Pulling Up the Runaway, Essay Example

General Purpose

To give better information about the general view on what doctor-assisted suicide is about

Specific Purpose

To convince readers that doctor assisted suicide is not as bad as it is viewed by some and that it should be legalized for the sake of the patient’s ease

Introduction

Would you opt to see your loved one who is sick having the hardest time dealing with an ailment experience deadening pain because of the medical struggles they have to handle? For those who cannot handle the said scenario, they are usually opting to just let go of their loved ones instead of seeing them suffer from such an ailment. One specific option provided through medical assistance is mercy killing.

Reason to Listen

Doctor assisted suicide is also noted as euthanasia. The way a person has to deal with particular medical problems is one matter that is most often than not a hard situation that people usually accept gradually. However, there are instances when the medical situations become harder to contend with because of the point of hardship that the patient experiences from such ailment. Noticeably, it could be assumed that somehow, the emergence of such condition of operation does not only create a definite form of ethical issue among the individuals affected by the situation especially among the members of the family affected by the situation (Cohen, et al, 1994, 89).

Thesis Statement

Medical situations are almost impossible to contend with especially when it comes to measuring the capacity of individuals to become more effective in handling issues that involve point of survival based on dealing with issues of life and death.

General Information

The ethical considerations over such option of easing out someone’s pain have a definite impact on how dealing with patients facing terminal situations with their health ought to be given attention to. Noticeably, there are instances when such options become necessary. Doctors know the span of time when a patient’s terminal case ought to be given way, and somehow, there are instances when they give the last word encouraging the family-members to give what the patients need and what the patients require just so to take on a definite sense of what they hope to have to live the last days of their lives with happiness and satisfaction.

Death is an unavoidable ending of life; nevertheless, the right of every human being to live makes death a rather unwanted matter [which of course is normal]. In the field of medicine, life is an important matter that ought to be saved. Most likely, it is considered that this is the reason why many operations and distinct medical applications are given attention to and developed to support the growing medical needs of the community (Asch, et al, 1997, 890). Necessarily, these innovations are given way to imply a much stronger foundation that needs to be assessed especially for the sake of improving healthcare operations dedicated to the people. In short, medical applications are developed to maintain a definite sense of concentration on how life and living could be improved according to the healthcare needs of the people being attended to.

Transition

Hence, killing or imposing death on a person is an exact opposite to the course of role or goal that medical applications are basically established for. Nevertheless, the birth of mercy killing, euthanasia or doctor-assisted death is one that has been defined to develop a much better sense of what life-quality is about (Seale, 2005, 205). Healthcare industries are developed to make a definite sense of what is assumed as proper health support as needed by the public. The agencies and institutions included in the industry are basically designed to incur a better implication on how to develop better options for humans to enjoy a better quality of life.

When a person is suffering from an ailment, the pressure to live a satisfying life is usually set aside. The hope of curing the sick comes first. Nevertheless, it could be understood that there are instances when terminal cases of particular ailments push individuals to be supported by medical operations, medications or machines that makes it possible for them to live. In short, they might not be able to continue to live alongside these intervening aspects of medical considerations. This is where the consideration for quality-life comes into focus. Would living under the conditional support of medical operations and machines lead to a satisfying and quality life? If not, could it still be called a good life; the one that healthcare industries have been made for in the first place? Would it not be more logical to agree that when a case is terminal and that a person suffering from an ailment is only living because of the support of artificial interventions making life rather harder to contend with on their part, it would be much more reasonable to terminate such existence?

Conclusion

Family members whose loved ones are suffering from grueling pain because of an ailment of course feel sorry for the situation; it would not be impossible for them to seek for a more convenient process to ease the patient from the pain and the agony that medication brings about. This is what family development is about (Groenewould, et al, 2005, 551) . Pain is a definite part of medication, especially when it comes to dealing with terminal health cases. Doctor-assisted death is often considered as the most practical option that patients experiencing such pain and relentless pressure [leading to death itself] be allowed to legally undertake the option of giving way to their lives through induced medical procedures. So to speak, quality life is what medical practitioners hope to give their patients with; when they know that their patients already do not have any chance of receiving such satisfaction from life because of a terminal case and that there is nothing more that can be done, would it not be reasonable for individual patients to decide on whether or not they are to continue the medication even though it may mean ending their own lives?

Works Cited

Mayo DJ, Gunderson M (2002). “Vitalism revitalized…. Vulnerable populations, prejudice, and physician-assisted death”.Hastings Cent Rep 32 (4): 14–21.

Ryan CJ (Oct 1998). “Pulling up the runaway: the effect of new evidence on euthanasia’s slippery slope”. J Med Ethics 24 (5): 341–4.

Adams M, Nys H (2003). “Comparative reflections on the Belgian Euthanasia Act 2002“. Med Law Rev 11 (3): 353–76.

Kluge, Eike-Henner W. (2000). “Assisted Suicide, Ethics and the Law: The Implication of Autonomy and Respect for Persons, Equality and Justice, and Beneficence“. In Prado, C.G. Assisted Suicide: Canadian Perspectives. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press. p. 83.

Wolfslast, Gabriele (2008). “”Physician-Assisted Suicide and the German Criminal Law.””. In Birnbacher, Dieter; Dahl, Edgar. Giving Death a Helping Hand: Physician Assisted Suicide and Public Policy. An international Perspective. Germany: Springer. p. 88.

Groenewoud JH, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Willems DL, van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G (2000). “Clinical Problems with the Performance of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands”. New England Journal of Medicine 342 (8): 551–6.

Ganzini L, Goy ER, Dobscha SK (2008). “Prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients requesting physicians’ aid in dying: cross sectional survey“. BMJ 337: a1682.

Rietjens J, van Delden J, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Buiting H, van der Maas P, van der Heide A (2008). “Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study“. BMJ 336 (7648): 810–3.

Cohen, Jonathan S.; Fihn, Stephan D.; Boyko, Edward J.; Jonsen, Albert R.; Wood, Robert W. (14 July 1994). “Attitudes toward Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia among Physicians in Washington State”. New England Journal of Medicine 331 (2): 89–94.

Seale C (April 2009). “Legalisation of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: survey of doctors’ attitudes”. Palliat Med 23 (3): 205–12.

Hayden LA (1999). “Helping Patients with End-Of-Life Decisions”. The American Journal of Nursing 99 (4): 24BB–24EE.

Asch DA, DeKay ML (September 1997). “Euthanasia among US critical care nurses. Practices, attitudes, and social and professional correlates“. Med Care 35 (9): 890–900.