The International Conflict in the World of Boxing, Essay Example

 The whole world has long been waiting for the meet-up between Manny Pacquiao and Mayweather; a reason why when the event actually happened, everyone was all eyes to what was going to be the result of the fight. Dismayed, many followers of Pacquiao booed the actions of Mayweather especially in relation to how he handled the whole fight. This is the primary theme of the detailed blog of Tony Deebs with regards the report of Mayweather taking a new step towards the case that is being filed against Pacquiao. According to the blog of Deebs, the WBO has decided to strip of Mayweather from his achievements from the fight; especially because of the fact that he has gone against the rule of holding just one belt for the whole season. Not being able to decide what to keep for his title, he was actually noted to be keeping both and directly going against the said rule.

However, upon agreement and settling, both WBC and WBO decided to allow Mayweather keep both belts as they have recognized that the boxer has earned such title based on all the efforts he has put forward for such events. The blog author questions so much about this matter; affecting the ways by which administrational superiority works in sports and how favoritism on their part actually affect the value of such authority. Noticeably, Deebs was able to point out this matter based on how he thinks the bias of the administrators actually affected the decision of both WBC and WBO. Relatively, this shows how rules could be bent to provide a reflective support to what everyone else wants provide their favorite athletes with.

This blog reflects a distinct sense of determination on how authoritative rules actually work in sporting events such as boxing. Seen from this example, Deebs, the author of the blog, actually wants to point out how money does imply a distinct sense of control in sports and towards most of its actors, players and administrators. Bending the rules often happen when one organization or authoritative body favors one party over the other [especially when this involves competing parties] is a common matter that happens not only in boxing but also in other sports. Most often than not, the work of the authorities to protect every player or every contender from being discriminatively treated in their fields of expertise becomes scanty enough when it comes to dealing with favorites or famous names in the sports field the athletes are enjoined with.

Practically, people have been over the case of Pacquiao and Mayweather ever since the fight. The cause of such commotion may have been due to another issue, but the emergence of this favorable attention given to that of Mayweather’s owning of two belts in relation to the said fight makes a distinct sense of indication on how everything else in the said sports field could be accomplished through favors and adjustments of the rules. This creates a notion of whether or not decisions in the field of sports competitions could still be trusted.

The blog, overall, provides a strong insistence on how good mandate of the situation being examined could be given full care for. Picking the topic on one of the most sought-after events in the field of international boxing makes this particular blog interesting enough to read and intriguing enough to measure. Most often than not, it could be understood that the message of the blog is to actually raise a sense of understanding among readers especially on how they are able to understand the basic rules of the sports industry, especially when it comes to dealing with competitive ideals and policies that would basically define the ways by which their ‘idols’ in the industry are treated. Raising such awareness among readers make this particular blog specifically useful when it comes to making a distinct sense of implication on how athletes actually become dictated as puppets especially when it comes to determining how their reputations are developed through the news and the ways by which they are given a specific term of knowledge that the public would be able to appreciate or not [based on their personal decisions]. Serving as a marketing blog, the author’s data could be found on linkedin and in other social networks as a trusted writer of the said sports field.

Works Cited

Deebs, T. (2015). Will Mayweather take the stand that Pacquiao should’ve taken? http://boxingbuzz.sportsblog.com/posts/2794487/will-mayweather-take-the-stand-that-pacquiao-should—ve-taken-.html. Retrieved on July, 7, 2015.