Home / Research Paper / Scotfish New Performance Appraisal, Research Paper Example

Scotfish New Performance Appraisal, Research Paper Example

Pages: 8

Words: 2185

Background

This report aims to provide a practical appraisal methodology for Scotfish that will yield superior contentment and a greater motivational level on its workers, improving productivity for scotfish and workers motivation. The unique aspect of the performance appraisal system that aids in improving motivation entails the connection of performance appraisal and reward, using a performance appraisal system in helping set aims and objectives and standards, and using the performance appraisal in helping identify workers’ strengths their weaknesses.

This report discusses and proposes a new performance appraisal system at Scotfish Limited since it is evident that Scotfish presently does not have a consistent and reliable performance appraisal system. As a result, I seek to inform and reassure Scotfish that this is a common concern for many manufacturers attempting to improve the quality and quantity of manufacturing, improving staff development, and improving the overall employee culture. There is a considerable amount of expertise and examples I can use to assess, analyze, and recommend solutions for Scotfish Limited. In the following report, a framework for assessment, analysis, and recommendations is made using industry expertise and several specific case examples where performance appraisal systems have been implemented successfully.

Aims and objectives

This policy aims to provide Scotfish with a relevant, concise, and reliable structure for the appraisal of worker’s performance within the context of work enhancement, self-appraisal, and developmental planning. It guarantees that executives justifiably and honestly appraise the performance of their workers and guarantee that every worker is delivering superior quality services and that workers are treated with esteem and self-respect. It also provides line managers with an efficient tool for apprising their worker’s job performances and as well aid workers in improving their job performance, it as provides workers with a chance of getting respond concern.

From the information analyzed about scotfish, I will deliver a report of the revised approach to performance appraisal and any other recommendations that will be provided to scotfish on how best to manage the identifications of learning and developments need of salaried personnel and any other specific training needs for line managers with regards to performance management. It is simple to perceive engagement as management from workers’ perception, specifically if it demonstrates the appropriate dedication. Some feel that worker’s engagements turn out to be less of significance in a slump when in reality, it might be the factor that permits a business in problem to survive (Evans, 2004, p. 93).

As a result, this report will provide a better approach to performance appraisal in specific and is aimed at any other extra recommendation on how to manage the recognition of learning as well as developmental requirements of salaried staff for scotfish limited and any other relevant training for line managers with regards to performance management.

Problem Analysis

Performance Appraisal and Employees Reward

Worker’s motivation depicts great relevance in an institutional setting, and it is significance mainly depends on its ability to initiate individual attitude, direct that attitude, and sustain. From this setting, the performance appraisal might motivate workers by way of rewarding information of job promotions and salary increments. According to Herzberg’s theorem, these rewards are extrinsic rewards that might be used to enhance performances.

Performance Appraisal for Incentive through Job Promotion

According to the performance appraisal process, the appraisers evaluate the worker’s performance and offer a performance number. This number further leads to the creation of a level performance number, which the organization will use as a basis of determining rewards as part of the incentives process; any time there are latest job opportunities beyond the entry levels, the performance number turns to be an essential point of references for the managers to use for internal job promotions. Such job promotion not merely acts as an incentive for the worker’s past performances but also performs an essential function of sending a clear message to the fellow workers that their prospect’s hard work will pay off. As a result, other works in the institution are encouraged to enhance their job performances.

Salary Increment and Bonus Payment

Within the performance management literature, the leading perception is that cash or pat-off performances are the leading and efficient approach forwarding workers and thus improve motivation. Cash as a result act as an extrinsic motivator by fulfilling works needs by way of bonus and pay. While justifying the basis for pay for performances drawing on the reinforcement’s theorem, which recommends that the pay might be connected to performances by setting a unique target. Workers are thus rewarded based on their capacity to attain these targets.

The intrinsic motivation of earning more, as a result, impacts workers to put extra effort into their work and improve their performance as well. Performance evaluation thus performs an essential role in establishing the number of bonus payments of salary increments. In working out the bonus pay, the sales and human resource team might set anticipated performance levels of workers like goods sold. Workers who surpass the set levels will get bonus pay.

Performance Appraisal and Employees Appreciation

Performance appraisal has also been seen as an essential function in workers’ motivation by facilitating an avenue for appreciating worked attainments. Recognition in this context comprises individual non-income rewards that support reinforcements of a needed attitude seen from employees. It entails providing compliments, rewards like a certificate of achievements, private finance. Managers and line supervisors must appreciate the efforts of their workers since attitude might trigger inventions and application of attitude that lead to improved performances. Furthermore, appreciation has been seen to motivate the applications of creative problem-solving skills amongst workers.

Using Performance Appraisal to give Supervisory Support

Performance appraisal is deemed a motivational tool as a result of its capacity of helping in identifying worker’s strengths and aids in capitalizing on them through supports. Also, weakness is identified, and appreciate measures taken by supervisory support that is appropriate in aiding the workers to improve. After an evaluation process, workers who get support show that this kind of support contributes substantially towards creating and generating ideas. The capability of motivating worker’s performance appraisal mainly relies on how the outcome of the process is employed. For example, where the outcome is employed to punish mistakes, innovating attitude is mainly demotivated.

Performance appraisal outcomes that deem as a learning opportunity have, on the other hand, been found to motivate invention amongst workers, and most of the time, workers are susceptible to deviating from their daily or routine attitude to unusual attitude and implementing inventive ideas if they thin their line managers will not punish them.

Analysis Section

Method of analysis

Once this information is gathered, I will then draft the best performance management appraisal for scotfish limited. The following will be my ideal strategy for analyzing the collected information. I will use the primary job assessment approach such as the critical incident technique like the interviews, job assessment, reviews of documented job descriptions, observations, self-report journals, sampling of activities, and questionnaires. The management position descriptions questionnaires will also be the most straightforward approach of using a detailed questionnaire in defining managerial performances (Rausch, 2015, p. 88). Based on responses gathered from executives, the outcome will lead to the identification of the following essential job factor.

Provision of personnel services in non-operational areas. Rendering many personnel services to line managers collecting data, undertaking interviews, choosing workers, giving them some brief, checking reports, approving facts, and making some recommendations.
Supervisions of jobs. Planning, organizing, and controlling the job of other workers, concerns with the effective use of resources, the environments of subordinates, effective inventory management, and maintenance of the labor force.
Business controls; concerning the cost control, maintenance of correct inventory records, budget preparations, validation of capital expenditure, determine the objective, defining the duties of the line managers, paying employees’ salaries on time, enforcing policies.
Technical concern with product and market penetration. Concerning developing the latest business model, competitor’s activities, client contacts, supporting the sales representatives.
Human, society, as well as societal affairs. Concerning the firm’s benevolence in the society, engagement in corporate social responsibilities.
Wide range plan. Broader concern on the prospect does not get engaged in routines and tends to be free of direct control.
Practice of more expansive power and authority. Making recommendations on the vital matter, keeping updated concerning the firm’s performance, interpreting policies with high standings.
Business reputations. Concerning product standards and public relations.
Individual needs. Sensing commitments of conduct personal self as per the stereotypes of the conventional business leader.

An assessment of the above factors recommends comparatively little focus on product standards. Most factors have been handled in developing an internal service and control for effectiveness and developing an external image in promoting the suitability of the organizations in society. The job that describes managerial duties has focused on attitude, aptitude, or characteristics in entirety (Rothwell, 2013, p. 107. The recommendation is that appraisal of effectual managerial performance regarding specific attitude is especially hard since many of the attitude linked to triumphant job performance are not proportionally noticeable and depicts an association of skills and attributes.

The attributes are broadly employed across institutions and are approved by managers since they have experience cogency. Nonetheless, they are comparatively less attractive to appraise professionals because they are precisely subtle to the traits of unique duties, and they are hard to be seen, appraise and validate. In Many settings, results have been validated as legal measures (Schneier et al., 2015, p. 93). Nonetheless, as an appraisal of personal performance, they are uncertain since situations most certainly impact them not under the control of the managers.

Timetable of activities

The following activities will be undertaken together with their completion time.

Setting the plan (Quarterly)

Defining the objectives
Setting control point
Choosing timelines

Monitoring (semiannually)

Checking the progress
Reassessing the objectives
Offering response

Reviewing (yearly)

Collecting the outcomes
Awarding the rating
Discussing the results

The graph of the timelines

The objectives approach’s performance by objectives approach is employed to correlate the all-embracing institutional objectives with workers’ goals effectively while approving goals using the “SMART” approach to observe whether the goals are significantly measurable, attainable, realistic, and time conscious. At the end of the reviewing stage, workers are appraised by their outcome (Varona, 2017, p. 112). Success is awarded job promotions and salary increments, while failures are handled with shift or further job training. This procedure typically emphasizes palpable objectives and non-palpable aspects such as interpersonal skill, dedications, etc., which the managers often disregard.

References

Arthur, D., & American Management Association. (2008). Performance appraisals. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.

Ashdown, L. (2018). Performance Management: A Practical Introduction. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.

Bhattacharyya, D. K. (2011). Performance Management Systems and Strategies: India: Pearson Education India.

Biech, E. (2018). ATD’s action guide to talent development: A practical approach to building your organization’s TD effort. American Society for Training and Development.

Blazey, M. L., & Grizzell, P. L. (2021). Insights to performance excellence 2021-2022: Using the Baldrige framework and other integrated management systems. Quality Press.

Brenner, L. (2015). Driving Career Results: How to Manage Self-Directed Employee Development. Pearson Education.

Brown, B. (2018). Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts. United States: Random House Publishing Group.

Busch, V. (2019). Performance Management in Small Manufacturing Companies. Changes and Future Trends. Dissertation. Germany: GRIN Verlag. Accessed June 7, 2021, from www.google.com/books/edition/Performance_Management_in_Small_Manufact

Cleveland, J., Zedeck, S. (2017). Performance Measurement and Theory. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.

Colquitt, A. L. (2017). Next-generation performance management: The triumph of science over myth and superstition. Iap- Information Age Publishing.

Daley, D. M. (1992). Performance appraisal in the public sector: Techniques and applications. ABC-CLIO.

Debrincat, G. (2014). The Effectiveness of Performance Appraisal Systems: Employee Relations and Human Resource Management. Germany: Anchor Academic Publishing.

Du, W. (2012). Informatics and management science IV. Springer Science & Business Media.

European Union News (2021) ‘Deidre Brock ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, what criteria will be applied to determine the allocation of the PS100m funding for the UK fishing industry announced by the Prime Minister on 30 December 2020’, 18 January. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edsgin&AN=edsgcl.649005858&site=eds-live&scope=site (Accessed: 7 June 2021).

Evans, G. E. (2004). Performance management and appraisal: A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. Neal Schuman Pub.

Flynn, W. J., Valentine, S. R., & Meglich, P. (2021). Healthcare human resource management. Cengage Learning.

Goel, D. (2012). Performance Appraisal and Compensation Management: A Modern Approach. India: PHI Learning.

Haerifar, P. (2011). Performance Management in Tesco. Dissertation. Germany: GRIN Verlag. Accessed June 7, 2021, www.google.com/books/edition/Performance_Management_in_Tesco

Handbook of Organizational Creativity. (2011). Germany: Elsevier Science.

Hanscom, M. E., Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J. N. (2018). Performance Appraisal and Management. United States: SAGE Publications.

Hutchinson, S. (2013). Performance Management: Theory and Practice. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.

Kopp, D. M. (2014). Human Resource Development: Performance through Learning. United States: Bridgepoint Education.

London, M., Mone, E. M. (2014). Employee Engagement through Effective Performance Management: A Practical Guide for Managers. United States: Taylor & Francis.

Malvezzi, S., Rebelo dos Santos, N., Kraiger, K., Passmore, J. (2020). The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement. Germany: Wiley.

McNamara, C. (2010). Field Guide to Leadership and Supervision in Business. United States: Authenticity Consulting, LLC.

Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. SAGE.

Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee Training and Development. United States: McGraw-Hill.

Page-Tickell, R. (2018). Learning and Development: A Practical Introduction. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.

Piskurich, G. M. (2015). Rapid instructional design: Learning ID fast and right. John Wiley & Sons.

Presswire (2020) ‘Worldwide Frozen Fish and Seafood Industry to 2024 – Key Drivers, Challenges and Trends, 26 November. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edsbig&AN=edsbig.A642870401&site=eds-live&scope=site (Accessed: 7 June 2021).

Rausch, E. (2015). Win-win performance management/Appraisal: A problem-solving approach. Wiley-Interscience.

Rothwell, W. J. (2013). Performance consulting: Applying performance improvement in human resource development. John Wiley & Sons.

Rothwell, W. J. (2013). Performance Consulting: Applying Performance Improvement in Human Resource Development. United Kingdom: Wiley.

Schippmann, J. S. (2013). Strategic Job Modeling: Working at the Core of Integrated Human Resources. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.

Schneier, C. E., Shaw, D. G., Beatty, R. W., & Baird, L. S. (2015). Performance measurement, management, and appraisal sourcebook. Human Resource Development.

Sheldon, N. E., Uren, M. L., Tovey, M. D. (2015). Managing Performance Improvement. Australia: Pearson Australia.

Soltani, E. and Wilkinson, A. (2020) ‘TQM and Performance Appraisal: Complementary or Incompatible?’ European Management Review, 17(1), pp. 57–82. Doi: 10.1111/emre.12317.

Tilley, K. W., & NATO Science Committee. (2013). Leadership and management appraisal: The proceedings of a NATO conference held in Brussels. English Universities Press; New York.

Varona, Z. C. (2017). Performance appraisal of the Bachelor of Science in community health graduates of the University of the Philippines: Perceptions of the graduates and employers.

Worley, C. G., Cummings, T. G. (2014). Organization Development and Change. United States: Cengage Learning.