Philosophical Comparisons, Essay Example

Hobbes

1. State of nature

Thomas Hobbes’ philosophy on the human state of nature specifically indicates the fact that human living is short and brutal. It also instantiates the condition of solitary being that each human being is expected to experience. Nevertheless, such solitary condition need not alienate them from the condition of being able to live alongside each other. It is also evident how Hobbes points out that the capacity of each individual to living alongside each other should impose the fact that everyone is equal and that no one should be discriminated due to this idealism on equality.

2. Rights of government

Although Hobbes believes that humans ought to be equal, he points out how it is important for a community to be governed by one leader [in a way one government] as it is a natural state of human beings to desire to have power. Without the existence of one leader, it would be evidently necessary for individuals to fight for the seat of authority.

3. Rights of citizens

Hobbes also considers the fact that makes up an individual relatively human through the realization of his rights to liberty. This principle simply implies the right of each individual to become what they want to become, consider doing things that they want to accomplish and likely be able to gain command over their lives as a whole. This right to liberty however is limited by the rights of other individuals the same element of freedom. A balance of living and letting others live is what constitutes the idea over the rights of citizens.

4. Rights of revolt

When the rights of the citizens are not specifically recognized by the government, it is the people’s right to revolt and retaliate. It is part of their right to be specifically provided by the government with the chance to realize satisfaction out of life and when such satisfaction is not earned, revolt becomes a necessary step to take.

Locke

1. State of nature

Freedom is the primary foundation of Locke’s beliefs over the state of nature that humans are supposed to be involved in. He points out that humans have the rightful capacity to realize their freedom according to the capacity of being able to do what they want, dispose off their possessions and gain more if they want to. They are however to be bounded by the laws of nature as it defines the primary being of their capacity to realize their rights under rightful grounds.

2. Rights of government

While people are expected to give their blessing as to who is supposed to lead them as a community, the government has the right to provide specific guidelines as to how they should live and how they should let others live alongside them. The systems in the society that are to be considered to be the foundation of the society could be directed accordingly by the government; so long as the government and the leaders do not go beyond their given power, it is their right to create policies and regulations that would provide the human individuals a better sense of understanding their process of development and the way that they ought to function as members of the community.

3. Rights of citizens

While every human being has a right, they also have limiting conditions that is specifically provided under the guidance of the government. The basic rule however is not to harm anyone at any cost at any particular process considered. Once one harms another, it is specifically indicative that such citizens be punished accordingly; of course under the provisions and constraints of the law.

4. Rights of revolt

Due to the idea of responding to harm, revolting against being specifically treated unjustly is considered necessary to retain social balance. Locke points out that when something has been taken from another it should be returned under the same value. Considerably, when it comes to not being given the liberty that each person deserves to have, revolt becomes valid and acceptable.