Stalin’s Policies of the 1930s, Essay Example

In what ways were Stalin’s policies of the 1930s a logical culmination of the revolution of October 1917 and in what ways were they a break with that revolution?

Years before 1928 comprised of several economic situations that confronted the integrity if the Russian community in defining their position in line with the global economic status during the said era. It could be noticed that during the prewar years, the Russian community was able to suffice its people’s needs. However at the onset and the end-part of the war years, people have undergone a transition period that placed them in a situation that questioned their capability to suffice their own needs through the utilization of their own resources. It was as if the economic status of the country has entered a very chaotic stage. The implicative approach from which the operation of the nation dependent upon was not effective enough to enhance what the people own to make sure that each family becomes efficiently able to suffice their own personal needs for the sake of survival.

In accordance to the notes of history, the Bolsheviks Central Committee has considered the occurrence of an armed uprising which they think is already ripened up due to the time applicability of the situation they are currently in. During this time, the people who did not own a land were treated lowly and were compensated poorly for the efforts that they put forth in their work. Not only that, the ones owning the lands are the ones advancing further while their workers are the ones pushed towards poverty within their daily basis of living. It was remarkable how the wages of the workers fell up to 50% down while the cost of living was accounted to have been rising up to 70% which obviously imposes on the fact that people strongly believed that they needed something or at least someone to protect their rights and respond to their needs in a more conceivable manner (Dallin, 1953). During this time four thousand peasants enjoined in the revolution to set an uprising against their “lords” or their landowners. It was then very serious that the need to convey a more balanced approach to reestablishing Russia’s economy was a specific course to take. Privatization apparently caused particular discrimination in the country (Grenkevich, 1999). In the same manner, Germany also experienced this particular era in their history and it has been commented upon that the renting of land has specifically been causing economic depression especially on the part of those who do not own their personal properties(Why the German Republic Fell, 2011). Understandably, this proves that privatization needs to be abolished to impose on the development of the economic stability of each nation.

Then came Stalin’s year of domination and the promotion of the collectivization policy which was released between 1928 and 1940; this policy has pursued the consolidation of the individual land and labor to become collective farms which replace peasant farms as well as increased food supply for the urban society, empower the production of raw materials for the processing industry impose a more comprehensive approach in producing agricultural exports. It was at some point ambitious, however, it could not be denied that this has served as a culminating point on for the revolutionary era of the Russian society. True to its sense, the policy of Stalin provided more for the peasants. Given the fact that the peasants were the ones particularly encouraging revolution in the country, the changes in the agricultural sector whereas the peasants were given an equal portion of their produce created lower levels of food supply for the ones living in the urban areas. In opposition to the laws of privatization, the peasants gain at least an almost the same level of power with that of their richer counterparts. This allowed them to realize a better sense of satisfaction out from the efforts they apply for the production of the agricultural products they tend to. Successful as the policy was in reducing rebellion from peasantry, it could be analyzed how it has produced particular disadvantages on the part of the ones living in the urban areas. Nonetheless, it could not be denied that it did put a cessation on the course of revolutions that are incurred by the Russian communities against the administrators of the country.

In a way, in observance of what has happened in Russia, it could be analyzed how a cooperative party could actually make a difference in the community that they are intended to administer. This has been commented upon by the Modern History Sourcebook through imposing that for an administration process to be successful, cooperation between all the subjects involved should be present (2010). Somehow, in Germany, the same path of action has been taken by Adolf Hitler’s administration as they tried to create a more specific course of development for Germany. In a considerable relation to that of Stalin’s collectivization policy, Hitler’s NSDAP program notes a clause that relates how German unity is a well endowed desire of the people as part of the way they embrace the development of the society into the clauses of modernity (Modern History Sourcebook, 2010). True, during this time, it has been recognized that social equality could actually provide a more definite source of development for the community to follow which includes the need to be practically unified as one nation and not be divided due to economic and social issues.

References

Bruno Heilig, “Why the German Republic Fell”. http://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/111heil.html. (October 24,2011).

Dallin, Alexander, German Rule in Russia, 1941 – 1945: A Study of Occupation Politics (London, Macmillan, 1957), pp.346-51; Karl Brandt, Otto Schiller and Frantz Anlgrimm, Management of Agriculture and Food in the German-Occupied and Other Areas of Fortress Europe (Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 1953), pp.92ff. Ibid., pp.96-9.

Grenkevich, Leonid, The Soviet Partisan Movement, 1941-1945: A Critical Historiographical Analysis, Routledge, New York (1999), pp. 169-171.

Modern History Sourcebook: Benito Mussolini/What is Fascism, 1932. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/mussolini-fascism.asp. (October 24,2011).

Modern History Sourcebook: The 25 Points 1920/An Early Nazi Program. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/25points.asp. (October 24,2011).