Why Stricter Gun Laws Are Not Needed in the US, Essay Example

Introduction

Whenever guns are mentioned, many people often think of the negative impact on society. This is understandable, especially following recent incidents of mass shootings in various public spaces, including schools. However, the importance of guns in protecting the masses from aggressors, both armed or otherwise, is rarely mentioned. I am a criminologist, and my duties center on assessing all aspects of crime and coming up with approaches to reduce recidivism and prevent criminal behaviors among United States Citizens. As an insider in the security sector, I can authoritatively say that the problem is not the laws but rather bigger societal issues that need to be addressed. As stated by Shattuck and Mathias, the laws are there and well rooted within the Second Amendment, where those dishonorably dismissed from the military, the mentally disabled, and convicted criminals are prohibited from owning firearms (3). I believe that our country does not need stricter gun laws but rather more education and sensitization on proper and legal gun usage. 

The United States is a nation led and guided by laws, and the Second Amendment is not an exception. Gun ownership is as much a right as the rest contained in the constitution. As stated by Schutten et al., this particular Amendment was meant for the militia, which primarily implies protection to self and society as a whole. I believe that this is a valid perspective on gun ownership because the availability of these weapons in the hands of the citizens is enough crime deterrent. Owning a gun is a fundamental right that adheres to what the law states and enhances people’s sense of safety and belonging. Taking away this right from Americans is akin to taking away our independence and security. Everyone in our country has a responsibility to help enhance safety and security in their communities. Having access to guns goes a long way in ensuring that people can be of help to themselves and others in times of danger. 

It is important to note that even though significant, gun-related deaths are nowhere closer to the leading causes of death in America. According to the CDC, Americans are more likely to die from other reasons such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes than from guns, whether by suicide, accident, or homicide. While looking at this issue from an international perspective, it is clear that the claim that firearm homicide is a major issue is exaggerated, considering that the US is ranked 28th in global homicide rates. To a large extent, the laws already in place have been effective in keeping illegal gun ownership and usage low. 

As many of us have observed, the debate on increasing gun control laws mainly takes place after a major mass shooting. According to Moore, Matthew, and Bergner, those opposed to private gun ownership argue that the only solution to prevent such incidents is only by having stricter laws. However, I see this as a one-dimensional perspective on a larger societal issue—such a reaction amount to applying a knee-jack reaction to solve gun violence. Proponents of increased gun laws are not ready for the larger conversation about the root cause of gun violence, such as economic inequalities, racism, and mental health issues. Therefore, it is crucial for the US to deeply reflect on the root cause of gun ownership issues. 

Conclusion

As I conclude, I would like to say that guns are with us to stay; they are an import and part of what we regard as security or safety and, to a large extent, our national identity. The claim that guns are the primary cause of violence and death in the country is wrong. The problem is much deeper, and blaming gun ownership is only trying to treat the symptoms while ignoring the root cause completely. I believe that I have presented a compelling argument on why we do not need more gun laws. I would like you to help advance this argument by consistently presenting your views and petitions to our legislative leaders whenever the fight against gun ownership is raised. It is our collective responsibility to protect the constitution, especially when it comes to safety and security. Safety and security begin with you; guns are not our enemy but our freedom. I am grateful for this opportunity to highlight an essential issue in our country. Thank you all. 

Works Cited

CDC, “Data & Statistics (WISQARS),” wisqars.cdc.gov (accessed April 8, 2022)

Moore, Matthew D., and C. M. Bergner. “The relationship between firearm ownership and violent crime.” Justice Policy Journal 13.1 (2016): 1-20.

Schutten, Nathaniel M., et al. “Understanding Gun Ownership in the Twenty-First Century: Why Some Americans Own Guns, but Most Do Not.” Justice Quarterly (2021): 1-24.

Shattuck, John, and Mathias Risse. “Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the United States: Freedom of Speech and Media.” (2021). 2-10.