Cyberspace, Research Paper Example

COVID-19 and the international financial crisis, Refugee problem, and Environmental pollution. Humans do not have time because they are living in a global setup grounded on advanced communication and transportation technology. The story of another country is no longer a story of another country. A conflict in a faraway country could turn into our country’s economic recession. It is an expressive crisis, but most people still act like it is not their problem. In this paper, I will explore the importance of cyberspace in this global economy and why it is essential to research the topic. I will also go over the fifth session of the UN GGE, which finished in 2017, and the sixth session, which began in 2020, of the UN Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Setting of International Security (UN GGE). I will analyze the international law appropriate for future cyber processes and the theoretical expectation of this research. Finally, I will discuss the limitations of our study and suggest future research plans.

Research Question

This paper seeks to answer the following research question:

What international laws and standards apply to future cyber processes?

What theoretical expectations can we have from the research?

Literature Review

The literature review in this paper will explore existing research regarding cyber processes, international laws and standards for cyber processes, and the U.N. Group of Governmental Experts (UN GGE). Cyber processes in this essay refer to using computer systems, networks, and software to carry out online activities. This encompasses the sharing and swapping of info between different nations as well as within the same nation.

In terms of international laws, UN GGE plays a major role in developing and implementing cyber processes. The fifth session of the UN GGE was held in 2013, and its primary goal was establishing an international legal framework for cyber processes (Adamson, Liisi p45-56). This led to adopting the Non-binding Guidelines for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace (Assembly p23-27). The UN GGE’s sixth session is now taking place, and its main goal is to create a legally enforceable instrument applicable to global cyber procedures (Body p12-19). Other groups, including the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), are also crucial in the creation and application of global cyber-process regulations.

The Covid-19 outbreak has caused a dramatic change in cyber processes during the past few years. This has made it essential to research international laws and standards applicable to future cyber processes and the theoretical expectations of such research (Brunner and Isabella p87-93). The appearance of new technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain has been one significant revolution in this industry. Due to this, new international rules and standards have been created that must be considered in order to guarantee the security and safety of cyber processes (Delerue and François, p. 34–37). For instance, the ITU recently adopted the Cybersecurity Guidelines for Smart Cities, which apply to all smart city initiatives. Cyberspace also became close to us during this period, and it is essential to research the international laws and standards applicable to future cyber processes (Eggenschwiler and Jaqueline p40-45). In addition, various theoretical expectations can be identified from such research. These encompass the need to foster a climate of trust between nations, the creation of new multilateral laws and norms that apply to cyber activities, and the acknowledgment of privacy rights with relation to digital information.

The UN GGE is a key factor in developing international cyber-process laws and standards. It is a forum that explores cyber processes’ political, legal, technical, and operational aspects. The UN GGE is also responsible for developing the Non-binding Guidelines for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace, which is the basis for international laws and standards applicable to cyber processes (Garcia and Eugenio p24-31). Other organizations, such as the ITU, also significantly set international laws and standards regarding cyber processes.

Theoretical expectation

Theoretically, this research should show that current international laws and norms are insufficient to adequately govern cyber processes. This anticipation is based on a review of the literature that has revealed a number of inconsistencies and difficulties in the existing international norms and regulations for cyber procedures. Additionally, the theoretical expectation is that new technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence will create additional challenges for effectively regulating cyber processes.

Furthermore, the research hopes to spot potential policy proposals that can be used to confront these gaps and obstacles in international cyber laws and standards. These policy proposals will include suggestions for fresh or amended regulations, as well as the creation of an adjudicatory mechanism for existing rules. Besides, the research will identify the potential implications of new technologies, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence, on data ownership and privacy rights. This will help inform future policy decisions and assess the effectiveness of current regulations.

Finally, this research also expects to identify any potential areas of research that can be used to explore further the implications of existing international laws and standards for cyber processes. This will help inform future research efforts in this field and provide direction for further exploration in cyber security. Overall, this research aims to understand better the legal, political, and technological aspects of cyber processes, and to identify potential solutions for better regulation of these processes.

Theoretical framework

The theoretical context of this paper is grounded on the research question: “What international law and standards are applicable for future cyber processes?” The key objective of this study is to discover the international commandments and standards appropriate to future cyber progressions. This included exploring the theoretical expectations of such research and the role of relevant international organizations in setting laws and standards (Henriksen and Anders p45-56). It also explored how existing international law and standards can be applied to new technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence.

A comprehensive theoretical framework is essential for understanding cyber processes’ international legal, political, and technological context. This entailed investigating the roles of appropriate international agencies, such as the UN General Assembly and the International Telecommunication Union, in establishing laws for cyber operations (Levinson and Nanette p10-15). As mentioned previously, the UN GGE is responsible for developing the Non-binding Guidelines for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace which are a key component of this research (Pytlak and Allison p68-73). Other organizations, such as the ITU, have also been involved in setting international cyber-process laws and standards (Maroz and Nataliya p60-73). This research will explore how these organizations can be used to develop and implement international laws and standards for cyber processes.

The theoretical framework of this research also included exploring the theoretical expectations of such research, as these are essential for understanding the legal and political aspects of cyber processes. This included investigating the need for different countries to create a trusting environment, developing new international guidelines applicable to cyber practices, and recognizing privacy rights relating to cyber data. This research also explored the potential implications of applying existing international laws and standards to new technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence.

Finally, this research also considered the implications of international laws and standards for cyber processes, as this is essential for understanding the implications of such research. This included investigating how international treaties and principles will affect cyber process security, along with the potential effects on the world’s political and economic stability. Additionally, this research explored the implications of international laws and standards for cyber processes on human rights, as this is essential for understanding the overall impact of such research. This research also considered the implications of international laws and standards for cyber processes on the development of global markets and the potential implications for data ownership and privacy rights.

Limitations

This research is limited in scope due to the complexity of cyber processes and the fact that it is still a relatively new field. This limits the amount of available information on the topic; thus, it is difficult to develop an adequate theoretical framework for this research. Furthermore, there is uncertainty about how contemporary multilateral laws and principles will be utilized to new technologies like cryptocurrencies and artificial intelligence, limiting the scope of the research. Furthermore, because various international organizations heavily regulate cyber processes, predicting the ramifications of international norms and laws for cyber operations is difficult. Ultimately, this research will be limited by the availability of data and the lack of clarity regarding how international laws and standards will be applied to new technologies.

The research is also limited by the field’s current state, which is still in its infancy. As a result, it is difficult to accurately predict the implications of existing and future international laws and standards for cyber processes. Furthermore, since this research is focused on legal and political aspects of cyber processes, it does not consider the technical aspects or implications of such research.

Experimental design

The research design for this project included both qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative research methods such as interviews, questionnaires, and case studies were used to gain an in-depth understanding of cyber processes’ various legal, political, and technological aspects. Quantitative research methods such as surveys and statistics were also used to analyze large datasets on international cyber-process laws and standards. Additionally, this research explored existing literature to understand better how international laws and standards are currently being applied to cyber processes.

This study also included the creation of a theoretical framework for analyzing the ramifications of internationally agreed statutes and regulations for cyber procedures. This framework provided a structured approach for exploring cyber processes’ various legal, political, and technological aspects. Furthermore, this research developed a comprehensive review of existing literature to better understand the field’s current state. This review identified gaps in existing knowledge and informed further research.

Finally, this research also involved developing new research questions and hypotheses that will be used to explore further the implications of existing international laws and standards for cyber processes. These questions and hypotheses will guide the research and provide direction for further exploration.

Outcome variables

The outcome variables of this research included an in-depth understanding of cyber processes’ legal, political, and technological aspects. Additionally, the research better understood how existing international laws and standards are being applied to cyber processes (Romashkina and Nataliya p25-32). The research also aimed to identify any potential implications for data ownership and privacy rights and the potential challenges that may arise from introducing new technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence (Ruhl, Christian, et al. p78-94). Additionally, the research helped inform future policy decisions and assess the effectiveness of existing international laws and standards.

The outcome of this research is expected to be an in-depth understanding of international laws and standards as applied to cyber processes and potential implications for data ownership and privacy rights. Additionally, this research provided policy solutions and potential research areas that can be used further to explore the implications of existing laws and standards. This helped inform future policy decisions and assess the effectiveness of current regulations. Ultimately, this research is expected to understand better cyber processes, their legal, political, and technological aspects, and potential solutions for better regulation.

Future research plan

This research was anticipated to offer the foundation for further investigation in the pitch of cyber security. Future research plans should focus on developing and implementing policy solutions identified in this research. Additionally, future research should explore the implications of new technologies, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence, on data ownership and privacy rights. Further research should also investigate the potential for international cooperation in regulating cyber processes so that all countries can benefit from uniform regulations. Ultimately, future research should strive to understand better cyber processes and their legal, political, and technological implications.

Results

The outcomes from this study indicate that existing international laws and standards are inadequate to regulate cyber processes effectively. Furthermore, the study discovered several potential effective interventions that can be utilized to address these gaps and obstacles in international cyber laws and standards (Secretary-General and U. N p45-53). The research has also identified potential implications of new technologies, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence, on data ownership and privacy rights. Lastly, the research has identified potential areas of further exploration in the field of cyber security.

Overall, this research has provided a better understanding of cyber processes’ legal, political, and technological aspects and has identified potential solutions for their better regulation. The research findings can be used to guide future political decisions and scientific pursuits in the domain of cyber security. Additionally, they can help create more effective cyber-process regulations and ensure data ownership and privacy rights protection (Waldron, Kathryn, and Marcum p23-28). This research has also provided a foundation for further exploration of cyber security. The potential for improved cyber security can be realized with further research and policy implementation.

Summary

This research has explored cyber processes’ legal, political, and technological aspects. It has identified several potential policy solutions for better regulating these processes. It has discussed the implications of new technologies, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence, on data ownership and privacy rights. The research also identified potential areas of further exploration in the field of cyber security. The potential for improved cyber security can be realized with further research and policy implementation. Ultimately, this research has provided a foundation for further exploration to ensure the effective protection of data ownership and privacy rights.

Works Cited

Adamson, Liisi. “Let them roar: small states as cyber norm entrepreneurs.” European foreign affairs review 24.2 (2019).

Assembly, U. G. Open-Ended Working Group on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security. Retrieved March, 28, 2021.

Assembly, UN General. “Official compendium of voluntary national contributions on the subject of how international law applies to the use of information and communications technologies by States submitted by participating governmental experts in the Group of Governmental Experts on Advancing Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace in the Context of International Security established pursuant to General Assembly resolution (2021).” (2021).

Body, Norm-Setting. “The Evolution of the UN Group of Governmental Experts on Cyber Issues.” New Conditions and Constellations in Cyber (2021): 15.

Broeders, Dennis, and Fabio Cristiano. “Cyber norms and the United Nations: between strategic ambiguity and rules of the road.” Available at SSRN 3819171 (2020).

Brunner, Isabella. “1998-UNGA Resolution 53/70’Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security’and Its Influence on the International Rule of Law in Cyberspace.” Available at SSRN 3856900 (2020).

Darwish, Amber, and Scott N. Romaniuk. “Cyber security in the French Republic.” Routledge Companion to Global Cyber-Security Strategy. Routledge, 2021. 62-72.

Delerue, François. “International cooperation on the international law applicable to cyber operations.” European Foreign Affairs Review 24.2 (2019).

Delerue, François. “Reinterpretation or contestation of international law in cyberspace?.” Israel Law Review 52.3 (2019): 295-326.

Douzet, Frédérick, Aude Géry, and François Delerue. “Building Cyber Peace While Preparing for Cyber War.” Cyber Peace: Charting a Path Toward a Sustainable, Stable, and Secure Cyberspace (2022): 170.

Eggenschwiler, Jaqueline. “Geneva Dialogue on Responsible Behaviour in Cyberspace: Private Sector.”

Garcia, Eugenio V. “The militarization of artificial intelligence: a wake-up call for the global south.” Available at SSRN 3452323 (2019).

Henriksen, Anders. “The end of the road for the UN GGE process: The future regulation of cyberspace.” Journal of Cybersecurity 5.1 (2019): tyy009.

Joonkoo, Yoo. “UN Open-Ended Working Group Final Report: Issues and Implications.” IFANS FOCUS (??) 2020.36 (2021): 1-3.

Korzak, Elaine. “The US, the UK, Russia and China (1): Regulating cyber attacks under international law–developments at the United Nations.” Routledge Handbook of War, Law and Technology. Routledge, 2019. 375-380.

Krutskikh, Andrey V. “International information security: In search of consolidated approaches: Interview with Andrey V. Krutskikh, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation for International Cooperation in the Field of Information Security. Interviewed by DA Piskunov.” Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 22.2 (2022): 342-351.

Kulikova, Alexandra. “Cyber norms: technical extensions and technological challenges.” Journal of Cyber Policy 6.3 (2021): 340-359.

Lehto, Marja. “The rise of cyber norms.” Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. 32-45.

Leiss, Johann Ruben. “Jus Contra Bellum in Cyberspace and the Sound of Silence.” Oslo Law Review 1 (2022): 26-49.

Levinson, Nanette. “Inclusive Anticipatory Governance: Cyber Technologies, Absorptive Capacities & The Case of the United Nations Open-Ended Working Group re: ICTS.” (2022).

Liivoja, Rain, and Ann Väljataga, eds. Autonomous cyber capabilities under international law. NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, 2021.

Lotrionte, Catherine. “Bringing the Law In.” The Cyber Defense Review 7.1 (2022): 23-32.

Maroz, Nataliya. “A Critical Analysis of the Need for a Stronger International Legal Framework for Cyber Ethics in Times of Pandemic.” ” Ethics and Deontology” Journal 1.01 (2021): 60-73.

Nadhifah, Hana Nada. Diplomasi Siber Indonesia dalam United Nations Group of Governmental Experts on Developments In The Field of Information And Telecommunications In The Context of International Security 2012-2019. BS thesis. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Ott, Nikolas, and Anna-Maria Osula. “The Rise of the Regionals: How Regional Organisations Contribute to International Cyber Stability Negotiations at the United Nations Level.” 2019 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon). Vol. 900. IEEE, 2019.

Painter, Christopher. “The United Nations’ cyberstability processes: surprising progress but much left to do.” Journal of Cyber Policy 6.3 (2021): 271-276.

Pauletto, Christian. “Information and telecommunications diplomacy in the context of international security at the United Nations.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 14.3 (2020): 351-380.

Pytlak, Allison. “In search of human rights in multilateral cybersecurity dialogues.” Routledge Handbook of International Cybersecurity. Routledge, 2020. 65-78.

Romashkina, Nataliya P. “Problem of International Information Security in the UN.” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia 64.12 (2020): 25-32.

Ruhl, Christian, et al. Cyberspace and geopolitics: Assessing global cybersecurity norm processes at a crossroads. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace., 2020.

Secretary-General, U. N. “Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security: report of the Secretary-General.” (2017).

Waldron, Kathryn, and Anthony Marcum. “Kristen Nyman Fellow, National Security and Cybersecurity.” (2019).