White-Collar Crime, Essay Example

Based from the case provided, both John and Victor are under a sworn state that specifically holds them responsible for utilizing the SSA software they have provided their client with. Although they were the minds behind the said innovation, the fact that they have already sold it to their client makes the copyright of the said software belonging to their client at the point of payment. John’s utilization of the SSA and his gaining profit from such utilization strongly indicate a breach of contract. Under this particular law, it is stipulated that whatever has been agreed upon by two or more parties should be put into writing and should be honored accordingly by those involved in it. Considerably, not being able to honor such code of honor between client and provider makes a distinct impact on the value of the agreement created.

In the case of John and  Victor, once the copyright has been sold to their clients, they are have no more right using the said program for either personal or business use. The fact that they have gained profit from such operation makes such act considered as a form of stealing. Another consideration to note is Victor’s role in the case. True, he did not directly engage in the act, however, being a partner of John, he had the responsibility to make sure that the agreement was clearly followed. Knowing what his partner was doing and not acting upon it subjects him to the same condition of judgment that John would be held accountable for. The reason behind this is the fact that partners in business are considered as one unit, an entity that exists as one. Whatever the other commits, the other is directly affected and at some point considered involved.

These two particular concepts of the law ought to be applied in determining the role of Victor and John in the mal-use of the SSA program outside of the agreement that they have with their client to whom they have already sold the program to. Committing these acts simply hold John and Victor both accountable to the legal sanctions of doing their business.