Creating Public Health Policies, Article Critique Example

The article means that public health policies should be created through scientific processes and political reality. It is where the public is incorporated when collecting data and opinions on how they are affected. After the collection, data will be interpreted, analyzed, and conclusions made through a scientific process. However, it is not the case as per the article. The public are not incorporated in any way because the public health policies are made with influences and considerations from the public. The data used by the researchers and other experts are not from the public’s data leading to policies that do not solve the problems of the public. For example, the demise of tobacco legislation was passed as per the manipulative powers of the tobacco industry and not concerning 400000 Americans affected by the product. It is because the scientific consensus has been ignored, and the policies are in favor of political positions and owners of the industry. The point of the author is emphasizing that the public should be incorporated when creating public health policies. The author is advocating that the data should be collected directly from the public because they are the affected people, and the policies are intended to govern their health.

The article will have a great impact on the public health policies it has criticized the method they are using on creating public health policies. It will have to adopt the right procedure of creating the policies where the ordinary people are involved directly in the process of creating policies. It is through direct collection of data from the public and critically analyzing and interpreting them to arrive at quality conclusions and recommendations. The article is well written because it is trying to address the problems that the public are facing by being ignored when creating the policies, which will govern their health. Although the freedom of action is limited by financial, political, and ethical constraints, more should be done by employing definitive study designs and collecting the impeccable data. After collection, the data should be analyzed and interpreted scientifically without favoring the owners of the industry or political dominants. The public should be considered as a priority to save their lives. The experts working on the data should be imaginative and insightful when building a web of complementary evidence and collaborating with other professionals from other disciplines when need arises.