The Role of Justice, Essay Example

The Role of Justice in Identifying the Common Grounds between Human Rights and Human Responsibilities towards Each Other

 Introduction

Justice is one matter that makes up the human society and specifically identifies its capacity to make extensive consideration over the need to establish social camaraderie. Human individuals have their desires and personal considerations that are often defined through contentious decisions that they make to be able to completely realize the worth of such desires in themselves. However, not all these desires are dependent on human respect. Most often than not, these desires are directed to self-praise or self realization of worth. Notably, with such concern for the “self” humans tend to think less of others and more of their personal sources of satisfaction. This is the reason why it has become essential for principles on human camaraderie to be established. This is especially true when it comes to defining the role of professionals in responding to their responsibilities to the society with specific consideration to medical science and the ways by which it explores the human body and making implicative decisions on how to create relative cures to impending health problems at present.

The policies and principles that are often used to define human worth and the need to competently manifest personal satisfaction involve the need for individuals to realize their condition of responsibility towards other individuals. An established fact that one’s being is connected with another further strengthens this particular principle especially at the point of making extensive considerations as to how one individual makes personal decisions that could affect another’s or other’s welfare. Considering this, it could be noted that responsible living becomes an essential aspect of the matter. Legal clauses have also regarded the need for such principles to be recognized especially in the manner of creating laws that would establish human rights and at the same time protect its values to the human society. In the discussion that follows, some of the core factors that make up these principles of human camaraderie shall be presented and analyzed accordingly in relation to their application to the values and the worth of human justice system.

Understanding the Principle of Nonmaleficence

The principle of nonmaleficence comes from the ancient core conditions that established the maxim primum non nocere or also noted as the Latin term that imposes on the idea of “first, do no harm” policy which most professionals [especially in the healthcare industry] realizes to be essential. In the same manner, the same principle has been used to be the core foundation of the social development even of ancient human civilizations as they created legal grounds that were supposed to keep the existence of peace and security within the said communities. Understandably, the core reason for one to live in recognition of his responsibility to do no harm to anyone is a basic condition that is easier to contend. The principle is simple and could be easily realized for application as it does present a reasonable course of living for everyone else.

The principles of nonmaleficence specifically support the idea of living and letting live which considers the fact that one person’s decision would naturally affect another and being concerned about such fact makes a human individual the human that he or she is supposed to be. Concern upon other’s welfare is what this particular principle hopes to establish. Successfully, its simple background and indication of value represents a core foundation on how social relationship between humans should be better recognized and established based on social realization of personal and external consideration upon other’s welfare and living conditions.

Considering the Course of Social Justice

Social justice depends on the course by which human individuals intend to treat others in line with their personal desires. The establishment of the clauses that protect the human rights specifically depend on such a principle. While human rights have been deemed to provide human individuals with the ample source of freedom that they could use to make sure their desires are given way, the same clauses mirror the responsibilities they have on others in respect to their own human rights. As if creating an essence of parallelism, the dependence of social justice on the principles of nonmaleficence creates a defining condition by which humans tend to follow the course of respect that they should have towards each other especially in course by which they intend to contend with a personal desire that they hope to embrace. In short, putting a prioritizing condition on “not doing harm on others” puts one in a questioning position as to whether or not his desires or his decision would indeed harm other people living around him. If those decisions do impose harm on others then that is a direct violation of the establishment of human justice.

The consideration over the need of humans to realize their responsibility towards others makes a distinctive presentation on how human justice is dependent on human camaraderie. An aspect of relationship that humans must successfully respond to especially when it comes to making extensive decisions that are to cause specific matters that would affect other individuals as well. Remarkably, it is the desire of humans to make decisions that would not directly go against the established rights of the others that is set to be the stepping stone of this specific principle of living, a core standing element that establishes the strength and value of human rights at present.

What it means to be dignified as a Human Being

Respect responds to the need of dignifying another individual. In the application of the principles of nonmaleficence again applies constructively into this particular matter in response to the need of people to establish respect for others. Naturally, the capacity of one to respect another is specifically defined by the willingness that one has to recognize the human value of another. Once that recognizable value is breached then the application and recognition of human dignity is reduced to nothing. Notably, this is the reason why the clauses of human rights often define the need of dignifying another’s value as a human being, in a way respecting another’s personal being in contention with his desire to become more acceptable in the society. So long as one does not overturn the dignity of another individual, his freedom to contend with his own desires need not be controlled or hindered.

Conclusion

To note, the principles behind the establishment of human rights and the parallel conditions of human responsibilities that come along with it are relatively simple. The recognition of respect, dignity and the need to do no harm on others are basic conditions that humans have a clear understanding of. Nevertheless, there are instances when personal desires tend to overcome such principles hence making it hard for individuals to realize the real worth of human camaraderie for them hence causing them to lose a sense of personal freedom due to the application of relatively related laws that would regulate their acts towards other people. It is essential that human rights be recognized by everyone else so as to protect their own freedom to do what they will to do. Noting their responsibility towards others if they know that the principles surrounding such matter are simple elements of human connection that are easy to understand and at the same time apply. Realizing this matter especially in the field of medicine further strengthens the capacity of the medical officers or the healthcare givers to realize their real role in respecting the rights and dignity of patients as human beings and balancing that with the desire to create cures to diseases and ailments that are supposed to save the lives of many.

References

Smith, C. M. (2005). “Origin and Uses of Primum Non Nocere—Above All, Do No Harm!”. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 45 (4): 371–377.

Rawls, John. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Quigley, Carroll. (1961). The Evolution Of Civilizations: An Introduction to Historical Analysis. Second edition 1979. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

Tom L.Beauchamp and James F. Childress. Principle of Biomedical Ethics Sixth Edition Chapter 5 Nonmaleficence. p149-190 and Chapter 7 Justice p240-281.