Correcting the Image of American Mental Health Care, Essay Example

A Steps of creating the decision flowchart

Among the steps involved in the process of creating the decision flowchart is the consideration on the overall nature of preparing a study’s process of completion. IN doing so, the value of the statistical process to be used is better defined, thus creating a sense of control on how the variables are to be treated in consideration with the ideal procedures by which the study is supposed to follow through a pattern of development that would give the study a strong and applicable conclusion of matters.

Another consideration that was given attention in the creation of the flowchart was that of the process by which the thinking of a researcher is governed by his desire to make his study worthwhile, thus defining the worth of his work in terms of psychological applicability of the results to be gained from such point of studying a particular topic or issue of development.

Steps of decision making related to the decision tree

1. The first step in creating the flow chart has been directed towards giving attention on the most important elements of the research thus creating a more defined indication on what factors are most important to be added into the process of applying statistical analysis operations that would be a best fit for the study.
2. The second step is concerned with the proper choice of statistical analysis process based on the variables to be involved in the research and how they ought to be treated depending on the way they affect the whole value of the study.
3. The second step is focused on making sure that the statistical analysis to be used fits the study’s goals hence improving the ways by which the hypothesis of the study is measured and responded to.

Reflections on Activity:

In this particular activity, three particular statistical observation and analysis procedures are given attention to. One is the Analysis of Variance or ANOVA. Another is the regression analysis; and lastly, the correlation and dependence analysis procedure. These three options of research statistics analysis procedures are used depending on the nature of the study being completed and the value that the variables are supposed to handle especially for the sake of developing the worth of applicability of the research as it is being completed.

In completing this activity, the most comprehensive process of consideration taken into account involves the measurement of elements that ought to be given attention to in developing a research that is best able to provide response to current issues being dealt with in the society. Practically, this activity challenged the critical thinking process that is required when creating an inference on the defining base that practically applies to the modern process of studying topics that relate to issues in psychology and the human sciences.

Studies and Research on Psychology

This section shall examined two particular psychological studies relating to cognitive behavioral therapy and how the different procedures of statistical analysis have been applied to be able to gain comprehensive results that made both researches worthy of being applied in actual situations and resolving issues that are important for the field being researched upon. To note, the two studies to be used as reference for this part of the activity include Francher’s (1999) Cultures of healing: Correcting the image of American mental health care and Menzies’ (et al, 2009) Cognitive behavior therapy for adults who stutter: A tutorial for speech-language pathologists”. These studies were chosen as they both respond to the mental healthcare issues that affect human individuals through the comprehensive application of the principles and procedures of cognitive behavior therapy.

Research questions

Francher’s (1999) study intended to answer the question of how the different cultures of healing across different communities in the US could actually be gathered together and tested to measure which of these particular procedures work the best for the cases being resolved by the said field of mental health assistance. On the other hand, Menzies’ (et al, 2009) study questions whether or not cognitive behavioral therapy actually works with individuals having actual mental irregularity that basically concerns their capacity to function normally [in this case relating to how they speak].

Hypothesis

The research by Francher insists on how culture-defined therapies would help in addressing specific problems dealt with by individuals following or belonging to a particular culture. Meanwhile, Menzies’ (et al) work tries to create a more vivid picture on how a specific problem in speech could be cured by cognitive behavioral therapy based on the manner by which the process is applied to a number of individuals serving as the participants to the research.

Research Variables 

The research variables for the study of Francher involve the cultural backgrounds that were used, measured and observed in the study. These elements serve as the core source of competence that is able to provide a more valuable backbone to the research. As for the study completed by Menzie (et al), the concentration is on the variable of response that the participants were observed to provide in relation to the procedures of testing that has been applied during the completion of the research.

Application of Psychological Statistics Choice Determination

With the two studies in focus, it is important to note that [basing from the decision flowchart created for the previous part of this activity], the variables to be used in the research be identified properly and be given full attention as to how they contribute to the overall completion of the study. What variables are to be used and how are they supposed to be observed based on how they affect each other and how they contribute to the establishment and response to the hypothesis raised as part of the study’s basic value? For Francher’s study, it is important to know how definitive insistence on culture is related to curing needed to be established. Choosing the right approach to the determination of the value of the statistical data gathered for the study could then be based on how the participants are to take their place in the overall standing of the study. In this case, it would be safe to say that the best choice would be regression analysis as it does correlatively measures the connection between two supporting variables [in this case the cultural background of the participants, measured in par with the response they impose on the thinking of the individuals as they face the actual problems relating to their mental issues usually involving anomalies of their adapted thinking process].

As for the study completed by Menzie and his colleagues, it would be best to take note of the actual goal of the research [which is to measure the applicability of cognitive behavioral therapy in resolving an actual emerging issue within a specific group of individuals being observed]. In this case, it would be safe to agree upon the use of correlation and dependence as it does impose on the value of cause-and-effect that occurs between variables involved in the research.

Going through this activity reminds of the importance of decision making especially when it comes to determining the course of development that a particular research ought to give attention to. The expected results ought to provide a more definite consideration on how the variables in a study are treated and how they are to be used to make a distinct impact on the problems to which they are expected to serve as a source of reflective resolution. Considerably though, the use of the decision flowchart created for this activity has its limitations. It cannot be denied that there are instances when specific imbalance and unseen factors create problems on the actual measure of the value of the research and its application to actual situations concerning the human society. These unpredictable elements and factors of concern often challenge the condition by which researchers intend to treat the real worth of the variables that they are going to use in the research. These elements would be the determining factors on whether or not the research would be most reliable for actual application in real life situations.

The primary challenge that was taken into account during this whole process relies on how the different elements of research ought to be realized, established and understood to have connected relationship between each other especially when it comes to assuming how these factors ought to contribute to the overall value of the research itself. These factors, including the different variables involved in the cases being resolved, ought to provide a more definite sense of distinction on how the research procedures are to be taken into account. These procedures of analysis that are to be applied to give a determinable value to the statistical data collected by the researchers intend to make a definite contribution to the overall aspect of applicability and validity that the study has over the resolution hoping to be embraced by the researchers.

In the field of psychology, this option of noting and examining matters is an important aspect of development [especially in terms of understanding the connection of human’s basic values and response and the resulting end that makes these considerations rather extensive especially in serving the primary concerns of the group of individuals primarily being addressed in the research being completed. The valuation of these different factors all contribute to giving psychological researches a sense of validity especially in addressing specific cases that affects the human [variables] of such concerns. Thoroughly thinking through what particular statistical analysis approach ought to be used to see measure the value of chosen variables contribute to the creation of a workable foundation by which the research is to be recognized accordingly.

References

Fancher, R. T. (1995). Cultures of healing: Correcting the image of American mental health care (p. 231). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Menzies, Ross G.; Onslow, Mark; Packman, Ann; O’Brian, Sue (2009). “Cognitive behavior therapy for adults who stutter: A tutorial for speech-language pathologists”. Journal of Fluency Disorders 34