“The Tyger” & “The Lamb”, Book Review Example

The Lamb: Response Paper

Thinking of its meekness and obedient character as it heed the call of its shepherd, the author specifically refers to the animal’s willingness to follow and its desire to be recognized by its master and serve the needs of his master as expected. The author also gave a clear definition of what the physical characteristic of the lamb appears to be and how it seems to be a blessing for the animal itself.

He used the words “he is meek”; “he is mild”; “he is like a child” and one with “a tender voice” to describe the lamb being represented in the poem.

The simple language simply helps the reader find a direct connection of the central figure in the poem as connected to the human being aimed to be described alongside the said animal.

The question asked was who made thee? This question could be considered answered in the second paragraph where the creator of the lamb was described to be a lamb himself, having all the wonderful characteristics of a lamb and a meek one himself. Pointing out that he himself as become a child imposes that the creator of the lamb is Jesus, based on the history of how the Bible describes him as well. The response was sufficient enough as it did give the necessary picture needed to point out to Jesus as the one who created the lamb because of the distinctive relation his life has with the descriptive words used to define him.

The poem points out that the lamb and its maker had the same meekness, mildness and the obedient characteristic which is the same to that of a child.

The lamb represents how Christ himself became a child, served as meek and mild individual to the people he hoped to help understand the truth.

SKETCH:

The Tiger: Response Paper

The author specifically feels in awe of the characteristic of the Tiger especially that of its fierce appearance. It does not necessarily point out that it he is afraid of the tiger but it does impose that he is at some point amazed with the idea that this creature has so much power over it that it does appear as an exact opposite of the lamb.

The vivid use of the description of the tiger’s eyes as a fiery furnace contemplates the supposed anger of the creature which of course inspires fear on the reader who imagines the picture.

Fire does impose the definition of both anger, fierce and desire to “kill”. The essence of utilizing such a matter to describe the Tiger gives the creature in this poem a strong characteristic that is defined through its strong emotions defined by its appearance.

The author specifically defined the making of the tiger to be characterized by the throwing down of spears from the stars alongside burning the creature in the furnace hence making it as sturdy as possible that it cannot be ran-away from once it sets its eyes on a prey. The author also described how the heart of the tiger has been hardened as strong as steel due to the fiery furnace that enraged it.

Apparently, the author asks who made the Tiger and wonders if he was the same one who created the lamb. Nevertheless, the doubt imposes that the creator of the Tiger is also assumed to have the same characteristic of the creature as represented in the poem.

Satan could apparently be the one being described as the personification of the tiger, while Christ stands as the personification of the lamb. Relatively, it could be analyzed that the religious question arising herein is that if there was one God who created them, how come these personas stand to be too different from each other. Was it the God who created them to be questioned of his capabilities or the individuals themselves be assumed to have control over the characteristics they invoke to grow along with and embrace as their reputation?

The lamb is seen to have the meek and mild character; knowing that Jesus is the one being presented in the description of the lamb, it could be analyzed how the lamb appeared to have become stronger than the fierce tiger [Satan] even though the tiger itself seemed to be scary and enraged with anger. This then imposes that it is neither anger nor domination that makes a person strong, but the calmness of the heart and the righteousness of one’s being.

Relatively, although this poem defines a remarkable religious indication, it does provide a meaning for humans as they live their lives in the middle of fear of so many things. Considerably, with such an impacting course of development between people as they experience so many challenges, it is imposed that calmness makes a greater gift that helps one survive life than dominion over others as represented by the tiger’s character.

No, the tiger appearing in the picture seems to be milder than that of the one being described in the poem. The poem specifically indicates how the tiger seems to appear to be fear inspiring due to its fiery eyes and its supposedly burning skin inspired by rage and anger. More like the one shown in the illustration herein: