Abortion, Research Proposal Example

One of the most relevant and controversial social issues of the 21^st Century is abortion. Although abortion is legal as noted by the Supreme Court of the United States, it is nonetheless one of the most heated and contentious issues that exists in America today. Many people argue that abortion involves the killing of an innocent human being and is often grounded in religious roots and beliefs. This issue is largely politicized across party lines, but it is evident that it is highly individualized choice of whether or not to have an abortion or to support another individual’s decision to have an abortion. Regardless of the whether or not an individual supports or is against abortion, it is nonetheless a personal belief and a personal choice. In evaluating abortion as a social and a political issue, there are many layers to consider, as many people may argue that abortion is never appropriate, appropriate under specific conditions, or is appropriate when an individual deems it necessary. With any of these perspectives, it is important to address all sides of the issue, including stigma and the emotional factors involved with this issue so that all perspectives are better understood and appreciated. The following discussion will address the abortion issue in greater detail from a number of perspectives so that all sides of the argument are considered. Regardless of preference, individual perspectives must be respected and the law of the land should be taken seriously. It is important to recognize the challenges surrounding this issue and to take it seriously and without preconceived notions or judgments which could lead to negative perceptions and behaviors. In essence, the abortion argument will never be solved; however, constructive and meaningful discussions are possible regarding this issue under the semblance of mutual respect and understanding.

Establishing precedent in addressing abortion from all sides requires respect and responsibility for personal choices and beliefs. All sides of this issue possess strong and unwavering beliefs in regards to why abortion is acceptable, why it is not, or why it is appropriate on a conditional basis. The arguments made are often exhaustive and detailed in nature; therefore, simplification of these arguments is essential to develop a more meaningful and relevant discussion of this topic. For the sake of this discussion, the pro-choice argument will be considered. Abortion rights activists often argue that it is a woman’s personal right and freedom to choose what do with her body and with her unborn child. Based upon the freedoms provided by the United States Supreme Court, abortion is permitted by law. However, there are significant social, emotional, and political perspectives which take precedence when abortion is considered. In many ways, pro-choice activists support abortion on the basis of their emotional investment (Lopez 511). Furthermore, the question regarding ethics is always considered in any abortion discussion, as the ethical nature of this procedure is often examined (Lopez 512). Regardless, a pro-choice perspective is acceptable and appropriate, based upon the legal standards set forth by the federal government. It is a woman’s individual right to consider and have an abortion, so as long as she makes the choice under her own free will. If the decision is made for her or under duress, the choice is removed from the equation. This latter approach is unacceptable and unethical on many levels. In order to develop an effective argument for pro-choice, it is essential to address the more basic concept of reproductive rights because it reflects a woman’s right to choose and to govern what actions she takes with her own body. This is perhaps the most critical component of any pro-choice argument because it delves into the root of the problem more effectively.

In making the pro-choice argument, there are a number of layers to consider which reflect the ability of women to make decisions independently on their own behalf which will directly impact their reproductive health. This issue requires further evaluation from different perspectives in an effort to develop a valid and meaningful response. Examining classic approaches to arguments provides additional support in ensuring preferences and perspectives in an effective manner. For example, in evaluating the pro-choice issue, the argument from consequence is appropriate because it evaluates the abortion issue in the context of abortion as a truth with desirable consequences. It is important to recognize this argument because the more truthful the action, the better the consequences are and vice versa. For pro-choice activists, this argument is relevant because it represents an opportunity to observe abortion as a truth and a positive action; thus the consequences are expected and intended. On the other hand, anti-abortion activists argue that abortion is an unacceptable falsehood and leads to negative and unintended consequences.

In evaluating the argument from resemblance, pro-choice activists might compare this action to something else to demonstrate that the outcomes of that other action are positive, so abortion is also positive. In the context of reproductive rights, this argument is likely to have some significance because support of reproductive rights also enables women to make choices regarding whether or not to have an abortion that may have positive outcomes for their lives. In theory, this framework provides further evidence for the support of freedom for both reproductive rights and abortion, and that infringement upon these principles is a violation of personal freedoms (Keighley). The resemblance between reproductive rights and abortion is valid in this instance because they are both personal freedoms that women possess and should not be interfered with by lawmakers or otherwise (Keighley).

4. The development of a successful pro-choice argument and position is essential to support this highly controversial and multi-layered issue. Regardless of the position, abortion creates significant animosity and tension amongst groups and individuals, particularly in the areas of religion and politics. Nonetheless, both sides deserve an opportunity to voice their opinions. It is important for pro-choice supporters to exercise fairness and allow pro-life supporters to share their perspectives and insights regarding this socially monumental issue. For many pro-life activists, the abortion argument is centered on the killing of a human being and does not consider women’s reproductive rights in the process. However, the latter is significant and highly relevant to any argument regarding abortion, either for or against. In essence, “women’s rights are at stake because women’s reproductive rights and justice are constantly challenged” (Liu). This perspective is valid because pro-choice supporters strongly believe that if abortion is not permitted, women do not have a voice in how they choose to manage their reproduction (Liu). This is a basic infringement upon rights and beliefs and should not be tolerated nor supported across governments and other regulatory bodies. In a highly progressive 21^st Century, there is a serious threat to women’s rights and their integrity due to highly regressive thoughts and principles by many pro-life activists and other groups. It is evident that some circles consider women’s rights as less than significant; however, women’s rights are as equally important as men’s rights and should be treated as such.

In some respects, anti-abortion proponents work the pro-choice groups by feeding on their emotions and sentiments and in turn, wreak havoc on their sensibilities (Foster et.al 81). These efforts are significant because they attempt to bring down women and their rights to a much lower level and do not consider how these actions take their toll on the opposing group (Foster et.al, 81). In anti-abortion circles, the existence of protestors and abortion clinics, rallies, and at other facilities demonstrates their level of power and commitment to reversing the law; however, this type of behavior has other negative consequences and may interfere with emotional stability and integrity for some women (Foster et.al 81). It is known that “The presence and behavior of abortion protesters have been intensely debated in the courts. These debates generally frame the issue as a contest between the first amendment rights of protesters to register their claim against abortion and the rights of providers or women not to be harassed and to feel safe” (Foster et.al 81). Under these circumstances, it is very difficult for many women to overcome the stigma of abortions and they may change their minds, even though having a child is not the best option for them, physically, emotionally, and financially. It is the responsibility of pro-life supporters to be respectful of pro-choice advocates and the women who choose to have abortions, regardless of their reasons for these decisions.

In summary, the development of a successful approach to improving the pro-choice argument is to maintain mutual respect and support for the other side of the argument, the pro-life advocates. In turn, pro-choice supporters should expect the same. However, due to the complex nature of this issue and its potential complications for women’s rights, it is the responsibility of the government to perform due diligence and to examine all sides of the argument. Since the United States was built upon a foundation of freedom, opportunity and personal rights, it is in the best interests of governing bodies to allow women as residents of the United States to have the right to manage their reproductive lives as they choose without further interference from any form of government, as well as private citizens who oppose these decisions.

Works Cited

Foster, D.G., Kimport, K., Gould, H., Roberts, SCM, and Weitz, T.C. “Effect of abortion protesters on women’s emotional response to abortion.” Contraception 87(2013): 81-87.

Keighley, Jennifer. ”Health care reform and reproductive rights: sex equality arguments for abortion coverage in a national plan.” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 33(2010): 357-402.

Liu, SJS. Women’s rights at stake: examination of the U.S. history and policy of women’s reproductive health and justice. World Learning, SIT Graduate Institute. Web. 13 February 2013.

Lopez, Raquel. ”Perspectives on abortion: pro-choice, pro-life, and what lies in between. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27.4(2012): 511-517.