The First Genuine Autobiography, Reaction Paper Example

Sigmund Freud’s Leonardo Da Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood

Question 1: What are the compelling arguments formed by other critics on Freud’s psychological idealisms?

This question was not addressed directly although it was touched a bit in the overall context of the article. Since the article is pro Freud, it was evident that the data presented in it are all in support of the ideas of the philosopher; nevertheless, it was rather important to put the critics’ consideration on the matter especially because they are supposed to create a balancing effect on the validity of the information provided by the article.

This could be resolved through determining a more imperative sense of improving the ways by which the cases of Freud’s presentation could be questioned or challenged through logical conditions of thinking.

Question 2: What specific issues were presented by the article that might be questioned in consideration with the capacity of the philosopher to explain psychoanalysis at a much further rate of concentration?

Although the article was able to make a definite indication on the primary ideas of Freud, it could be realized how it was basically a contemplation on what was positive about Freud’s ideas. It would have been better if the balance is set through providing the pros and cons of his ideas especially in connection with how modern psychology recognizes its worth.

Content analysis measures of imagery for the achievement

Question 1: What made Leonardo da Vinci’s recommendations on personality psychology workable for the current generation?

The article does provide a more constructive form on the historical background of the psychological suggestions of da Vinci. Nevertheless, it does not provide the contemporary application of such philosophies. It would have been best if the article provided a more contemporary case presenting the applicability of the matter today.

Question 2: Testing personal motives was a concern for the article’s completion; but no strong evidences were used to make the presentation applicable at present. How could it be applied today?

The worth of the article is directed towards developmental psychology and yet it does not provide contemporary examples. It would have been best if there were examples of personal developmental theories noted in the article which would be applicable at present.