Kant’s Argument for the Categorical Imperative, Outline Example

Thesis Statement: Kant’s concept of the categorical imperative establishes a necessary foundation for all philosophical thought.

1. The concept of the Imperative.
2. Kant defies hypothetical reasoning by insisting on an absolute morality.
3. The Imperative relies on human will as an instrument of authority, in that each human adheres to moral standards applicable to all.
4. Arguments refuting the validity of the Categorical Imperative.
5. It is outside the realm of reason to insist on moral absolutism, as history clearly indicates no such entity.
6. The Imperative permits too open an interpretation of morality, as the only standard to which it is held is that of individual sensibility.
7. The Imperative is flawed because it requires an ethical correctness by no means inherent in humanity, collectively or individually.

• Counter-arguments in support of Kant’s concept.

1. That history evinces no consistent evidence of a moral absolutism cannot serve to deny the existence of one.
2. There is rational evidence supporting that most individuals, no matter their choices, possess an awareness of right and wrong, and this alone validates the imperative.
3. This awareness of moral correctness in place, the Imperative requires only that people turn to it, which provides further evidence of its existence.
4. Conclusion, restatement of thesis.