sense of learning through embracing the possibility of being assigned in remote areas and being given particular medical cases that could improve the way they handle actual medical situations thus increasing their competence in service. Through the years of the program’s being established in the phase of public application, it could be analyzed the working towards the betterment of the public and the improvement of the work-competence of the staff members is what makes the program more conducive and attractive. Nevertheless, its being fully effective in meeting its goal of providing better healthcare resource for members of remote areas still need to be improved. More individuals are needed to willingly support the process of bringing better healthcare services to more remote areas.

Getting their attention could only be possible if the budget supporting the program’s pursuance is given particular attention to. Getting the government to solely support such needs through public funding and tax resources may not be fully efficient in making sure that such operations would be much helpful in fully redefining the way the program supports the need of the public. Hence, to make sure that the strategy is solid, involving private entities [and even the public] would best make the approach more steady and sustainable through time. What does it mean to involve public entities into the situation? Raising public campaigns that are designed to improve the way the people understand the situation and the condition of healthcare proposals that are being pursued to support the needs of the less fortunate is what makes the approach more solid. Considering the way healthcare operations occur is what makes the condition of development more solid and more effective, especially in maintaining a better course of improvement on how the needs of the less fortunate members of the society are supported. With solid public support, it is expected that private institutions would gain more interest in joining the campaign and providing the needed budget that is suffice enough to support the program’s overall value for healthcare reformation in remote areas.

Organizational Information

People empowerment; this is the primary goal of the Pennsylvania Primary Healthcare Repayment Program. With the way people are empowered to work well towards their stakeholders would affect the overall condition of healthcare operations that a particular community is dependent upon. This idealism leads the local government of Pennsylvania to pursue such program and provide insistent support to the ways by which the cooperation among different sectors of the community would be formed and solidified for the sake of insisting on how modern ways of healthcare operations would be best able to make a stand on how modern ways of living is supported even in remote areas.

Empowering the people means getting their interest and making sure that their interest comes from a solid form of motivation; making them stay much longer in the program with full understanding of the need to be willingly adjusted into the life that they are supposed to face as they engage in remote healthcare operations. While money is one of the most important resources to support such goal, personal motivation is just as important. Hence, in pursuing the solidity of this particular program, it is rather important to take note of the need to establish personal and professional motivation as a mere insistence on how good impression on healthcare operations is to be given attention to. Helping the target participants to see the real value of the program for them and for the completion of their goals for the public shall help these individuals become more committed into the system, thus making it easier for them to benefit more from what they are doing and whatever it is there for them to take into account once they are faced with distinct emergency cases in actual practice as they are assigned in remote areas.           

Final Remarks

Making the approach more solid is what this documentation is all about. Structuring the program to be based on cooperation between the different sectors of the society that are dedicated towards making a change in the healthcare system provided to the less fortunate members of the remote areas in the community is what makes the program more implicative especially in the way it is founded upon the desire of empowering the society to function more fully with good healthcare support system. The overall function of the program in supporting healthcare practitioners as they tend to master their degrees is founded upon the creation of a more effective system of healthcare operation that is teamed up with distinct courses of development that are aided through the help of effective and actual medical cases distinctively designed to help them improve the way they function for their target stakeholders.

Getting them out of their classrooms and into the field is what makes this program solid especially in producing more dependable individuals who are equipped to face definite pressures in the field of medicine while they serve the needs of the population in remote areas. Teaching them to be more flexible to the needs of their stakeholders, these healthcare professionals are expected to offer more to the public in the coming years as they finish their studies and are given the chance to make the decision of helping out the needs of the less fortunate members of the society. Through funding their desires and their dreams, the Pennsylvanian Primary Healthcare Loan Repayment Program is sure to make a difference on how healthcare is shaped among the minds of these young professionals and how public service is retained as part of their professional growth and development.

Conclusion

What makes the program rewarding is the fact that every individual who would undergo practice-training under its covered provisions would be well supported by the government and other allied organizations who are willing to make adjustments for the sake of such pursuance of support. Most likely, the budget being prepared to make a mark on such program is designed to mandate a sense of complete reaction on how the beneficial values of the program would be fully grasped by the participants [the medical practitioners] and their stakeholders [the public-expecting to be served with their immediate and long term healthcare needs]. Most often than not, individuals who take on such challenges are serious enough about the course of professional growth they hope to embrace.

In short, they already have the base motivation. What must be done is to make the source of motivation strong enough to make it easier for them to stay within the course of improvement they are willing to take. Most likely, staying within such motivation could be helped through allowing themselves be immersed into the beneficial value of being under a program, financial supported by institutions that recognize their course of existence, making a mark on how they are able to complete their tasks for the betterment of the public’s healthcare status development.

In this proposal, the process of gaining ample budget for the course of development that the program aims to embrace is based on the idea of gaining social cooperation in the works to make sure that operations of the program become more effective especially in aiding modern healthcare practitioners who are still undergoing their studies and the process of improving their skills in their own fields of expertise. Making such cooperative distinction work for the sake of improving public healthcare operations is considered valuable especially in aiding the less fortunate with the support that they need in order to function fully with good healthcare support that they require for survival. Most likely, the capacity of the program to give the proper support that the society needs and the healthcare experts require creates a more solid form of healthcare operation that the community needs in order for all its subjects [members] to function fully to aid overall social courses of development.

Works Cited

Thomas-MacLean R et al. No Cookie-Cutter Response: Conceptualizing Primary Health Care.http://www.uwo.ca/fammed/csfm/tutor-phc/documentation/trainingpapers/TUTOR_Definitio_%20of_primar_%20health_care.pdf. (Retrieved on March 22, 2015).

St Sauver JL, Warner DO, Yawn BP et al. (January 2013). “Why patients visit their doctors: assessing the most prevalent conditions in a defined American population“. Mayo Clin. Proc. 88 (1): 56–67.

Simmons J. Primary Care Needs New Innovations to Meet Growing Demands. HealthLeaders Media.

Christensen, L.R.; E. Grönvall (2011). “Challenges and Opportunities for Collaborative Technologies for Home Care Work”. S. Bødker, N. O. Bouvin, W. Lutters ,V. Wulf and L. Ciolfi (eds.) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24–28 September 2011, Aarhus, Denmark (Springer): 61–80

Bond J. & Bond S. (1994). Sociology and Health Care. Churchill Livingstone.

Cambria, Erik; Tim Benson, Chris Eckl and Amir Hussain (2012). “Sentic PROMs: Application of Sentic Computing to the Development of a Novel Unified Framework for Measuring Health-Care Quality“. Expert Systems with Applications, Elsevier.

Tulenko et al., “Framework and measurement issues for monitoring entry into the health workforce.” Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2012.

Vögele, Claus (2013). “On Living a Long, Healthy, and Happy Life, Full of Love, and with no Regrets, until Our Last Breath”. Verhaltenstherapie 23:287–289.

Nutter S. (2003) The Health Triangle. Anchor Points, Inc.

Callahan D. (1973). “The WHO definition of ‘health'”. The Hastings Center Studies 1 (3): 77–87.

Moffett, Tamara. “Top Ten Reasons for Poor Health.” Livestrong. 16 Aug. 2014.