Organization Change Management, Essay Example

Introduction

It is crucial for a company to achieve successful management of change for its survival in the competitive and changing business environment. There are various theories and approaches that are contradictory to researchers change management. These approaches are supported by unchallenged hypothesis concerning the nature of the business while others do not have empirical evidence

There are four fundamental principles that should be used in change management for a business or company to move in the right direction. These principles are planning, controlling, influence and organizing. Good managers ensure they prioritize these principles and give them the same weight. The four principles should run concurrently for production of the required results in any business. When one of the principles is ignored or under used the business is doomed to produce poor results.

Planning

This principle helps in the determination of the organization goals and objectives of a company that is in change management process. Appropriate management of change should consider proper planning because it helps in coming up with reasonable and realistic goals that are achievable as the business is undergoing change. Planning helps employees to set tasks that should be conducted in the organization for the achievement of the desired goals. The planning process helps the employees to differentiate when the task should be performed and how it should be performed. When there is planning in organizations employees, are coordinated hence they work together for the achievement of the same objective (Wilkinson, Malcolm and Gollan 4). When the managers come up with an efficient plan, the employees are influenced to work for the success of the organization. Planning should be done first because it is considered a foundation of the organization in change management. Managers are able to state the objectives of the organization when an appropriate plan is put in place. Managers use different methods for sustainability to achieve the stated objectives, and this demonstrates skillful management of the employees. Employees are able to put the plan into action without difficulties and when problems appear, they usually have a solution. Planning has assisted managers to make rational decisions in connection to their work thus ensures appropriate management of employees. The employees should be involved in the planning process to deliver the right results, which ensures proper management of change and sustainability.

Organizing

Through organization, the employees are given the tasks and assignments they should perform to ensure there is sustainability. The organizing process is cogent because it ensures proper management since the employees are able to complete their assignments on time. Proper organization assists employee to perform their work satisfactorily thus it is a sign of quality management. For a company to manage their employees well, it should incorporate the organization process in their management (Smith and Rayment 60). This ensures that employees use the resources of the company well without misusing them. Organization has instilled the spirit of teamwork in the employees hence they are able to perform their tasks within a short time. The process of organization has helped in quality management of employees as it reminds them on the objectives of the company. This reflection keeps the objectives fresh in mind thus directing the employees through out their work. Employees are able to pinpoint the key tasks, which should be tacked first and be given the appropriate considerations. Good management of employees can be emphasized through the process of organization because it helps them to divide the tasks in small bits for easy accomplishment. The employees are able to allocate resources without difficulties because they are organized.

Controlling

Good management of employees ensures that they are controlled because this makes things happen according to plan. When employees are controlled they rarely move out of the goals and objectives, but they work on them. The process of controlling is salient because it helps to measure whether the performance of the employees. There is satisfactory management when employees are controlled because there is easy monitoring of the company’s progress (Margaret 369). This process helps in the collection of the right information to be used by employees. Controlling helps in measuring the employee’s performance in accordance to some stipulated standards that should be met. This helps to bring the employees back to track when they are not performing well thus proper management. When the actions of employees are controlled it helps in easy control of the other variables in the company. The control process ensures that employees do the task they have been assigned at the correct time. When the process of control is ignored, the employees may do the things against a standard set of principles. The process of control is continuous, and this helps managers to detect any problem at every stage.

Influencing

Influencing is sagacious because it helps in guiding and directing the employees to company’s objectives. The managers should influence the employees by motivating them in their work. Influencing helps in proper management of employees because it ensures that they perfume their tasks satisfactorily. Managers can influence employees by offering them reward doing a marvelous job (Harris and Crane 220). Influencing helps in quality management of employees because they are able to set goals and objective which are attainable. Managers can influence the employees by setting a convenient communication channel. This is because communication helps employees to understand what is required of them. Employees are able to get the correct information through communication thus perform their. Good management of employees ensures the sharing of information by managers. When employees contribute to ideas in a certain task, they are influenced to work on these ideas so that they do not fail. Managers should not only share information by employees, but they should provide forums for feed back to the employees.

The evaluation of an organization helps those in management to realize the short term and long-term goals at the right time. This helps the managers to detect whether the organization is moving in the right direction and if not, they are able to come up with solutions before it is too late (Griffiths & Petrick, Pp 1576). The evaluation of an organization is considered important because it helps the managers know whether the goals, target and objectives that were originally designed are met. This is because organizations can loose track of their goals and divert to other objectives, hence making the mission of the organization to be irrelevant.

Through evaluation, the company is able to come up with strategies for dealing with the changing environment. Because technology is rising at a fast rate, it is important for organizations to come up with methodologies for incorporating beneficial technology into their system (Daily and Huang 1540). This will help an organization make adjustments in areas that need improvement. Evaluation helps in monitoring and checking the operations of an organization. This helps to identify whether a company is getting the fullest outcome from its input. This will assist a company change the strategies for delivering more results to the clients (Jones and Kramar 255).

For a company to conduct good evaluation, it should consider the employees as their priority. Employees are the most significant body in an organization hence the company should be very careful not to lower the morale of the workers when they are conducting their evaluations. This can be achieved through involving them in decision making of the companies goals because realistic goals will be addressed. In the evaluation process, the company should reward the employees who do a good job. This will help boost their morale hence working aggressively to achieve the goals of he company. An efficient evaluation process should not only consider the company’s well being, but it should also consider the well-being of employees. The salaries and wages should be reasonable, this will avoid oppressing and under paying the employees. The company’s evaluation should show the employees that they care for them. This can be through the company’s effort to educate potential employees on their talents and capabilities. This will ensure that the skills of the employees are improved hence working to produce quality services to the clients.

Companies should not dwell on strength, weakness, opportunity, threat, (SWOT) evaluation. This is because an organization may concentrate too much on its strengths and forget about the weaknesses. SWOT is a good tool for reflecting how the company is performing but it is not a competitive advantage. This is because SWOT emphasizes only on the advantages and positive sides of a company (Aras and Crowther 3).

 Works Cited

Aras Guler & Crowther David. Governance and sustainability. New York: emerald group publishing limited. Vol 46 No. 3, 2008.

Daily Bonnie & Huang Su-chun. Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. New York: MCB university Press. Vol. 21, 2001, Pp. 1539-1552, 2005.

Griffiths Andrew & Petrick Joseph. Corporate architectures for sustainability. New York: MCB university press. International journal of operations & production management, Vol. 21 No 12, 2001, Pp. 1573-1585

Harris Lloyd & Crane Andrew. The greening of organizational culture. London: MCB UPLimited. Journal of organizational change management, Vol.15 No.3, 2002, Pp. 214-234.

Jones Grant & Kramar Robin. CSR and the building of leadership capability. Sydney: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Journal of global responsibility. Vol.1 No. 2 2010 Pp. 250-259.

Margaret, Queen. Organizational change management: A critical review. London: Taylor & Francis. Journal of change management Vol. 5, No. 4, 369-380 2005.

Sustainability, governance & organizational change. New York: Greenleaf publishing. 2003

Smith Jonathan & Rayment John. Globally fit leadership: four steps forward. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Journal of global responsibility. Vol.1 No.1 2010 Pp. 55-65.

Wilkinson Adrian, Malcolm Hill & Gollan Paul. The sustainability debate. London: MCB university press. International journal of operations & production management, Vol. 21 No 12, 2001 Pp. 1492-1502.

Waddell & Cummings. Organizational change development of transformation. South Meibame: Cengage learning.2011.