Strategies in Resolving Disagreements Among Children, Annotated Bibliography Example

Holly E. Recchia, Cecilia Wainryb, & Nina, Howe. (n.d). Two Sides to Every Story? Parents’ Attributions of Culpability and Their Interventions into Sibling Conflict. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 5 9, No. 1.

The focus of this study is the association between parents observed interventions into sibling conflict and their attribution to culpability. The study points out that the parents refer to the perspective of the younger child and provided evidence in favor of the younger child in their interventions. The study asserts that the conflict judgments of the parent have a link to intervention strategies employed in the development of constructive strategies to conflict resolution. Irrespective of the results of the study stemming from the study of a small sample group and, therefore, the outcome of the study are not extensive as expected, Holly et al. (n.d) use other relevant literature to support the outcome of the study. The study achieves its objective by requesting parents to make judgments of fault as well as assist children solve conflicts. The procedure adopted provides a reflection of parenthood on the parent’s part as well as the children’s conflicts. The study asserts that the attributions of culpability by parents on their children arise from the understanding of the root of conflicts between children. This understanding relates to the strategies developed by parents in resolving these conflicts.

This study becomes relevant to the topic as it sheds more light on the question at hand. Putting into consideration the fact that the study provides that it is essential for the parent to appreciate the root of the problem and culpability in order to come up with good strategies towards problem solving, the contribution to the current research is implicit. The study provides for the correlation between understanding the problem and developing sound strategies aimed at problem solving. It is noteworthy therefore, strategies aimed at solving problems between mothers and children stem from the understanding of the root causes as provided for by Holly et al. (n.d) and in this case the study makes an immense contribution in the development of these strategies.

Holly E. Recchia, Hildy S. Ross, and Marcia Vickar. (2010). Power and Conflict Resolution in Sibling, Parent–Child and Spousal Negotiations. Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 5, 605–615.

The study looks into the resolution of conflicts both between and within generations. The position of the study of these issues is that whereas the within generation conflict does not achieve any absolute outcome and usually results in a standoff the between the generation conflict end in a more win loss situation. It is noteworthy that the study touches on observational designs in examining and development of strategies for conflict resolution within the family. The study further asserts that the constructiveness of the strategies developed by parents on conflict resolution relies heavily on the features of the relationship among the parties. However, the conflicts between parents and children give little emphasis to learning about the development of constructive strategies.

Although the study only looked into the relationship of both parents in coming up with the findings of the research. It found implications of the difference between the way both the father and the mother resolve conflicts. However, this issue warrants further research to identify the unique differences between the two. Regardless that the study at hand focuses on the mother child relationship, this research performs a vital role in the improvement of issues since it is in touch with the context of strategies in conflict resolution in children. On the other hand, the study provides a highlight into the understanding of developing ways to promote constructive conflict resolution strategies. This touches on the current hypothesis as it also provides for the link between the child and the parent and the essence of planning in the development of strategies in the resolution of conflicts among children.

Nicole Campione-Barr and Judith G. Smetana. (2010). ‘‘Who Said You Could Wear My Sweater?’’ Adolescent Siblings’ Conflicts and Associations with Relationship Quality. Child Development, March/April 2010, Volume 81, Number 2, Pages 464–471.

This study by Nicole and Judith looks into the types of conflict among the participants who were adolescences in order to understand the relationship between conflict frequency and its intensity. The study further looks into the association between different types of conflicts and the relationship between siblings. The study hypothesizes that low levels of trust and communication lead to negative habits in the teenagers. The connection between conflict and the relationship of the parents and children affect the development of strategies aimed at conflict resolution between these parties.

Accordingly, the study identifies the presence of a variety of forms of conflict in siblings; these conflicts include the form of the issue, sex and age. However, the study demonstrates that these can be differentiated into either moral conflicts or personal domain conflicts. This assertion, nevertheless, is based on the small and non-representative sample population used in the study. Consequently, the use of other studies relevant to the issue supports the findings of the study.

This study provides an understanding that the resolution of conflicts in such circumstances requires consideration in problem solving and more so in the development of strategies aimed at this goal. The relevance of the study to the current research, therefore, stems from these findings and their effects on the quality of relationships. The implication in this circumstance denotes that the level of trust in relationships drives the strategies employed in conflict resolution and as such, it is important to put into consideration this element in the development of strategies aimed at conflict resolution.

Nina, H., Leigh, Karavasilis & Jasmin Aquan-Assee. (2011). Sibling Relationship Quality in Early Adolescence: Child and Maternal Perceptions and Daily Interactions Infant and Child Development Inf. Child. Dev.20: 227–245

The study focuses on the understanding of the attributes of power in the relationship between the mother and the child as well as the contribution of behaviors and beliefs towards the relationship. The study provides an understanding into the perceived practices and beliefs of middle-aged children. It puts forward the complexity of relationships between children and parents and further provides assumptions to the close relationship between mother and child. Regardless of the small sample size and the lack of diversity of the respondents used in the study the findings of the study results is consistent with other research findings in the field. The research provides additional information on the issue of relationships between parents and children and the essence of power in these relationships. The objectiveness of the study, as well as its support for theories of power, provides a clear consistency in the development of the study’s findings.

The study’s results of the show that parents should exercise leniency towards the children in order to support their independent behaviors. The study discusses the concept of power in a relationship more so between the mother and child. The understanding of this concept informs the development of clear strategies in solving disagreements constructively. The study findings depict the necessity of parents to take into consideration the power perceptions of the children in disagreement situation. This in turn assists in the clarification of thoughts and ideas associated to positive conflict resolution strategies.

Accordingly, it is imperative that this study touches on the core area of the current research. Given that, the study by Nina and Jasmine (2011) provides for the consideration of power perceptions in the development of strategies to resolve conflicts it is notable that the research coincides with the hypothesis of the research at hand.

Sandra Della Porta & Nina Howe. (n.d) Assessing Mothers’ and Children’s Perceptions of Power through Personal, Conventional, and Prudential Conflict Situations. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 4

The study asserts that the quality of a relationship is based on close and intimate relationships and the same guided by both behavior and perceptions. Accordingly, perceptions and relationship of the parents and children inform the understanding of how families formulate a shared perspective of the world. Consequently, the authors look into the communication between child and maternal perceptions and the quality of the relationship of the child to other siblings. The correspondence of general perceptions between the mother and the child is also another factor that informs the research. The findings of the research show the correspondence between these perceptions and provide that families share a similar view of positive features of the relationship more so on warmth as well as daily exchanges.

Sandra and Nina (n.d) provide that the relationship between the parent and the child depend on the quality of the relationship as well as the perspective of the family on the world. It is, therefore, notable that the quality of the relationship can only be achieved through molding these perspectives. Although the sample used does not exemplify the global target group especially in the race and language the use of relevant research in the field, inform satisfactory findings. In respect to research at hand, this study becomes essential in developing strategies aimed at assisting children and parents solve problems constructively because Sandra and Nina (n.d) provide that the quality of the relationship determine the constructiveness of solutions from such strategies. The implication is that where the quality of the relationship is good the solution of the problem is likely to be more constructive than where the quality of the relationship is poor. This, therefore, implies that in order to come up with constructive strategies it is critical to put into consideration the relationship quality as well as family perspectives.

Reference list

Holly E. Recchia, Cecilia Wainryb, & Nina, Howe. (N.d). Two Sides to Every Story? Parents’ Attributions of Culpability and Their Interventions Into Sibling Conflict. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 1.

Holly E., Recchia, Hildy S. Ross, and Marcia Vickar. (2010). Power and Conflict Resolution in Sibling, Parent–Child and Spousal Negotiations. Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 5, 605–615.

Nicole Campione-Barr and Judith G. Smetana. (2010). ‘‘Who Said You Could Wear My Sweater?’’ Adolescent Siblings’ Conflicts and Associations with Relationship Quality. Child Development, March/April 2010, Volume 81, Number 2, Pages 464–471.

Nina, H., Leigh, Karavasilis & Jasmin Aquan-Assee. (2011). Sibling Relationship Quality in Early Adolescence: Child and Maternal Perceptions and Daily Interactions Infant and Child Development Inf. Child. Dev.20: 227–245

Sandra Della Porta & Nina Howe. (N.d) Assessing Mothers’ and Children’s Perceptions of Power through Personal, Conventional, and Prudential Conflict Situations. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 5 8, No. 4