Educational Theory, Research Proposal Example

Proposal: Nature is life and life is in nature and by this philosophy, ideal relationships can generate asexual products within the confines of an ideal evolutionary design.

Introduction

The question was asked, does evolution explains the human nature and Frans de Waal replied, that if we look at the species without letting ourselves become blinded by the technological advances of the last millennia, we will see a creature bereft of new parts, and our intellect though superior, will reveal that there has been no basic needs or wants that cannot be observed in our close relatives (Vieth, 2009).

Ralph Waldo Emerson, speaking of nature writes, a subtle chain of countless rings, the next unto the farthest rings, the eyes reads omens where it goes and speak all the languages of the rose, while striving to be man, sees the worm mounts through all the spires of form. This thereby gives a depiction of nature in life and life manifesting in nature, both by what may seem like asexual means (Transcendentalism Web, 2012).

Further, Emerson reiterates, we are emboss for a season with in nature, whose flood of life streams around and through us, and invites us by the power they supply to actions proportioned by nature (Transcendentalism Web, 2012).

Asexual Reproduction

The formation of new individuals from cells of one parent without gamete formation or fertilization by another members of the species, defines Asexual Reproduction, according to Harrub & Thompson (2003). Eggs producing and sperm producing partners were not required and sporulation, yeast budding becomes interesting, even worth replicating while regeneration between the salamander and the starfish makes feasible the proposition tendered (Harrub & Thompson, 2003).

Dilemma exist says, Graham Bell who came knocking and intellectually and philosophically challenging, by reiterating that sex is the queen of problems in evolutionary biology, and as a phenomenon has generated much interests and confusion. How could a nature evolve a female member of a specie that produces eggs and is internally equipped to grow a nourishing growing embryo, while at the same time evolving a male member that produces sperm cells, Harrub & Thompson (2003), asked as they questioned asexual reproduction?

Evolutionary Design

Budding in biology, is a form of asexual reproduction in which an individual from some generative anatomical point of the parent organism, according to Encyclopedia Britannica (2012). In some cases buds are reproduced from any point, while in others there may be restriction to specialized areas, but the process is design to evolve in such a way that the protuberance of proliferating cytoplasm or cells (buds), eventually develops into organs using the life present in nature to duplicate the parent (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2012).

According to Miller, science itself, including evolutionary biology, is predicated on the idea that design, which is the correlation of structures with functions, lies at the heart of molecular nature of life (Science Daily, 2008). There is indeed a design to life Miler asserts, an evolutionary design, and though the human structures and functions have changed overtime, scientist should embrace the concept for the benefit of science, so that it can claim and orderly rationality which anti-evolutionist has long demanded (Science Daily, 2008).

General Philosophy on Nature

Many disagreements among evolutionary biologists are largely restricted to differences in general philosophy (idealism vs. realism), selection of phenomenon (structure v. function) definition of concepts (natural selection) and the position of the concept theory used as the explaining factor.(Dullemeijer, 1980).

The prevailing philosophy adopted for this proposal is “Real things last forever, existent things never dies, original things never imitate and nature never copies”.

Ideal Relationships

Piorotti &Wildcat (1997) and Turner et al (2000) submitted their inputs on ideal relationships, by remarking that Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is the application of the evolving knowledge about relationships to generate expansion and wisdom that cannot be easily become fragmented. Embracing Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Piorotti & Wildcat (1997) insist, enable respect for non-human entities as entities, recognition of bonds between humans and non-humans, appreciation for places in the environment, and the recognition of human beings as part of the ecological system, rather than separation from it.

Traits of ideal relationship will surface, when the queen in a women are what people are looking for, and linear relationships evolutionarily designed, manifest eternal characteristics, existential thinking, identity that complements with nature, a tendency to orient with the universal nature, the emergence of non-existence feelings, a live and let live philosophy, and an appreciation of the intrinsic quality innate in life by the individuals desirous of asexual reproduction.

Methodology

The proposal will become a reality when,

• The benefits of nature are embraced and transmitted to specifically chosen points
• Buds developing are brought together to form a child in like the protozoa, yeast, salamander or starfish while mirroring parent
• Consistently let it be down conceptually that nature has life, and life is in nature and an ideal relationship is present to bring forth asexually from the anatomical point
• Thank yourself for remaining on the existential plane
• Conclude that real things do last.

Conclusions

Evolution does explain human nature because asexual reproduction came to fruition as a result of ideal relationship made possible from evolutionary designs. Technological advances had served not to blind the aspirant but ensured the creation of new bud points, which the human world called children, without the input of motile sperm cells in an environment where they also existed with their partners.

Finally, this proposal is only emboss for a season in nature, where the menstrual cycle is taboo, but a flood of life streams towards prospective anatomical points, inviting them to become linear in relationship and mirror image of parents.

Reference

American Transcendentalism Web (2012).” Ralph Waldo Emerson: Nature “<www.vcu.edu/engensb/transcenfantilism/authors/emerson/nature.htm >

Dullemeijer, P. (1980). Functional Morphology and Evolutionary Biology Acta Biotheoretica Vol. 29 Issue 3-4 pp.151-250

Encyclopedia Britannica (2012). “Budding” Science and Technology <www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/83411/budding >

Harrub, B. & Thompson, B. (2003). “Evolutionary Theories on Gender and Sexual Reproduction” True Origin Archive <www.trueorigin.org/sex01.asp >

Piorotti, R. & Wildcat, D. (1997). “Evolution Creation and Native Traditions” Winds of Change Vol. 12 Issue 2 pp. 73-77]

Science Daily (2008). “There is Design in Nature Biologist Argues” < www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080217143838.htm >

Turner, N.J., Ignace, M.B. & Ignace, R. (2000). ”Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Wisdom of Aboriginal peoples in British Colombia” Ecological Applications Vol. 10 Issue 5 pp.1275-1287

Vieth, E. (2009).” Does evolution explains human nature” Cultural Evolution < www.dangerousintersection.org/2009/05/26/does-evolution-explain-human-nature >