A History Response, Assessment Example

The historical, political and leadership aspects were significant for the rise of the western nations. Effective and powerful strategies were key to the success of most kingdoms. The political power of a nation thus, is evident through its achievements. This paper is to assess the various political and strategies of successful rule in various ancient periods. It will also take into consideration the aspect of industrialization and its role in the 1800.

Napoleon Bonaparte`s contribution dung the early 1880s is a major contribution towards leadership. This can be formulated though the principle of war. On the other hand, Clausewitz suggested various principles that are presently applied. The scale of combat is significant in the defense, use of terrain, us of offensive, and use of troops. This can be observed from Machiavelli`s political reign in the 1500 (Taylor 2007).

The two badly warships hit by a launch from Japan to Russia were greatly affected. This can b explained though being efficient on the ground. The tactics that are to be used for a successful political body takes into account how it may gain preponderance of the physical forces. It also takes advantage at the decisive situation. Moral character to be calculated and the few means at the ruler`s disposal made into the best use. Calmness and firmness are important in any successful war. Political leaders are to have the choice in most careful and audacious solutions. This can be supported from the drastic attack that Japan made on Russia. Machiavelli was apolitical leader who lacked the leader qualities leading to his fall in Italy 1512. Nevertheless, it is essential to note that the western communities are relatively becoming powerful than other nations due to the aspect of industrialization since mid of the 20th century. This is due to application of various technological equipments and tools. This includes space satellites and CCTV cameras located at unknown areas for security measures (Troy 2004).

In conclusion, it is significant to note that political leadership and strategy calls for the political organization at economical and social levels. The challenge that Russia and Japan faced in its leadership did not only result from inefficient leadership, but also the aspect of industrialization. This counts for the country’s stability.