Type 2 Diabetes: Data Analysis, Results and Discussions, Research Paper Example

Data Analysis, Results and Discussions

To be able to confirm whether or not the behavior of African Americans truly affect their condition in consideration with their health, it has been proposed that an interview probe on participants [both African Americans and non-African Americans] be considered hence setting a source of information. The reason for the separation of the races of the interview participants is considered so as to make sure that there shall be a set of comparison between the results garnered from each procedure. To note, the non-African American participants are to be considered the control group for the analysis while the African American participants shall be set as the observation group. Productively, it is expected that from this point of the research, confirming the claims and the information written within the literary sources examined within the review section would be conducted. All participants are within the range of ages 25 to 35 who are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

Given that this is a qualitative study, the participants are not only to be measured based on their responses, but their attitude during the interview session shall be recorded. Since the element being measured is “behaviour” the actuations, tone of voice and the conviction of each participant play a great role on identifying what they really think. To make the measurement more effective, the researcher shall incorporate the use of the Likert scale when already identifying the each of the elements that the participants mention to be directly affective on their part and the ways by which they eat or the way they treat themselves relevantly resulting to obesity and later on to the emergence of type 2 diabetes in their system. This shall be administered during the analysis process whereas it would be the researcher who would determine the scale of consideration that the participants give attention to and note these responses in a prepared Likert-chart.

The comparison between the responses of the control and the observational groups shall be presented in a form of graphical image based on the commonality of several elements between the two groups observed. It is expected that through this approach, it shall be confirmed whether or not the African American women really has greater chances of getting type 2 diabetes and become obese at the same time compared to the non-African American women’s condition because of their behavioural upbringing. The result of the comparison shall be presented in the likeness of the graph that follows:

This could be further supported by the information posted at CDC which yields the following diagrammatic presentation:

Age-Standardized Prevalence* of Diagnosed Diabetes per 100 Adult Female Population, by State, United States, 1996-1998 (Source: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/women/index.htm#2. Retrieved on February 21, 2012).

Noting these particular elements and understanding how they relate to the development of the African American women’s being prone to incurring obesity and type 2 diabetes shall provide a confirmation on the truth or reliability of information posted through the literary sources that have been examine earlier. Considerably, this shall set a common ground between the past researches and the new findings that this study is grounded upon. The relative connection of both sets of data shall affirm whether or not behaviour over food really does have something to do with the development of health issues among participants who were examined in the process of interviewing. This approach shall also confirm whether or not the hypothesis on behavioural bearing connected to health condition is valid especially in relation to understanding based on the theories that put forth the history of the African Americans as slaves and how they respond to this in connection to their present state of health conditions. Carefully measuring the results is expected to create a relative impact on how the development of past results directly relate to the results that are garnered from this current study.

References

Norman, Geoff (2010). “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics”. Advances in Health Science Education. Vol 15(5) pp625-632.

Babbie, Earl R. (2005). The Basics of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. p. 174.