Sartrean Existentialism Theory, Essay Example

According to Jean Satre, there is the creation of some things to concede with the templates for themselves. In other words, he refers to this scenario as that which essences precedes existence to mean the role of these things is determined before they exist. For Example, a blueprint of the house comes before the house itself. However, some things are made before their essence; for these things, he describes them as having existence preceding essence. The main focus for this reasoning Satre uses Human beings whereby he says that we are born before we get to choose the importance of our lives, that is every man makes himself, every man is accountable for his vitality for his role in the world, and finally, every man is a plan aware of itself.

Satre Existentialism theory applies decision-making methods by making decisions on full awareness of one’s freedom and responsibility. Sacre uses these steps to encourage the reflection of one’s project and one’s situation and the possibility of refusing to accept other people’s expectations. Under this theory, six steps of the decision-making process are used; that is, the First step involves defining the problem, which is not very involving. The subsequent step, the second step is identifying available solutions to the problem. The third step is involving the evaluation of the different alternatives to the solution. The fourth step consists of deciding on the kind of solution you have chosen for the problem. The fifth step involves implementing the decision selected in step four above, and finally, step six necessitates the evaluation of the decision chosen. An example involves looking for a solution to the competition problem in the oil companies within the same country.

Satre Existentialism theory classifies our actions as unethical based on several discussions regarding Satre’s philosophy on Existentialism. The basis of these factors on his understanding of a person’s general life and the reasons we are condemned to freedom as humanity. He discusses his explanations based on the following three elements, Anguish, Forlornness, and Despair, as described by Satre.

Anguish is described as the feelings of total and profound responsibility for the choices that we make. Under this element, Satre indicates that a person should always question the ability to make the right decisions. This description considers the actions of believing in the actions as being suitable to be unethical. This is proven by considering human beings as people who lack control in deciding whether their decisions are right or wrong.

Forlornness is another element that Satre uses to support his discussions by which he refers to this condition as being that God is non-existent and also that we ought to face all the repercussions of this. Under this scenario, he says that we have no rules and guidelines for our actions. Based on this discussion, we can see that my decision of believing that God exists and the holy bible provides the guidelines for a person’s life is considered unethical. Moreover, it creates an ethical dilemma by showing that we do not have any rules and guidelines for our actions while at the same time we need those rules to guide us in our efforts.

Finally, he uses despair as the last element, whereby he describes it as the absence of hope for a more accessible future. He sees that we cannot extend the ramifications to our actions because we don’t know what will happen in the future, thus causing despair. He also indicates that our steps are short-lived and understand that our actions cannot appreciably impact the world. From all the above,  he uses despair to demoralize our efforts and making my actions on believing in a better future to being unethical. Furthermore, he contributes to the ethical dilemma by saying that we cannot fix the issues affecting us to any appreciable degree. At the same time, the main goal he brings is the ability to fix the problems that we are facing through our actions.