The Effect of White Noise on Puzzle Completion Accuracy in Children, Research Paper Example

The objective of this study is to come up with a top notch, designated overview of the impacts of white noise which can be defined as the background noise on well-being, perception, learning as well as cognitive skills in children (early development). Specifically focusing on the way noise can harm speech comprehension and language understanding (for example, through masking). Even though most of the past studies did more research on adults, research reveals that children are as well relatively affected by listening in noised environment. Accordingly, the main goal is considering the way white noise can have impact on the children, who have are supposed to be learning and developing language in noisy environments in spite of them being concurrently less prepared to do that.

The review of the literature reveals that our understanding about impacts of chronic background noise upon children is up to date restricted and it doesn’t allow well-known expectations for children who live in certain noise exposed environments. In this research, we did an investigation on the effects of the white noise on children. Comprehending the effects of background noise on children is very important since children in most cases spend most of their time in noisy environments. Since noise can be specifically harmful in children’s development, attributing it’s impacts will enhance our comprehension in both the general development of a child and the manner in which it varies across various child’s environments.

Keywords: childhood education, white noise, cognitive development, attention, music

Introduction

White noise is the continuous background noise particularly which drives away other sounds. White noise is ever-present whereby it varies and far reaching impacts in a lot of areas which include perception of speech as well as learning. Noise as well can be a significant stressor, making public health attentions like straining in vocal, being irritated or struggling to sleep. Even though prevalent impacts of noise on individuals have been listed in several fields, there is still a lot unknown about the effects of noise on cognitive skills, behavior as well as well-being especially in children. Comprehending the way white noise impacts children is significant since children spend significant time in noisy environments.

Types of noise in children’s environments

Through this study, the word ‘noise’ is used to mean all the unwanted sound. Several unique kinds of noises are available in the environment of children and white noise is prevalent in most of the areas of these children as a result of loud volumes such in a classroom or daycare. During one’s listening, the white noise is channeled through the ear canal towards the eardrum collectively and consequently have similar response as auditory receptors and neural paths. Therefore it becomes hard to distinct noise and the wanted sound (normally speech) in unique pattern of depictions. Noise as well can overthrow speech leading to an imperfect depiction of the desired sound pattern of the speech hence affecting learning.

Some noises would be more probable to affect perception and learning compared to others. For instance, erratic and percussive sounds such as hooting of cars and noises varying in frequency and pitch with time like speech may have higher interruption compared to noises which are comparatively steady-state with time. Nevertheless, such processes are aimed at quantifying steady-state noises in unoccupied classrooms instead of the probable problems human created sounds available in a classroom. Due to that, those approaches can underrate the probability of noise which children face.  However, children growing up in diverse environments probably face distinct amounts and kinds of noise. For instance, those in urban areas are probably facing more noise as a result of traffic and other people, while poor people are probable to experience large classrooms in institution leading to noisier learning surrounding. It is more likely that housing and the size of family might impact the level of noise at home.

Effects of Noise on Health

One effect of noise on children well-being is specifically on hearing. Being exposed frequently to loud sounds being produced from sources like loud music, machines, and weapons can cause significant or other times lasting hearing decrements as a result of harm of the cochlear hair cells. However, the period of exposure to noise and the volume of the noise both have a significant effect in a way that frequent, louder sounds and longer time exposure lead to more extreme impacts compared to the impact of quieter and less frequent noise. From animal research, these impacts can be more in younger individuals for instance children. On top of harming the hearing ability, noise have other multiple impacts on children’s health. From the teachers’ and students’ report that noise can be considerable origin of frustration, and teachers are specifically vulnerable to vocal strain and chronic harshness from increasing their voices for the learners to hear them. Noise based stress can lead to physical impacts, together with headaches, ulcers as well as atypical cortisol intensities and regulating the blood pressure. It can as well have an impact on sleeping, leading to fatigue and other health issues associated with sleep. Noise in children can also be result to social isolation in several teams such as children bearing autism mostly show sharp sensitivity of noise and evade noisy environments which is a situation similar to older people with impaired hearing problems.

Impacts of Noise on Perception and Comprehension

To effectively understand speech in the existence of white noise, at least, the listener should be capable of hearing the speech over the background noise, distinct the speech from the white noise, and then continuously attend to the right signal. Moreover, any of either stages stated can be interrupted by noise; whereby it can affect perception either via energetic veiling. Energetic veiling is comparatively least conceptual phenomena in which energy from veil shields up a target signal, or causes it to be noiseless. Informational veiling is a higher-level phenomenon existing when targeted signal is noticed, though a listener can fail to distinct a target from a masker or can be unsuccessful in attending the accurate signal. This means that the target and masker can combine together leading the listener to uncertainty which sounds fit in which signal. The two veiling can impair the capability of perception and comprehension of speech in the context; the effect relies on circumstances like the ratio of signal to noise of the target and background noise and its frequency overlap.

Children need greater ratios of signal to noise compared to grownups in order for an effective perception. Even though one possibility is that children face hard time since the auditory system is still not mature. As a result they struggle to listen in noise compared to adults especially when the background noise is made of speech. Comprehending the speech in the moment of background noise made of speech is a bit difficult compared to other veils with grownups, apparently both as a result of overlap of the frequency among the signals raises energetic veiling while since masker’s diverse time elements and propensity of conveying the meaning raise the informational veiling. Very young children face difficulties to recognize their names along other typical words while in noisy environment especially that made of speech of a single speaker. However, perception of speech with constant type of background speech reveals to be mature at age of 10 years while impairment on perception is faced up to the age of 16 years. Generally, children may face more informational veiling compared to grownups. For instance, children show very high detection rates of pure tones exhibited with isolated frequency veils that are not supposed to produce energetic masking, and fight to differentiate speech noise in the incidence of like maskers. This issue probably exists into considerable of childhood; preschoolers and age of a school child as well face higher informational veils compared to grownups.

Thus, the discrepancy between the initial maturity of hearing capabilities, and the disproportionate problems children undergo while they listen in background noise maybe as a result of other causes such as the cognitive abilities and individual knowledge. It is uncertain to what degree the struggle lies in differentiating objectives from distractors and distractibility whereby they are both elements of informational veiling and are difficult to disentangle. One probably children culprit challenges of listening in noisy environments can be due to diversities of attention: including a failure to particularly present to objective scream and a propensity of listening in a frequency range instead of tuning in to the particular areas most probably to be informative. The argument corresponds with the study showing the growth of certain attention is prolonged, and can assist in illustrating the reason in which adolescents time to time face difficulties in listening in noise. It is an encouraging probability whereby we are now researching to test if the intensity of white noise on puzzle completion accuracy on children.

The challenge of children in noise can as well be based on their knowledge ability instead of maturational form; grownup second language learners who in the same way face restricted language knowhow as well face a problem in listening in a noisy environment. Children may need significant hearing and language contribution to help in developing enough levels of representations strong to be recognized in non-ultimate listening situations. Grownups can be specifically favored compared to children in case where input is anticipated from previous experiences. Adults possess higher know-how on the world and normal concepts, and can be able of relying on the same experiences to improve comprehension, despite young listeners. However, contrasting to young children, a listener with more language know-how or greater vocabularies may fulfill in the breaches if information is tarnished or unavailable.

Effects of Noise on Learning

However, even in cases where speech is outdone by the background noise, the unwanted sounds can affect the capability of a learner from comprehending the input, both through leaving less resources obtainable to learn, or creating listening specifically taxing. Moreover, distraction can be caused by background noise leading to shifting of attention and failure of information encrypting, even with readily perceptible objectives. There is probability of more significant and permanent impacts to be produced by the learning impairment from a signal. Moreover, the learning impairments probably induce certain issues for children whereby their language growth relies sharply on acquiring language input, and who are consequently least armed to execute language in background noise compared to adults. Actually, children face a lot of difficult in learning words with a noisy background. Additionally, initial language challenges probably lead to flowing difficulties in various domains as well as academic achievements, since instructional information in various fields such as physics, mathematics and history depends on the teacher’s oral delivery. In fact, study show aircraft noises adversely affect the school academic success of a child.

Is White Noise Detrimental?

Even though background noise can always adversely affect language processing and learning, in some circumstances noise can improve performance, especially steady-state veils at little volumes such as generator sound and instrumental music of comparatively consistent amplitude. Reduced levels of constant background noise can assist in covering up intermittent noise, which is probably a bit challenging to tune out, probably illustrating why some people choose sleeping with noisy generators or working in abstemiously noisy coffee premises. Background music can improve enjoyment of job, can support ones attention and hence creating an effective learning environment but then there is evidence that background music can adversely affect the learning of a child. Background noise has the potential of increasing the physiological arousal to a certain point and then drops down. This is because the peak level of arousal for peak performance level may be different for different people, ultimate intensity of noisy can also be different. For instance, the quantity of attention needed for a certain task can tell if the background noise is helpful, hindering, or it doesn’t have any impact. Noise can help in various manner, through altering the specificity of auditory word representations. From the various researches, the diversity in a signal can improve the ability of generalizing, and noise can probably add to that diversity.

The above studies show the various effects the background noise may have in a child. They have illustrated the impacts on learning, cognitive and knowledge concepts of background music on children. However, this study is further investigating on particularly the effect of white noise on the puzzle completion in children. This is among the first studies to focus on this particular field of impacts of background music.

Participants

In this study, fifty subjects participated in the research. These included 43 Caucasian and 7 African Americans aged between 2 years and 12 years. When the study was wholly described to the participants, we obtained a written conversant agreement. A large number of the participants (N=38) were drafted from a group of school children, adolescent children (N=12) and preschool children (N=26) carried out at the University of California Mental Health and cognitive program. The remaining twelve participants were drafted from an ADHD diagnosing activity for general public or through a word of mouth. The group of participants in the research consistent of 29 boys and 21 girls having an average age of 7.63 years (SD=3.98). Every participant was afraid of speaking in public and hence conformed to the strategy of the DSM-?-R Structured Clinical Interview (DSCI) through generalizing 42 and specifying 8; speaking in public.

Apparatus

The study conducted an unpaid exercise to the participants for taking part in the study. However, the study employed an exclusion strategy which involved a generational past of DSM-?-R disorder, organic mental illness, schizophrenia, recent axis 1 illness apart from SAD, any current fatal chronic illness, past experience of negative effects of study participation, and probable medication form that can contraindicate one reasonable exclusion from a search study. It employed a puzzle completion rating scale, a 10 piece puzzle and a simple 10 minute math test.

Study Design

Repeated measures strategy was used as the design in this study utilizing two unexpected puzzle completion exercise in one test session. The children were given a puzzle to complete in three types of backgrounds which include one with music which has lyrics, another one with music without lyrics and the last one without any music. A 10 piece puzzle was presented to them to complete in 2 minutes within the three different conditions. The selected music was “You are Welcome” derived from a Disney film called “Moana”. The assumption and anticipated results was that the children will be more accurate and faster within a quiet environment. However, if white noise affects the cognitive and attention of children, the participants should reveal more wrong results and take a lot of time to concentrate compared to when given the similar test in a quiet environment.

Dependent Measures

An adjusted form of the subjective units of attention scale was utilized in assessing individual performance in noise during the three tests. The puzzle completion attention scale had a range of 0 to 7, whereby 1 indicated severe effect. A past study reinforced the validity of this strategy in measuring cognitions in a noise and no noise environment. The amount of time an individual could take to complete the puzzle was utilized as the technique for behavioral measure of attentiveness or inattentiveness. High attentiveness was revealed and recorded if an individual would score in a no noise environment.

Procedure

During the study day, the participants were prompted that puzzle test would be involved and either a simple math test can be carried out to measure the cognitive ability of each child before the study was done. They had also been prompted to stay in the environment for 1 hour before they started the test to ensure no environmental conditions affected them. Considering the test was given after one hour since they did the math test, the total familiarizing period was two hours before taking the puzzle test.

After the initial 10 minutes time was ended, and the participants were led to another room where they sat across four audience participants. The session was accompanied by a camera right in front of the participants. Each participant was instructed based on the puzzle completion scale and active physiologic monitoring machine was linked. The 1 hour phase for adapting was started through initiating music at the background and the physiological monitoring machine as well as finding the first individual puzzle completion rating. Heart rate was measured constantly and individual puzzle completion rating recorded at 4 minutes center point and at 8 minutes finale point at this phase of adapting. Participants were prompted not to speak or move out during the time. The second; anticipation phase, started by participants being the 10 piece puzzle test with music instrumental prior to the test, whereby each illustrated the one’s capability to utilize in the attention and cognitive skills phase. Subjects involved queries based on the recent and family occasions too to find out if they could be potential hindrances.

The three audience panel was made of at least one man and one woman. Each child was supposed to finish a 10 minute math test until the 10 minutes expired. After the end of 10 minutes, the participant was then supposed to start a 1 hour recovery phase and the audience partakers who were not part of the researchers were free to leave. Physiological monitoring still went on and puzzle completion rating were recorded at the start, at four minutes center point and at the recovery phases’ finale point.

When the first recovery phase was over, the participants were offered records associated with the results of the math test they took and their performance during the test. When the inventories were finalized, the participants were given a 3 minutes break to let them rest since they had received the first puzzle for the study before the second puzzle completion exercise period began with music without lyrics. This activity was made to increase the reliability of the study design and the results accrued from the research. The third puzzle completion test was done whereby the children were given a 10 piece puzzle to complete in a quiet environment and the results were recorded in the puzzle completion rating scale.

After the one hour cessation, the initial puzzle test session scheduled for 2 minutes was initiated. 2 of 5 (N=20) participants were given a different puzzle and the remaining (N=30) were given different one. Considering these three-test period, the similar phases of adapting, anticipating, doing and recovery were done. The audience in doing phase were the same as in all the three different conditions tests. The participants who didn’t want to take the test this time were free to leave while those who had received it were prompted to remain at the study center for more time to complete the anticipated steps and results of the study.

Statistical Analysis

For repeated measures, analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square analyses and tests by the student were employed as illustrated. In analyses of various repeated measures, the amount of data points presented for every phase of a certain specific speech test were varying. Considering analyses of repeated measures need equal amount of observations for every experimental phase, randomized collection of the obtainable data points was utilized in producing equivalent amount or lengths of observations across the different phases of the puzzle completion tests. Repeated measures analyses which are reported are merely statistically critical and particularly critical non-significant outcomes.

Results

A 2 by 2 combined ANOVA as done including one between-participant aspect, team; typical attention and inattentive and another one within-participants factor, encrypting circumstance; little noise against loud noise. We selected the ordinary scoring method in the action memory literature in which strict scoring is employed towards the nouns (precise matches were needed) while light scoring is employed towards verbs (in which non-precise matches were taken as accurate). That was as a result of recalling nouns as somehow typically easier compared to verbs. It didn’t reveal major effect of noise (F(48,2) = .02, p = .91) or team (F(48,2) = .31, p = .57). There was no significant gender difference on the results obtained as all the participants performed upon a similar level across the three environmental conditions. Moreover, the effect of background noise and children performance as significant (F(48,2) = 9.93, p = .004, eta² = .16). This impact was supplementary explored with planned simple contrasts for the within participants elements, utilizing paired sample tests.

Correspondingly to the study hypothesis, the induction of white noise tended to increase some of the children performance who were late classified as the inattentive group (M = .24 vs. .20). These kind of participants (inattentive group) got a better performance in high noise environment than low noise environment (t(8) = 1.78, p = .04 one-tailed). Unlike the other children (attentive group) who performed poorly in high noise environment and better in a low noise environment (t(39) = -.41, p = .002). The greater score for inattentiveness, the higher the positive impact of noise and the opposite is true, attentive individuals’ recorded poor results in a noisy environment.

Figure 1

Discussion

As anticipated from the study hypotheses, the results reveal the effect of noise on children from a sample collected from normal population. This revealed noticeable

References

Allen, R., & Pammer, K. (2018). The impact of concurrent noise on visual search in children with ADHD. Journal of attention disorders, 22(14), 1344-1353.

Angwin, A. J., Wilson, W. J., Copland, D. A., Barry, R. J., Myatt, G., & Arnott, W. L. (2018). The impact of auditory white noise on semantic priming. Brain and language, 180, 1-7.

Baijot, S., Slama, H., Söderlund, G., Dan, B., Deltenre, P., Colin, C., & Deconinck, N. (2016). Neuropsychological and neurophysiological benefits from white noise in children with and without ADHD. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 12(1), 1-13.

Batho, L. P., Martinussen, R., & Wiener, J. (2020). The effects of different types of environmental noise on academic performance and perceived task difficulty in adolescents with ADHD. Journal of attention disorders, 24(8), 1181-1191.

Cook, A., Bradley?Johnson, S., & Johnson, C. M. (2014). Effects of white noise on off?task behavior and academic responding for children with ADHD. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 47(1), 160-164.

Dekerle, M., Meunier, F., N’Guyen, M. A., Gillet-Perret, E., Lassus-Sangosse, D., & Donnadieu, S. (2013, August). Development of central auditory processes and their links with language skills in typically developing children. In interspeech (pp. 3162-3166).

Helps, S. K., Bamford, S., Sonuga-Barke, E. J., & Söderlund, G. B. (2014). Different effects of adding white noise on cognitive performance of sub-, normal and super-attentive school children. PloS one, 9(11), e112768.

Herweg, N. A., & Bunzeck, N. (2015). Differential effects of white noise in cognitive and perceptual tasks. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1639.

Othman, E., Yusoff, A. N., Mohamad, M., Manan, H. A., Giampietro, V., Abd Hamid, A. I., … & Burhanuddin, W. I. D. W. (2019). Low intensity white noise improves performance in auditory working memory task: An fMRI study. Heliyon, 5(9), e02444.

Pickens, T. A., Khan, S. P., & Berlau, D. J. (2019). White noise as a possible therapeutic option for children with ADHD. Complementary therapies in medicine, 42, 151-155.

Smith, A. (2012). An update on noise and performance: Comment on Szalma and Hancock (2011).

Söderlund, G. B., Åsberg Johnels, J., Rothén, B., Torstensson?Hultberg, E., Magnusson, A., & Fälth, L. (2021). Sensory white noise improves reading skills and memory recall in children with reading disability. Brain and Behavior, e02114.

Söderlund, G. B., Björk, C., & Gustafsson, P. (2016). Comparing auditory noise treatment with stimulant medication on cognitive task performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: results from a pilot study. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1331.

Söderlund, G. B., Sikström, S., Loftesnes, J. M., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. (2010). The effects of background white noise on memory performance in inattentive school children. Behavioral and brain functions, 6(1), 1-10.

Wass, S. V., Daubney, K., Golan, J., Logan, F., & Kushnerenko, E. (2019). Elevated physiological arousal is associated with larger but more variable neural responses to small acoustic change in children during a passive auditory attention task. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 37, 100612.